2020, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2020; 59 (3)
Outcomes of surgical treatment of pressure ulcers using local flaps
Siñani DWR, Cairos BJN, Tamayo CAM
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 490.56 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Pressure ulcers are continuity solutions that appear on the skin that covers bony prominences, when these bear continuous external pressure that interferes with correct blood circulation and nutrition of tissues.
Objective:
To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment of pressure ulcers using different types of local flaps.
Methods:
A descriptive, ambispective and longitudinal study was carried out. The population consisted of all the patients who presented diagnosis of pressure ulcer with surgical criteria. The sample consisted of 72 patients, with a total of 84 pressure ulcers, who met the inclusion criteria.
Results:
The male sex predominated in the study, together with the age range 19-29 years. Sacral ulcers were the most frequent and largest, and the most used flap for closure was the rotation and advancement flap. Satisfactory outcomes were obtained in 82.5% of the cases.
Conclusions:
Adequate tissue coverage and padding of the area was achieved, as well as the absence of complications that interfered with the final outcomes.
REFERENCES
Andrade P. Úlceras por presión, Coiffman Cirugía Plástica Reconstructiva y Estética. 3ra. Ed. Tomo IV (primera parte); 2008. p. 3200-217.
Alfonso Coto JC. Cirugía reconstructiva de las úlceras por presión. Rev Cubana Cir. 2007 Sep [acceso 22/07/2019];46(3):0 Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932007000300004&lng=es
Bamba R, Madden JJ, Hoffman AN, Kim JS, Thayer WP, Nanney LB, et al. Flap Reconstruction for Pressure Ulcers: An Outcomes Analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2017;5(1):e1187. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1097/GOX.0000000000001187
Alvin C, Kwork MD, Andrew M, Simpson MD, James Willcockson MD, Daniel P, et al. Complications and their associations following the surgical repair of pressure ulcers, The American Journal of Surgery. 2018;216(6):1177-181. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1016/j.amjsurg.201801.012
Tran BNN, Chen AD, Kamali P, Singhal D, Lee BT, Fukudome EY, et al. National perioperative outcomes of flap coverage for pressure ulcers from 2005 to 2015 using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement program. Arch of plast surg. 2018;45(5):418-424. DOI: https://doi.org.10.5999/aps.20118.00262
Tashiro J, Gerth DJ, Thaller SR. Pedicled Flap Reconstruction for Patients with Pressure Ulcers, Complications and Resource Utilization by Ulcer Site. JAMA Surgery. 2016;151(1):93-94. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3228
Gargano F, Edstrom L, Szymanski K, Schmidt S, Bevivino J, Zienowicz Ret al. Improving Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction: Our Protocol and the COP (Cone of Pressure) Flap. Plastic reconstructive surgery Global Open. 2017;5(3):e1234. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1097/GOX.0000000000001234
Bhattacharya S, Mishra RK. Pressure ulcers: Current understanding and newer modalities of treatment. Indian Journal of plastic surgery. 2015;48(1):4-16. DOI: https://doi.org.10.4103/0970-0358.155260
Sanaullah A, Ahmed MH. ¿What the future holds for the primary surgical repair as treatment of a massive pressure ulcer? Annals of Translational Medicine. 2019;7(1):21. DOI: https://doi.org.10.21037/atm.2018.11.42
Liu X, Lu W, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Yang X, Liao S, et al. Application of gluteus maximus fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap combined with resection in sacrococcygeal pressure ulcers. Medicine. 2017;96(47):e8826. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1097/MD.0000000000008829
Shafipour V, Ramezanpour E, Gorji MA, Moosazadeh M. Prevalence of postoperative pressure ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Electronic Physician. 2018;8(11):3107-76. DOI: https://doi.org.10.19082/3170
Haiun M, Feuvrier D, Bayti T, Pluvy I. Surgical management of a series of pressure ulcers: Report of 61 cases. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique. 2016;61(6):836-44. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1016/j.anplas.2016.08.002