medigraphic.com
Coordinación General de Investigación de la Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición y la Dirección General de Sistemas e Informática de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Salud Publica Nutr 2021; 20 (3)

Undernutrition in newly diagnosed patients with gynaecological cancer

Brito-Alvarez M, Romero-Lagunes ML, Hernández-Barajas D, Tavitas-Herrera SE, Martínez-González GI

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 26-35
PDF size: 310.13 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The incidence and prevalence of gynecological cancer in our country continues to grow and with it malnutrition and its complications, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a tool that identifies patients at risk of malnutrition/moderate malnutrition and severe malnutrition (Category B/C) that requires nutritional intervention. Objective: To determine the of malnutrition in patients newly diagnosed with gynecological cancer. Material and method: Cross-sectional, exploratory, descriptive, correlational study that included 64 patients ›20 years newly diagnosed with cervical cancer (CaCu), endometrium (CaE), ovary (CaO) and vulvar (CaV), without treatment. We evaluated PG-SGA, albumin, % weight loss (%PP). Data collected in Excel 2011 and analyzed in IBM Statistics 23. Results: PG-SGA reported 25% of patients in (Category B) and 29.7% (Category C). BMI identified 6.3% with malnutrition. The percentage PP in 1 and 6 months was higher in Category B/C (p 0.000), the PG-SGA in category B and C presented greater correlation with increase of %PP, decreased albumin and symptomatology in the oncological patient. Conclusions: The PG-SGA reported 29.7% in malnutrition while the BMI reported 6.3%, this tool identifies patients with gynecological cancer at risk of malnutrition and/or malnutrition (54.68%) who require nutritional intervention.


REFERENCES

  1. Bauer, J., Capra, S., & Ferguson, M. (2002). Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 56(8), 779–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412

  2. Castillo-Martínez, L., Castro-Eguiluz, D., Copcaek-Mendoza, E. T., Pérez-Camargo, D. A., Reyes-Torres, C. A., Damasco-Ávila, E. A., López-Córdova, G., Fuentes-Hernández, M. R., Cetina-Pérez, L., & Milke-García, M. del P. (2018). Nutritional Assessment Tools for the Identification of Malnutrition and Nutritional Risk Associated with Cancer Treatment. Revista de Investigación Clínica, 70(3), 906. https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.18002524

  3. Das U., Patel S., Dave K. & Bhansali R. (2014). Assessment of nutritional status of gynecological cancer cases in India and comparison of subjective and objective nutrition assessment parameters. South Asian Journal of Cancer. Volume 3-Issue (1) DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.126518.

  4. Detsky A., McLaughlin J., Baker J., Johnston N., Whittaker S., Mendelson R. & Jeejeebhoy K. (1987). What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 11, 8 – 13.

  5. Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2014). Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en Materia de Investigación. Obtenido de: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/rlgsmis.html

  6. Frisancho, A. (1981). New norms of upper limb fat and muscles areas for assessment of nutritional status. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 34(11), 2540–2545.

  7. Gutiérrez J., Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, Romero-Martínez M, Hernández-Ávila M (2012). Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX), 2012. ISBN 978-607-511-037-0. Obtenido de: https://ensanut.insp.mx/informes/ENSANUT2012ResultadosNacionales.pdf

  8. INEGI (2018). Estadísticas a propósito del día mundial contra el cáncer (4 de febrero). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Obtenido de: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/aproposito/2018/cancer2018_nal.pdf

  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2020). GLOBOCAN 2020: Cancer Today. Obtenido de: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/fact-sheets-cancers

  10. Jager-Wittenaar, H., & Ottery, F. D. (2017). Assessing nutritional status in cancer: Role of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 20(5), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000389

  11. Kłek, S., Jankowski, M., Kruszewski, W. J., Fijuth, J., Kapała, A., Kabata, P., Rutkowski, P. (2015). Clinical nutrition in oncology: Polish recommendations. Oncology in Clinical Practice, 11(4), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2015.0062

  12. Laky, B., Janda, M., Cleghorn, G., & Obermair, A. (2008). Comparison of different nutritional assessments and body-composition measurements in detecting malnutrition among gynecologic cancer patients. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87, 1678–1685. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i26.3310.

  13. Marian M. & Roberts S. (2010). Clinical Nutrition for Oncology Patients. Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Capítulo 2-3. Pp. 21-65.

  14. Martínez Roque, V. R. (2007). Valoración del Estado de Nutrición en el Paciente con Cáncer. Cancerología, 2(22), 315–326.

  15. Ottery, F. D. (1996). Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition, 12(1), S15–S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-9007(95)00067-4

  16. Santos Rodrigues, C., & Villaça Chaves, G. (2015). Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment in relation to site, stage of the illness, reason for hospital admission, and mortality in patients with gynecological tumors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23(3), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2409-7

  17. Shamah-Levy T, Vielma-Orozco E, Heredia-Hernández O, Romero-Martínez M, Mojica-Cuevas J, Cuevas-Nasu L, Santaella-Castell JA, Rivera-Dommarco J. (2020) Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2018-19: Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX). ISBN 978-607-511-205-3. Obtenido de: https://ensanut.insp.mx/encuestas/ensanut2018/doctos/informes/ensanut_2018_informe_final.pdf

  18. Thompson, K. L., Elliott, L., Fuchs-Tarlovsky, V., Levin, R. M., Voss, A. C., & Piemonte, T. (2017). Oncology Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline for Adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(2), 297-310.e47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.05.010 Valenzuela-Landaeta, K., Rojas, P., & Basfi-fer, K. (2012). Evaluación nutricional del paciente con cáncer. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 27(2), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2012.27.2.5525

  19. Vázquez de la Torre, M. J., Stein, K., Vásquez Garibay, E. M., Kumazawa Ichikawa, M. R., Troyo Sanromán, R., Salcedo Flores, A. G., & Sánchez Zubieta, F. A. (2017). Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment of nutritional status in pediatric patients with recent cancer diagnosis. Nutrición Hospitalaria. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.935

  20. White, J. V., Guenter, P., Jensen, G., Malone, A., & Schofield, M. (2012). Consensus statement: Academy of nutrition and dietetics and American society for parenteral and enteral nutrition: Characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 36(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607112440285




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com