2020, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Rev Acta Médica 2020; 21 (3)
Characterization of Patients with Capsular Contracture Who Received Augmentation Mammoplasty with Implants
Tamayo CAM, Manrique TAF, Guardo VCA, Cuastumal FDK
Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 1-20
PDF size: 491.98 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Capsular contracture is the most common and frustrating complication in women who underwent breast augmentation.
Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with capsular contracture who underwent augmentation mastoplasty with implants.
Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of 30 cases, in which patients consented to participate. They belonged to the plastic surgery service of Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical-Surgical Hospital. The period analyzed was August 2017-June 2019, with epidemiological analysis of data tabulated in Epidat version 3.1. A level of significance was set at α=0.05.
Results: The mean age was 36±10.8 years, with effort of the upper limbs (63.3%) and with dominant right arm (73.3%). The most affected breast was the right (53.3%), while the most frequent clinical stage was grade III (36.7%) according to Baker's classification. The most used approach was the periareolar one (73.3%), with implant placement in the submuscular plane (63.3%). The most widely used implants had a volume greater than 300 cc (36.6%), high profile (53.3%), textured surface (63.3%), and round shape (86.7%). There were no complications in 56.6% of the patients, while 63.3% had breastfed at least once. The majority underwent postoperative massage (76.6%) and 46.6% of the women had more than six years of surgery.
Conclusions: The factors that were most associated to the onset of capsular contracture were the skillful hand, with work that required effort of the upper limb, a postoperative of more than six years, and periareolar technique.
REFERENCES
Scuderi N, Mazzocchi M, Fioramonti P. Treatment of the capsular contracture around mammary implants: our experience. Giomate di chirugia. 2008;29(8-9):369-72. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18834572 2. Graf R, Ascenço A, Freitas R, Balbinot P, Peressutti C, Diogo F, Ratti M, Kulchetscki R. Prevention of capsular contracture. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015;136(5):592e-6e. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2015/11000/Prevention_of_Capsular_Contracture_Using.7.aspx
Berrocal Revueltas, M. Las cuatro estaciones de las mamas. Primera edicion. Bogota, Colombia: Impresion Medica; 2014.
Bartsich S, Ascherman J, Rohde C. The breast: a clean-contaminated surgical site. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2011;31(7):802-6. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11417428
Blount A, Martin M, Lineberry K, Kettaneh N, Alfonso D. Cápsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2013;33(4):516-21. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13484465
Piña Martínez V. Factores etiológicos implicados en la aparición de contractura capsular mamaria en pacientes intervenidas de mamoplastia de aumento con fines estéticos: estudio prospectivo observacional. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2016;42(1):13-20. Disponible en: https://eprints.ucm.es/46201/1/T39352.pdf 7. Vandeputte J. Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2016; 36(1):1-29. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/36.supplement_1.1
Chappex E. Ocurrencia de contractura capsular Como complicación postquirúrgica de la mamoplastia de aumento. Trabajo final de la carrera de medicina. Universidad del Rosario. 2003. Disponible en: http://imgbiblio.vaneduc.edu.ar/fulltext/files/TC047542.pdf
Umar MR, Umar K. Low risk primary augmentation mammoplasty and capsular contracture using textured round cohesive silicone implants revisited. A long term follow up in a single surgeon's practice. Pakistan journal of plastic surgery. 2017; 5(2):6-19. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321718390_Low_Risk_Primary_Augmentation_Mammoplasty_and_Capsular_Contracture_using_Textured_Round_Cohesive_Silicone_Gel_implants_Revisited_A_Long_Term_Follow_Up_in_a_Single_Surgeon's_Practice
Blount AL, Martin M, Lineberry K, Kettaneh N, Alfonso D. Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2013;33(4):516-21. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13484465
Moreno A, Porras M, Siza K. Evaluación de la utilidad del tratamiento fisioterapéutico para el manejo de la contractura capsular en pacientes en post-operatorio en mamoplastia de aumento. Revista colombiana de rehabilitación. 2018;40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30788/RevColReh.v1.n1.2002.230
Vázquez G, Audoin F, Pellón A. Los microtraumatismos como etiología del seroma tardío en la mamoplastia de aumento. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam. 2011; 37(3):215-9. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/ibc-93510
Guidugli Dos Santos Ma, Frota Boggio R, Ribeiro Carlucci A, Motoka E, De Mendonça Albano A. Prevenção e tratamento da contratura capsular apósimplantação de prótese mamária. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2010; 25(2):304-8. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-579334
Bachour Y, Heinze Zcm, Dormaar Ts, Van Selms Wg, Ritt Mjpf, Niessen Fb. Poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants: implant dynamics and capsular contracture. European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2018;41(8):563-70. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1427-y
Benito Ruiz J, Salvador Miranda L, Manzano M. Five-year outcomes of breast augmentation with form-stable implants: periareolar vs transaxillary. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2016; 37(1):46-56. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw154
Duteille F, Perrot P, Bacheley M, Stewart S. Eight-year safety data for round and anatomical silicone gel breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2017;38(2):151-61. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx117
Hendricks H. Complete submuscular breast augmentation: 650 cases managed using an alternative surgical technique. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2007;31(2):147-53. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0128-2
Huang G, WichmannJ, Mills D. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a single surgeon’s 20-year experience. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2011;31(7):781-801. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11416936
Shi H, Cao C, Li X, Chen L, Li S. A retrospective study of primary breast augmentation: recovery period, complications and patient satisfaction. Int J Clinexp Med. 2015; 8(10):18737-43. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287546662_A_retrospective_study_of_primary_breast_augmentation_Recovery_period_complications_and_patient_satisfaction
De Lorenzi F, Gazzola R, Sangalli C, Villa O. Poly implant prothese asymmetrical anatomical breast implants: a product recall study. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2015; 135(1):25-33. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001007
Stevens Wg, Calobrace Mb, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, Zeidler Kr, D’incelli B. Nine-year core study data for sientra’sfda-approved round and shaped implants with high- strength cohesive silicone gel. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2016;36(4):404-16. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw015
Wong Ch, Samuel M, Tan Bk, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2006;118(5):1224-36. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000237013.50283.d2
Barnsley G, Sigurdson L, Barnsley S. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2006;117(7):2182-90. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000218184.47372.d5 ·
Poeppl N, Schreml S, Lichtenegger F, Lenich A, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L. Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture? Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2007;31(2):133-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0091-y
Barr S, Hill E, Bayat A. Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility. Eplasty 2009; 9:e22. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26674569_Current_Implant_Surface_Technology_An_Examination_of_Their_Nanostructure_and_Their_Influence_on_Fibroblast_Alignment_and_Biocompatibility
Hanna Kr, Tilt A, Holland M, Colen D. Reducing infectious complications in implant-based breast reconstruction: impact of early expansion and prolonged drain use. Annals of plastic surgery. 2016;76(4):s312-5. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000760
Cohen Jb, Carroll C, Tenenbaum Mm, Myckatyn Tm. Breast implant associated infections: the role of the national surgical quality improvement program and the local microbiome. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2015;136(5):921-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001682
Kot B, Binek T, Piechota M, Wolska K, Zdunek E, Platkowska K. Virulence factors and ability of staphylococci from bovine milk and the cowshed environment to biofilm formation. Polish journal of veterinary sciences. 2013;16(4):639-45. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjvs-2013-0091
Sood A, Xue Ey, Sangiovanni C, Therattil P, Lee E. Breast massage, implant displacement, and prevention of capsular contracture after breast augmentationwith implants: a review of the literature. Eplasty. 2017;17:370-7. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322624821_Breast_Massage_Implant_Displacement_and_Prevention_of_Capsular_Contracture_After_Breast_Augmentation_With_Implants_A_Review_of_the_Literature
Jeong T, Han J, Min K. Treatment of capsular contracture after breast augmentation with serial fat grafting and implantation. Arch Aesthetic Plastsurg. 2018;24(2):68-71. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2018.24.2.68