Sánchez CS, Valdez TR, Arvizu AJA, González APM, Rodríguez AC

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 43-49
PDF size: 186.58 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare obstetric and perinatal results in deliveries attended in freely chosen position and lithotomy. Material and methods: Descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study. Single pregnancies, gestational age ≥ 37 weeks, cephalic presentation, and eutocic deliveries attended at a hospital in Mexico City were included. Demographic data, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. A univariate analysis was performed, using χ² to analyze qualitative variables and Student's t or Mann-Whitney U, according to their distribution, for quantitative variables. Results: 100 patients with vaginal delivery were included, divided into two groups; the first with 44 deliveries attended in a freely chosen position compared to 56 in the lithotomy position. It was found that in the freely chosen position, they were admitted with greater cervical dilation and effacement required less obstetric analgesia (p < 0.001), less conduction of labor with oxytocin (p < 0.001), and better Apgar score at 1 minute and 5 minutes (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of the expulsive period, perineal tears, or blood loss (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The freely chosen position has no adverse maternal or neonatal consequences. The forced lithotomy position is related to interventions such as the use of oxytocin and obstetric analgesia.

REFERENCES

1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom S, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Williams obstetricia. 23a ed. México: McGraw-Hill; 2011. pp. 29-31.

2. Atwood RJ. Parturitional posture and related birth behavior. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1976; 57: 1-25.

3. Huang J, Zang Y, Ren LH, Li FJ, Lu H. A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019; 6 (4): 460-467. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.06.007.

4. Dirección General de Planeación y Desarrollo en Salud. Modelo de atención a las mujeres durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio. Enfoque humanizado, intercultural y seguro. Manual de procesos y actividades para fortalecer la sensibilización y capacitación del personal de salud, y su implantación en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. México: 2015 [Consultado en septiembre de 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/29343/GuiaImplantacionModeloParto.pdf

5. Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 5 (5): CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4.

6. Calvo AO, Flores RAL, Morales GVE. Comparison of obstetric and perinatal results of childbirth vertical position vs childbirth supine position. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013; 81 (01): 1-10.

7. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [Access September 2020]. Available in: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/

8. Vigilancia y atención amigable en el trabajo de parto en embarazo de bajo riesgo. Guía de práctica clínica: guía de evidencias y recomendaciones. México: CENETEC; 2019 [Consultado en agosto de 2020]. Disponible en: http://imss.gob.mx/profesionales-salud/gpc

9. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-007-SSA2-2016, Para la atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio, y de la persona recién nacida. [Consultado en septiembre de 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.cndh.org.mx/sites/default/files/doc/Programas/VIH/Leyes%20y%20normas%20y%20reglamentos/Norma%20Oficial%20Mexicana/NOM-007-SSA2-2016%20Embarazo%2C%20parto%20y%20puerperio.pdf

10. Moraloglu O, Kansu-Celik H, Tasci Y, Karakaya BK, Yilmaz Y, Cakir E et al. The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second stage of labor in nulliparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30 (2): 245-249. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1169525.

11. Zhang H, Huang S, Guo X, Zhao N, Lu Y, Chen M et al. A randomised controlled trial in comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes between hands-and-knees delivery position and supine position in China. Midwifery. 2017; 50: 117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.022.