medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)

2020, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2020; 39 (4)

Streptococcus mutans count on restorations made with adhesive with and without loading zinc and copper oxide nanoparticle

Alvarado C, Fernandez E, Palma FP, Chaple GAM, Vildósola GP

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1-15
PDF size: 388.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the antimicrobial properties of the incorporation of zinc and copper oxide nanoparticles in an etching and total wash adhesive on Streptococcus mutans in patients with composite resin restorations made with loaded adhesive.
Methods: Experimental and randomized trial, the sample were 25 patients, of both sexes, belonging to the FOUCH Orthodontic postgraduate program, in whom the presence of Streptococcus mutans in saliva was confirmed. Occlusal composite resin restorations were made in upper premolars with indication of extraction by orthodontic treatment, with loaded adhesive (whose composition is 5 / 0.2% ZnO and Cu respectively) and control (without the presence of nanoparticles in their composition), according to the scrambling listing. Microbiological samples were taken in three stages with the cuvette technique (before, 1 week and 4 weeks after the restoration was made). Colonies of Streptococcus mutans were obtained, isolated and identified from the samples obtained. The statistical analysis used the SPSS v.21 software, the data was analyzed by Mann Whitney test.
Results: The average CFU count of Streptococcus mutans in the experimental group (adhesive modified with zinc oxide and copper nanoparticles) was higher after the fabrication of composite resin restorations. The results of molecular identification by PCR demonstrate the presence of Streptococcus mutans in 20 of 25 samples.
Conclusions: There are no differences in the count of Streptococcus mutans before and after the application of the adhesive on the composite resin restorations.


REFERENCES

  1. Lynch CD, Opdam NJ, Hickel R, Brunton PA, Gurgan S, Kakaboura A, et al. Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section. J Dent. 2014;42(4):377-83.

  2. Kuper NK, van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, de Soet JJ, Cenci MS, et al. Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model. J Dent Res. 2015;94(1):62-8.

  3. Demarco F, Collares K, Correa M, Cenci M, Moraes R, Opdam N. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz Oral Res. 2017 [acceso: 22/03/2020];31(Suppl 1). Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000500201&lng=en&tlng=en

  4. Hashimoto M, Hirose N, Kitagawa H, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S. Improving the durability of resin-dentin bonds with an antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(4):620-7.

  5. Sabatini C, Mennito AS, Wolf BJ, Pashley DH, Renne WG. Incorporation of bactericidal poly-acrylic acid modified copper iodide particles into adhesive resins. J Dent. 2015;43(5):546-55.

  6. Cheng L, Zhang K, Weir MD, Melo MA, Zhou X, Xu HH. Nanotechnology strategies for antibacterial and remineralizing composites and adhesives to tackle dental caries. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015;10(4):627-41.

  7. Gutierrez MF, Alegria-Acevedo LF, Mendez-Bauer L, Bermudez J, Davila-Sanchez A, Buvinic S, et al. Biological, mechanical and adhesive properties of universal adhesives containing zinc and copper nanoparticles. J Dent. 2019;82:45-55.

  8. Grez PAV, Godoy EF, Fluxá PP, Moncada Cortés GA, Cury Saad JR, Casielles JM. Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2015;14(1):5-9.

  9. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91.

  10. Vildósola P, Palma P, Zuñiga P, Fernandez E, Oliveira Junior OB, Moncada G. Recovering Streptococcus mutans over restorations by the tray technique: a randomized clinical study. Braz J Oral Sci. 2013;12(4):292-7.

  11. Coykendall A. Classification and identification of the Viridans Streptococci. Clin Microbial Ver. 1989;2:315-28.

  12. Gutierrez MF, Bermudez J, Davila-Sanchez A, Alegria-Acevedo LF, Mendez-Bauer L, Hernandez M, et al. Zinc oxide and copper nanoparticles addition in universal adhesive systems improve interface stability on caries-affected dentin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;100:103366. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.024

  13. Mazzoni A, Tjaderhane L, Checchi V, Di Lenarda R, Salo T, Tay FR, et al. Role of dentin MMPs in caries progression and bond stability. J Dent Res. 2015;94(2):241-51.

  14. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(10):943-9.

  15. Vildósola Grez P, Fernandez E, Cury Saad JR, Palma Fluxá P, Chaple Gil AM, Acuña Zepeda N, et al. Decrecimiento de Streptococcus mutans después de la aplicación de sellantes en superficies oclusales de molares permanentes en adultos. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2019;56(4):12.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com