medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2021; 81 (3)

Comparison of trans and post-surgical outcomes of patients treated with laparoscopic nephrectomy vs open in a third level hospital

García-Manzano RA, García-Méndez S, Gaytán-Escobar E, Flores-Carrillo VM, Vásquez-Ciriaco S

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1-9
PDF size: 133.94 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the trans and postoperative outcomes (surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and days of hospital stay) in patients undergoing nephrectomy by open approach versus laparoscopic approach.
Material and methods: Retrospective, observational and analytical analysis; We include demographic variables, type of pathology, type of surgical approach and outcomes with descriptive statistics (measures of central tendency and dispersion) and comparative analysis between groups (x2 and Mann-Whitney U test), we consider statistically significant differences when p≤ 0.05.
Results: We analyzed files of 66 women (65.3%) and 35 men (34.7%); 66 (65.3%) had benign pathology and 35 (34.7%) with malignant pathology. Open nephrectomy was performed in 67 (66.3%) patients and laparoscopic nephrectomy in 34 (33.7%) patients. There were no differences regarding gender, age, type of pathology and surgical time. The volume of bleeding and the days of hospital stay were significantly lower in patients with laparoscopic nephrectomy (p = 0.001 and p = 0.041, respectively).
Limitations of the study or implications: Retrospective study.
Originality or value: First report that describes the postsurgical results in nephrectomies performed by open and laparoscopic approach in the south of the country.
Conclusions: Our results are consistent with current evidence regarding the benefits of laparoscopic nephrectomy over open nephrectomy.


REFERENCES

  1. Vásquez-Ciriaco S, Isla-Ortiz D, Palomeque- Lopez A, García-Espinoza JA, Jarquín-Arremilla A, Lechuga-García NA. Experiencia inicial en el tratamiento de enfermedad ginecológica benigna y maligna por laparoscopia en el Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca. Cirugía y Cirujanos. 2017;85(1):12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.circir.2016.05.004

  2. Pineda-Sotomayor R, Reyes-García IA, Aragón- Tovar A, Palacios-Saucedo GC. Nefrectomía abierta vs. laparoscópica, experiencia en un hospital de tercer nivel en el noreste de México. Rev Mex Urol 2014; 74:208–10. doi: 10.1016/ S2007-4085(15)30042-2

  3. Liu G, Ma Y, Wang S, Han X, Gao D. Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. Transl Oncol. 2017;10(4):501–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.004

  4. Rozanec JJ, Ameri C, Holst P, Featherston M, Vallone C, Atchabahián P, et al. Nefrectomía parcial a cielo abierto y laparoscópica: nuestra experiencia en 254 cirugías. Archivos Españoles de Urología. 2010;63(1):62–9.

  5. Ochoa Gutiérrez HE, Serrano Brambila EA, Moreno Palacios J, Montoya Martínez G. Comparación entre nefrectomía laparoscópica vs. abierta en el Hospital de Especialidades CMN Siglo XXI. Boletín del Colegio Mexicano de Urología. 2013;38(3):115–21.

  6. Solares-Sánchez ME, Martínez-Cervera PF, Jiménez-Rios MÁ. Nefrectomía radical laparoscópica en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71(6):338– 44.

  7. Escobar J Federico, Gaviria G Federico, Castellanos A Rafael, Aristizabal V Juan Guillermo, Arbeláez A Santiago, Ramírez Luis Fernando, et al. Nefrectomía laparoscópica, presentación de los primeros 100 casos. Revista Urología Colombiana. 15(2):1-10.

  8. Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006124.pub2

  9. Bayrak O, Seckiner I, Erturhan S, Cil G, Erbagci A, Yagci F. Comparison of the complications and the cost of open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in renal tumors larger than 7 centimeters. Urol J. 2014;11(1):1222–7.

  10. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA. A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour. BJU Int. 2005;95(7):1039–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05461.x

  11. Komyakov BK, Guliev BG, Novikov AI, Yagubov KK. [Results of open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal cancer]. Urologiia. 2017;(6):91–5.

  12. Jeon SH, Kwon TG, Rha KH, Sung GT, Lee W, Lim JS, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi-center results. BJU Int. 2011;107(5):817–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09688.x

  13. Wang D, Xiao Z, Shou J, Li C, Xing N. Comparison of Laparoscopy and Open Radical Nephrectomy of Renal Cell Cancer. Open Med (Wars). 2019; 14:392–7. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0040

  14. Gutiérrez Sanz-Gadea C, Mus Malleu A, Briones Mardones G, Hidalgo Pardo F, Rebassa Llull M, Conde Santos G. Nefrectomía laparoscópica mano-asistida. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2006;30(7):698–706.

  15. Solís Rodríguez JA, García Vásquez RA, Arriaga Aguilar J, Candia Plata MC, Chavarría Guevara J. Comparación de resultados por técnica laparoscópica y abierta en el Hospital General del Estado de Sonora. Bol Coleg Mex Urol. 2015;30(1):26–3




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com