medigraphic.com
ISSN 1028-4796 (Print)

2019, Number 4

<< Back

Rev Cubana Plant Med 2019; 24 (4)

Influence of various substrates and radiation levels on the growth of Carapichea ipecacuanha (Brot) L Andersson (ipecacuanha)

Santos RFN, Moll HC, de Oliveira E, Barreto MJ, de Barros MT, Alves LO, Rodrigues PC

Language: Portugués
References: 15
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 345.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Carapichea ipecacuanha (Brot) L Andersson (ipecacuanha) is included in the list of endangered species due to its uncontrolled extraction, fostered by the great economic potential of its emetine and cephaeline alkaloid compounds. Despite its importance, few studies have been conducted aimed at understanding the growth mechanisms involved in the sustainable production of this species, its preservation and even its repopulation in areas meeting its physiological requirements.
Objective: evaluate the growth response of ipecacuanha when subjected to different substrate compositions and shade conditions.
Methods: the study was conducted in the Gragoatá campus of the Fluminense Federal University in Niterói, RJ. Growth assays were performed with various substrates: black soil, black earth plus Bokashi®, black earth plus Bokashi® plus sand, black earth plus sand, and different shade levels: 50%, 70% and 90%.
Results: plants under 50% shading had a more positive growth response from May to October than those under 70% and 90% shading. However, from November 2014 to January 2015 plants under less than 50% shading developed symptoms of light excess, showing that in that period plants need greater shading.
Conclusions: differentiated growth of ipecacuanha under the various treatments is directly related to adjustment by the plant to temperature, as well as the substrate and the shade level. Plants under 50% shading grew fast, whereas under 90% shading there was an increase in their values due to the shady nature of the environment.


REFERENCES

  1. Kumar A, Verma JP. Does plant—Microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: A review?Microbiol Res. 2018 Mar;207:41-52. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.004

  2. Santos LW, Coelho MFB. Sombreamento e substratos na produção de mudas de Erythrina velutina Willd. Ci Fl. 2013 Out-Dez; 23:571-7. 3. Ludwig F, Fernandes DM, Guerrero AC, Bôas RLV. Características dos substratos na absorção de nutrientes e na produção de gérbera de vaso. Hortic Bras. 2014; 32:184-9.

  3. Pintó-Marijuan M, Munné-Bosch S. Photo-oxidative stress markers as a measure of abiotic stress-induced leaf senescence: advantages and limitations. J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul; 65(14):3845-57. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru086 PubMed PMID: 24683180.

  4. Juvany M, Müller M, Munné-Bosch S. Photo-oxidative stress in emerging and senescing leaves: a mirror image?. J Exp Bot. 2013 Aug; 64(11):3087-98. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert174 PubMed PMID: 23825233.

  5. Atanasov AG, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig EM, Linder T, Wawrosch C, Uhrin P, et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derivednatural products: A review. Biotech Adv. 2015 Aug 15; 33:1582-614. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001

  6. Ferreira JúniorWS, Cruz MP, Santos LL dos, Medeiros MFT.Use and importance of quina (Cinchona spp.) and ipeca (Carapichea ipecacuanha (Brot.) L. Andersson): Plants for medicinal use from the 16th century to the presente. JHer Med. 2012 Dec; 2:103-12. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2012.07.003

  7. Oliveira LO de, Rossi AAB, Martins ER, Batista FRC, Silva RS.Molecular phylogeography of Carapichea ipecacuanha, an amphitropicalshrub that occurs in the understory of both semideciduous and evergreen forests. Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr; 19(7):1410-22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04591.x.PubMed PMID:20298468

  8. Ricardo LM, Paula-Souza J de, Andrade A, Brandão MGL. Plants from the Brazilian Traditional Medicine: species from the books of the Polish physician Piotr Czerniewicz (Pedro Luiz Napoleão Chernoviz, 1812-1881). R Br Farm. 2017 Mar; 27:388-400. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2017.01.002

  9. Flumignan DL, Adami M, Faria RT de. Área foliar de folhas íntegras e danificadas de cafeeiro determinada por dimensões foliares e imagem digital. Cof Sci. 2008; 3:1-6. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.25186/cs.v3i1.67

  10. Teixeira VA. Memória cultural e propagação de ipeca [Psychotria ipecacuanha(Brot.) Stoves] em Cáceres– MT [Dissertação]. Cuiabá (MT): Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso; 2008. 12. Lameira AO. Cultivo daIpecacuanha [Psychotria ipecacuanha(Brot.) Stokes]. Belém: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental.Circular técnica; 2002. 28.

  11. Scalon SPQ, Mussury RM, Rigoni MR, Filho HS. Crescimento inicial de mudas de Bombacopsis glabra (Pasq.) A. Robyns sob condições de sombreamento. R Árv. 2003 Dez; 27:753-8. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622003000600001

  12. Costa GF, Marenco RA. Fotossíntese, condutância estomática e potencial hídrico foliar em árvores jovens de andiroba (Carapa guianensis). Acta Amaz.2007 Jun; 37:229-34. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672007000200008

  13. Lenhard NR, Paiva Neto VB de, Scalon SPQ, Alvarenga AA de. Crescimento de mudas de pau-ferro sob diferentes níveis de sombreamento. Pesq Agropec Trop. 2013; 43:178-86.

  14. Coelho MFB, Teixeira VA, Azevedo RAB, Albuquerque MCF. Propagação da poaia (Psychotria ipeca) em diferentes substratos e posicionamento das estacas. Hortic Bras.2013 Set; 31:467-71. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362013000300020

  15. Ocampo R. Ipecacuana. Un producto no maderable cultivado bajo el bosque en Costa Rica. 1980-2000. Agron Costarricense. 2007; 31(1):113-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com