2021, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2021; 35 (4)
Translation, validation and cultural adaptation of the SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) in patients with shoulder pathology
Gutiérrez-Zúñiga D, Mejía-Grueso A, Olmos-Muskus N, Valbuena-Bernal F, Largacha-Ponce LM
Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 354-358
PDF size: 166.74 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score is a brief method of evaluating patients' perception of the shoulder joint and has proven high correlation with other outcome measures that are more lengthy and time-consuming in daily practice. The SANE score to date has not been validated in Spanish.
Objective: To translate, adapt, and validate the SANE score in Spanish.
Material and methods: An initial translation and counter-translation was conducted by two bilingual evaluators and an official translator. Content validity was evaluated by a group of experts in shoulder surgery. The criteria validity was determined by determining correlation with the previously translated and validated ASES score. Reliability of the test was determined.
Results: 113 patients were evaluated, with an average age of 53.6 being 56% female. The most frequent diagnosis was rotator cuff syndrome in 78.6% followed by frozen shoulder, glenohumeral and acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and shoulder instability and acromioclavicular dislocation. Correlation between the SANE and ASES results was 0.699. The test was highly reliable with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86.
Conclusion: The SANE score is a valid and reliable patient centered outcome measure that has a good correlation with other previously validated scores in Spanish that are less practical. We present a translated valid version of the SANE score in Spanish that can be used as a patient reported outcome measure for shoulder pathologies.
REFERENCES
Rampal R, Cowling PD. Outcomes of shoulder surgery. Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(3): 200-6.
Keller RB, Rudicel SA, Liang MH. Outcomes research in orthopaedics. Instr Course Lect. 1994; 43: 599-611.
Christensen DL, Dickens JF, Freedman B, Mauntel T, Owens BD, Potter BK, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol. 2018; 100(5): 436-42.
Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ. The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ. 2010; 340: c186.
Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC. Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27(2): 214-21.
Cunningham G, Ladermann A, Denard PJ, Kherad O, Burkhart SS. Correlation Between American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score after Rotator Cuff or SLAP Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(9): 1688-92.
Retzky JS, Baker M, Hannan CV., Srikumaran U. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores correlate positively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores postoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020; 29(1): 146-9.
Gowd AK, Charles MD, Liu JN, Lalehzarian SP, Cabarcas BC, Manderle BJ, et al. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2019; 28(11): 2238-46.
Wickman JR, Lau BC, Scribani MB, Wittstein JR. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) correlates with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020; 29(2): 363-9.
O'Connor CM, Ring D. Correlation of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) with other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019; 7(4): 303-6.
Theeuwen DMJ, Van Der Steen MC, Bonneux IFM, Giesberts AME, Koot HWJ, Reijman M. Translation and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Single Assessment and Numeric Evaluation Method (SANEM) in shoulder patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1): 303.
Austin DC, Torchia MT, Werth PM, Lucas AP, Moschetti WE, Jevsevar DS. A One-Question Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Comparable to Multiple-Question Measures in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(12): 2937-43.
Shelbourne KD, Barnes AF, Gray T. Correlation of a single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) rating with modified Cincinnati knee rating system and IKDC subjective total scores for patients after ACL reconstruction or knee arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(11): 2487-91.
Bradbury M, Brosky JA, Walker JF, West K. Relationship between scores from the Knee Outcome Survey and a single assessment numerical rating in patients with patellofemoral pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013; 29(7): 531-5.
Pietrosimone B, Luc BA, Duncan A, Saliba SA, Hart JM, Ingersoll CD. Association Between the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. J Athl Train. 2017; 52(6): 526-33.
Sueyoshi T, Emoto G, Yato T. Correlation between Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score and Lysholm score in primary total knee arthroplasty patients. Arthroplast Today. 2018; 4(1): 99-102.
Thigpen CA, Shanley E, Momaya AM, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Tokish JM, et al. Validity and Responsiveness of the Single Alpha-numeric Evaluation for Shoulder Patients. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46(14): 3480-5.
Razaeian S, Wiese B, Zhang D, Krettek C, Meller R, Hawi N. Correlation between Oxford Elbow Score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: Is one simple question enough? J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020; 29(6): 1223-9.
Torchia M, Austin DC, Werth PM, Lucas AP, Moschetti WE, Jevsevar, DS. A SANE Approach to Outcome Collection? Comparing the Performance of Single- Versus Multiple-Question Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(6S): S207-S213.
Bellas N, Cirino C, Cote MP, Sathe V, Geaney L. Validation of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score as an Outcome Measure by Comparison to the Revised Foot Function Index (rFFI). Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics. 2019; 4(3): 1-5.
Martínez, J, Escobar, S, Caicedo Á, Herrera, G, Llinás, P. Validación de la versión en español de la escala de ASES. Fundación Valle de Lili, Colombia; 2016.
EVIDENCE LEVEL
II