medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2020, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2020; 59 (4)

Immediate breast reconstruction at the National Institute of Oncology and Radiobiology of Cuba

Sánchez WL, Alfonso HL, Sánchez VIG, Ramos OM, Ropero TRJ

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 1-18
PDF size: 622.66 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction reduces the psychological impact of breast cancer and improves the quality of life of patients.
Objective: To assess symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction at the of Cuba.
Method: An analytical and prospective study of incident cohort was carried out in the reconstructive surgery service at the National Institute of Oncology and Radiobiology (INOR), from 2014 to 2017. Forty-one patients who consented to participate in the study were included. Demographic and oncoreconstructive variables were collected. A software created in the institution was used to assess breast symmetry. The data were collected from the medical histories. The corrected chi-square test and odds ratio were applied for statistical analysis.
Results: 30.2% of women who received reconstruction belonged to the age group 30-39 years; 46.3% were overweight. The best symmetry was found with oncoplastic techniques (31.7%), followed by skin-sparing mastectomy. The tissue expansion technique with mastectomy presented greater complications (63.6%) and less symmetry. Partial skin necrosis was the major complication, accounting for 7.3% of the cases, and was related to skin-sparing techniques.
Conclusions: Objectively evaluating breast symmetry allowed us to know the effectiveness of reconstructive surgical techniques. With oncoplastic surgery and skin-sparing mastectomy techniques, the best aesthetic outcomes and few complications were obtained. Immediate breast expansion with a modified radical mastectomy offers no benefit.


REFERENCES

  1. Peiris L, Olson D, Kelly D. Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery in Canada: breaking new ground in general surgical training. Canadian journal of surgery Journal canadien de chirurgie. 2018;61(5):294-9.

  2. Kronowitz SJ. State of the art and science in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015;135(4):755e-71e.

  3. Kim MK, Kim T, Moon HG, Jin US, Kim K, Kim J, et al. Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2015;41(3):426-32.

  4. Carrillo G, Rodríguez G. Reconstrucción mamaria postmastectomía con implante de silicona: a propósito de 12 casos (resultados preliminares). Rev Cubana Oncol. 1998;14(2):91-101

  5. Sánchez L. Reconstrucción mamaria en pacientes con patología mamaria. Rev Cubana Cir. 2013 [acceso 20/06/2019];52(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932013000200009&lng=es

  6. MINSAP. Anuario estadístico de salud. La Habana. Cuba: Dirección de registros médicos y estadísticas de salud; 2018

  7. Sánchez L, Ortiz H, Reyes P, Cárdenas I, Mestre B. La reconstrucción mamaria posmastectomía con colgajo miocutáneo de dorsal ancho y expansión tisular. Rev Cubana Cir. 2017 acceso 20/06/2019;56(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932017000300003&lng=es

  8. Sánchez L, Acosta C, Vera OL, Lence JJ, Marcasciano M. Nueva metodología para medir simetría frontal enpacientes reconstruidas por cáncer de mama. Rev Senol Patol Mamar: 2019;32(4):139

  9. World Medical Association (AMM). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013;310(20):2191-4.

  10. Morrow M, Li Y, Alderman AK, Jagsi R, Hamilton AS, Graff JJ, et al. Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA surgery. 2014;149(10):1015-21.

  11. Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Agarwal J. An analysis of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction frequency using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. The breast journal. 2011;17(4):352-8.

  12. Sánchez L, Mestre B, Galán Y. Reconstrucción mamaria posmastectomía en el Instituto Nacional de Oncología y Radiobiología de Cuba (2008-2012). Rev Cubana Cir. 2014 acceso 20/06/2019;53(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932014000100007&lng=es

  13. Rodríguez S, Capurso M. Epidemiología del cáncer de mama. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006;74:585-93.

  14. Guo R, Si J, Xue J, Su Y, Mo M, Yang B, et al. Changing patterns and survival improvements of young breast cancer in China and SEER database, 1999-2017. Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31(4):653-662.

  15. Anuario Estadístico de Salud. 2019. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. 2020. p. 101-106.

  16. American Society of Plastic Surgeon. 2018 Plastic Surgery Statistics. 2018 [acceso 14/06/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics

  17. Censo de Población y Vivienda. Cuba-2012. El color de la piel según Censo de Población y Vivienda. Centro de Estudios de Población y Desarrollo. Cuba: Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información; 2016. p. 10.

  18. Troester M, Sun X, Allott E, Gerardts J, Cohen S, Tse Ch, et al. Racial Differences in PAM50 Subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(2):176-82.

  19. Chiu AS, Thomas P, Killelea BK, Horowitz N, Chagpar AB, Lannin DR, et al. Regional variation in breast cancer surgery: Results from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Am J Surg. 2017;214(5):907-13.

  20. Aguilar MJ, González E, García AP, Ferré J, Padilla CA. Obesidad y su implicación en el cáncer de mama. Nutr Hosp. 2011;26(4):899-903.

  21. Ferri N, Ferria F, Ferria FA, Brunicardi R, Franco A, Franco A, et al. Cáncer de mama e índice de masa corporal en mujeres posmenopáusicas. Rev Venez Oncol. 2010;22(2):94-102.

  22. Sánchez L, Gómez PP, Azaín ME, Chang A, Váldez O, Ropero RdJ, et al. Reconstrucción mamaria con el uso de expansores tisulares. Rev Cubana Cir. 2020;59(2):e_952.

  23. Sergesketter AR, Thomas SM, Lane WO, Orr JP, Shammas RL, Fayanju OM, et al. Decline in Racial Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis from 1998 to 2014. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019;143(6):1560-70.

  24. Gibreel WO, Day CN, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, Habermann EB, Hieken TJ, et al. Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Cancer in the Elderly: A National Cancer Data Base Study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2017;224(5):895-905.

  25. Obasi J. Micropigmentación of the nipple-areola complex after Brest cancer reconstruction surgery. Oxford Medical Case Reports. 2019;8:367-68.

  26. Fernández R, Fernández J, Martínez JR, Bravo E, García M, Miralles S, et al. Reconstrucción del complejo areola-pezón: revisión de 60 casos. Cir.plást.iberolatinoam. 2007;33(2):97-104.

  27. Agha RA, Omran Y, Wellstead G, Sagoo H, Barai I, Rajmohan S, et al. Systematic review of therapeautic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open. 2019;3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50119

  28. Mesdag V, Régis C, Tresch E, Chauvet P, Boulanger L, Collinet P, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer is associated with high patiemt satisfaction and safe oncological outcomes. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(8):637-42.

  29. Alarcón M, Buch E, Ibañez A, Zorraquino E, Ramirez J, Díaz S, et al. Mastectomía ahorradora de piel y complejo areola-pezón con reconstrucción inmediata: una técnica en auge en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama. Rev Senol Patol Mamar. 2018;31(3)94-101.

  30. Woonthyeok J, Seongwon L. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps. The Breast. 2018;38:45-51.

  31. Ogita M, Nagura N, Kawamori J, In R, Yoshida A, Yamauchi H, et al. Risk factors for complications among breast cancer patients treated with post-mastectomy radiotherapy and immediate tissue-expander/permanent implant reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer. 2018;25(2):167-69.

  32. Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Kim JY, Dumanian GA, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD, et al. Analysis of risk factors for complications in expander/implant breast reconstruction by stage of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(5):692-99.

  33. Kato H, Nakagami G, Iwahira Y, Otani R, Nagase T, Iizaka S, et al. Risk factors and risk scoring tool for infection during tissue expansion in tissue expander and implant breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2013;19(6):618-26.

  34. Sánchez L, Lence JJ, Villegas C. Satisfacción con los resultados estéticos de la reconstrucción mamaria posmastectomía, en el Instituto Nacional de Oncología y Radiobiología (INOR) de Cuba, mediante el cuestionario Breast -Q. Rev Senol Patol Mamar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.senol.2020.07.005

  35. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Signoretti M, Persichetti P. Analysis of Symmetry Stability Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Contralateral Management in 582 Patients with Long-Term Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(4):936-40.

  36. Svee A, Mani M, Sandquist K, Audolfsson T, Folkvaljon Y, Isern AE, et al. Survival and risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. The British journal of surgery. 2018;105(11):1446-53.

  37. O' Halloran N, McVeigh T, Martin J, Keane M, Lowery A, Kerin M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and breast reconstruction: the potential for improved outcomes in the treatment of breast cancer. Irish journal of medical science. 2019;188(1):75-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com