Cervantes-Arriaga A, Rodríguez-Violante M

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 49
Paginas: 95-103
Archivo PDF: 485.22 Kb.

RESUMEN

Los Cursos de Alta Especialidad en Medicina consisten en programas académicos encaminados al desarrollo de competencias específicas en médicos especialistas. El objetivo central de este trabajo es presentar el diseño curricular del Curso de Alta Especialidad de Enfermedad de Parkinson y Trastornos del Movimiento. Entendiendo que cada curso debe adecuarse a las necesidades propias del campo de conocimiento, se presenta el estado actual del programa curricular del curso destacando objetivos cognoscitivos, psicomotores y afectivos, junto con su marco teórico. Se describen brevemente estrategias y recursos pedagógicos y su aplicación en el desarrollo del curso; también se describen diversas metodologías para la evaluación de objetivos, habilidades procedimentales y clínicas. Finalmente, se hace mención de la integración de tecnologías de Información y Comunicación como portafolios electrónicos y el e-learning. Los métodos, estrategias o su teoría pueden integrarse o adaptarse a otros programas de cursos de alta especialidad con la finalidad de mejorar el proceso de aprendizaje, pero también el de la enseñanza.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Diaz-Barriga F, Lule ML, Pacheco, D, Saad E, Rojas-Drummond S. 1990. Metodología de diseño curricular para educación superior. México: Trillas. 175 p.

2. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, Cruikshank KA, Mayer RE, Pintrich PR, Raths J, Wittrock MC. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. 1st Ed. New York, NY: Longman. 336 p.

3. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/ performance. Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7.

4. Peña A. The Dreyfus model of clinical problem-solving skills acquisition: a critical perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010;15:1

5. Gleason BL, Peeters MJ, Resman-Targoff BH, Karr S, McBane S, Kelley K, Thomas T, Denetclaw TH. An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Nov 10;75(9):186.

6. Stuart J, Rutherford RJ. Medical student concentration during lectures.Lancet 1978;2(8088):514-16.

7. KL Ruhl, CA Hughes. Using the Pause Procedure to Enhance Lecture Recall. TESE. 1987;10:14-8.

8. Bachhel R, Thaman RG. Effective use of pause procedure to enhance student engagement and learning. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Aug;8(8):1-3.

9. Ramani S, Mann K, Taylor D, Thampy H. Residents as teachers: Near peer learning in clinical work settings: AMEE Guide No. 106. Med Teach. 2016 Jul;38(7):642-55.

10. Sadeghi R, Sedaghat MM, Sha Ahmadi F. Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students’ learning and satisfaction. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014 Oct;2(4):146-50.

11. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 4;18(1):e2.

12. Sajid MR, Laheji AF, Abothenain F, Salam Y, AlJayar D, Obeidat A. Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia? Int J Med Educ. 2016 Sep 4;7:281-5.

13. Alguire PC. A review of journal clubs in postgraduate medical educa-tion. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(5):347-353.

14. Deenadayalan Y, Grimmer-Somers K, Prior M, Kumar S. How to run an effective journal club: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):898-911.

15. Lewinski P. Effects of classrooms’ architecture on academic performance in view of telic versus paratelic motivation: a review. Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:746.

16. Zomorodian K, Parva M, Ahrari I, Tavana S, Hemyari C, Pakshir K, Jafari P, Sahraian A. The effect of seating preferences of the medical students on educational achievement. Med Educ Online. 2012;17.

17. Grzeskowiak LE, Thomas AE, To J, Phillips AJ, Reeve E. Enhancing Education Activities for Health Care Trainees and Professionals Using Audience Response Systems: A Systematic Review. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Fall; 35(4):261-9.

18. Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: a learnercentered model for outpatient education. Acad Med. 2003 Sep;78(9):893-8

19. Barangard H, Afshari P, Abedi P. The effect of the SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select) method versus teacher-centered education on the clinical gynecology skills of midwifery students in Iran. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Nov 15;13:41.

20. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Kalraiya A, Longia S. Use of SNAPPS Model for Pediatric Outpatient Education. Indian Pediatr. 2017 Apr 15;54(4):288-90.

21. Connor DF, Pearson GS. Feasibility and Implementation of SNAPPS in an Outpatient Child Psychiatry Clinic. Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;41(2):299-300.

22. Swartz MK. Revisiting “The One-Minute Preceptor”. J Pediatr Health Care. 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):95-6.

23. Rashid P, Churchill JA, Gendy R. Improving clinical teaching for busy clinicians: integration of the one-minute preceptor into mini-clinical examination. ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jul;87(7-8):535-6.

24. Seki M, Otaki J, Breugelmans R, Komoda T, Nagata- Kobayashi S, Akaishi Y, Hiramoto J, Ohno I, Harada Y, Hirayama Y, Izumi M. How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes?--SNAPPS and the One-Minute preceptor. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 13;16:12.

25. Wolpaw T, Papp KK, Bordage G. Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties: a randomized comparison group trial. Acad Med. 2009 Apr; 84(4):517-24.

26. Soler Fernández R, Méndez Díaz C, Rodríguez García E. Continuing medical education: how to write multiple choice questions. Radiologia. 2013 Jun;55 Suppl 1:S28-36.

27. Abdulghani HM, Irshad M, Haque S, Ahmad T, Sattar K, Khalil MS. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185895

28. Tarrant M, Ware J. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Aug;30(6): 539-43.

29. Redmond SP, Hartigan-Rogers JA, Cobbett S. High time for a change: psychometric analysis of multiple-choice questions in nursing. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2012 Nov 26;9.

30. Harris BH, Walsh JL, Tayyaba S, Harris DA, Wilson DJ, Smith PE. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8.

31. Aba Alkhail B. Near-peer-assisted learning (NPAL) in undergraduate medical students and their perception of having medical interns as their near peer teacher. Med Teach. 2015 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S33-9.

32. Barsoumian AE, Yun HC.Augmenting Fellow Education Through Spaced Multiple-Choice Questions. Mil Med. 2018 Jan 1;183(1-2):e122-e126.

33. Knox JD. What is ... a modified essay question? Med Teach. 1989;11(1):51-7.

34. Khan MU, Aljarallah BM. Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2011 Jan;5(1):39-43.

35. Tervo RC, Dimitrievich E, Trujillo AL, Whittle K, Redinius P, Wellman L. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in the clinical clerkship: an overview. S D J Med. 1997 May;50(5):153-6.

36. Roberts NK, Williams RG, Kim MJ, Dunnington GL. The briefing, intraoperative teaching, debriefing model for teaching in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2008;208: 299-303.

37. Raszka WV, Maloney CG, Hanson JL. Getting off to a good start: Discussing goals and expectations with medical students. Pediatrics. 2010;126:193-5.

38. Ahmed M, Arora S, Russ S, Darzi A, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Operation debrief: A SHARP improvement in performance feedback in the operating room. Ann Surg 2013;258:958-63.

39. Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J, Nestel D, Runnacles J, Hull L, et al. Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD): Bringing Science to the Art of Debriefing in Surgery. Ann Surg 2012;256:982-8.

40. Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999 Nov;74(11):1203-7.

41. Joshi R, Ling FW, Jaeger J. Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents’ competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 2004 May;79(5):458-63.

42. Sorg JC, Wilson RD, Perzynski AT, Tran D, Vargo MM. Simplifying the 360-degree peer evaluation in a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;91(9):797-803

43. Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):685-95.

44. Hilton SR, Slotnick HB. Proto-professionalism: how professionalisation occurs across the continuum of medical education. Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):58-65.

45. O’Sullivan H, van Mook W, Fewtrell R, Wass V. Integrating professionalism into the curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 61. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e64-77.

46. Heeneman S, Driessen EW. The use of a portfolio in postgraduate medical education - reflect, assess and account, one for each or all in one? GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;34(5): Doc57.

47. Sangrà A, Vlachopoulos D, Cabrera N. Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: an approach to the conceptual framework. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2012 Apr 13;13(2):145.

48. de Leeuw RA, Walsh K, Westerman M, Scheele F. Consensus on Quality Indicators of Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Delphi Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Apr 26;4(1):e13

49. Díaz-Barriga F. La evaluación auténtica centrada en el desempeño: una alternativa para evaluar el aprendizaje y la enseñanza. En Enseñanza situada,. México: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 150-154.