medigraphic.com

2020, Número 1

<< Anterior

Vet Mex 2020; 7 (1)


Cow-calf management practices in Mexico: Reproduction and breeding

Lassala A, Hernández-Cerón J, Pedernera M, González-Padilla E, Gutiérrez CG

Idioma: Español/Inglés
Referencias bibliográficas: 24
Paginas: 1-15
Archivo PDF: 249.92 Kb.


RESUMEN

Sin resumen.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Martinez R, Lowe K, Ramirez Godinez JA. Bull reproductive evaluation under range management in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. 1989. Available from: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=MX8980020

  2. Coordinación de Ganadería. SAGARPA. Seguimiento técnico de la situación reproductiva de los inventarios de bovinos de carne y doble propósito de los beneficiarios del componente producción pecuaria sustentable y ordenamiento ganadero y producción sustentable y ordenamiento ganadero y apícola (PROGAN). México: SAGARPA; 2012.

  3. White RR, Brady M, Capper JL, McNamara JP, Johnson KA. Cow–calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems. J Animal Sci. 2015;93(6) 3197–211. https:// doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8800.

  4. USDA. Beef 2007-08. Beef Cow-calf Management Practices in the United States, 2008. Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/ animalhealth/monitoring-and-surveillance/nahms/nahms_beef_ cowcalf_studies

  5. González-Padilla E, Lassala A, Pedernera M, Gutierrez CG. Cow-calf management practices in Mexico: Farm organization and infrastructure. Vet México OA. 2019;6(3).

  6. VSN International. Genstat for Windows. 19th ed. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International; 2017.

  7. García E. Modificaciones al Sistema de clasificación climática de Koppen. 5ª ed. México: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM; 2004.

  8. Índice de marginación municipal. Consejo Nacional de Población, 2013. Available from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Indices_de_ Marginacion_Publicaciones

  9. Enríquez de la Fuente BA, Galin CS, Navarro R, Gutiérrez AC. Estimación de la época más propicia para un empadre estacional en ganado cebú bajo condiciones de trópico húmedo. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. 1993;2(2)101-14.

  10. Towers J, Mainland I, Montgomery J, Bond J. Calving seasonality at Pool, Orkney during the first millennium AD: an investigation using intra-tooth isotope ratio analysis of cattle molar enamel. Environmental Archaeology. 2017;22(1):40- 55. doi: 10.1080/14614103.2015.1116214.

  11. Bó GA, Baruselli PS, Mapletoft RJ. Synchronization techniques to increase the utilization of artificial insemination in beef and dairy cattle. Anim Reprod. 2013;10(3):137-42.

  12. Baruselli PS, Ferreira RM, Sá Filho MF, Bó GA. Review: Using artificial insemination v. natural service in beef herds. Animal. 2018;12:S45-52. doi: 10.1017/ S175173111800054X

  13. Gasser CL. Considerations on puberty in replacement beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:1336-40.

  14. Galina CS, Arthur G.H. Review of cattle reproduction in the tropics. Part 1. Puberty and age at first calving. Animal Breeding Abstracts. 1989;57:583-90.

  15. D’Occhio MJ, Baruselli PS, Campanile G. Influence of nutrition, body condition, and metabolic status on reproduction in female beef cattle: A review. Theriogenology. 2019;125:277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.010.

  16. Morrison DG, Spitzer JC, Perkins JL. Influence of prepartum body condition score change on reproduction in multiparous beef cows calving in moderate body condition. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:1048-54.

  17. Small-scale U.S. Cow-calf Operations. USDA APHIS. 2011. Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/smallscale/downloads/ Small_scale_beef.pdf.

  18. Ungerfeld R, Quintans G, Hötzel M. Minimizing cows’ stress when calves were early weaned using the two-step method with nose flaps. Animal. 2016;10(11):1871-6. doi:10.1017/S1751731116000793.

  19. Lippolis KD, Ahola JK, Mayo CE, Fischer MC, Callan RJ. Effects of two-stage weaning with nose flap devices applied to calves on cow body condition, calf performance, and calf humoral immune response. J Animal Sci. 2016;94(2):816-23. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9624

  20. Quintans G, Banchero G, Carriquiry M, López-Mazz C, Baldi F. Effect of body condition and suckling restriction with and without presence of the calf on cow and calf performance. Anim Prod Sci. 2010:50:931-8. doi.org/10.1071/AN10021

  21. Orihuela A, Galina CS. Effects of separation of cows and calves on reproductive performance and animal welfare in tropical beef cattle. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(5):E223. doi: 10.3390/ani9050223.

  22. Hernández Cerón J, Lassala A, Pedernera M, González-Padilla E, Gutiérrez GC. Manejo reproductivo del ganado bovino en sistemas de producción de carne en méxico. Reproductive management in cow-calf beef production units in mexico. Reunión Nacional de Investigación Pecuaria. Memoria, Vol. 1. 2018. p. 100-2.

  23. Camacho SJ, Ramírez GS, Aguilar MP. Capacidad reproductiva de sementales en fincas ganaderas de Costa Rica. Revista UTN. 2017;80:46-50.

  24. Kennedy SP, Spitzer JC, Hopkins FM, Higdon HL, Bridges WC Jr. Breeding soundness evaluations of 3,648 yearling beef bulls using the 1993 Society for Theriogenology guidelines. Theriogenology. 2002;58:947-61.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com