Ramírez BJC

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 62
Paginas: 19-45
Archivo PDF: 775.17 Kb.

RESUMEN

El objetivo de este artículo es analizar las indicaciones para la selección adecuada de restauraciones parciales de cerámica adhesiva tipo Onlay, proporcionando el protocolo clínico paso a paso para su correcta aplicación. Principios biomecánicos basados en consideraciones morfológicas y términos geométricos, deberán estar presentes para la cuidadosa preparación de cavidades tipo Onlay. Se discuten conceptos sobre las preparaciones cavitarias bajo condiciones esenciales en la preservación de tejido dental sano, sin compromiso de cúspides de soporte o vertientes que comprometan el resultado final de la restauración en condiciones funcionales y estéticas debidamente planificadas. La sugerencia del autor es respetar y seguir de forma puntual cada uno de los pasos aplicados en el protocolo clínico restaurador, para mejorar el resultado final de las restauraciones en los casos clínicos personalizados.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Morimoto, F. B. W. Rebello de Sampaio, M.M. Braga, N. Sesma, M. Özcan5 Journal of Dental Research 2016, Vol. 95 (9) 985-994.

2. Fennis W. M., Kuijs R. H., Roeters F. J., Creughers N. H. Kreulen CM. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 36-41.

3. Laegreid T., Gjerdet N. R., Johansson A. K. Extensive composite molar restora- tions: 3 years clinical evaluation. Acta Odontol Scand 2012; 70: 344-352.

4. Scholtanus J. D., Özcan M. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. J Dent 2014; 42: 1404-1410.

5. Opdam N. J., van de Sande F. H., Bronkhorst E., Cenci M. S., Bottenberg P., Pal- lesen U., Gaengler P., Lindberg A., Huysmans M. C., van Dijken J. W. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 943-949.

6. van de Sande F. H., Opdam N. J., Da Rosa Rodolpho P. A., Correa M. B., De- marco F. F., Cenci M. S. Patient risk factors’ influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res 2013; 92: 78S-83S.

7. Arnetzl G. V., Arnetzl G. Reliability of nonretentive all-ceramic CAD/CAM overlays. Int J Comput Dent 2012; 15: 185-197.

8. Beier U. S., Kapferer I., Burtscher D., Giesinger J., Dumfahrt H. Clinical per- formance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 395-402.

9. Belleflamme M. M., Geerts S. O., Louwette M. M., Grenade C. F., Vanheusden A. J., Mainjot A. K. No post-no core approach to restore severly damaged poste- rior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases; J Dent 2017; 63: 1-7.

10. Belli R., Petschelt A., Hofner B., Hajto J., Sherrer S. S., Lohbauer U. Fracture Rates and lifetime estimations of CAD/CAM all-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 67-73.

11. Federlin M., Hiller K. A., Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective clinical split- mouth study of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns: 5.5 years. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 161-167.

12. Felden A., Schmalz G., Hiller K. A. Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4: 199-205.

13. Frankenberger R., Taschner M., Garcia-Godoy F., Petschelt A., Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 393-398.

14. Guess P. C., Selz C. F., Steinhart Y. N., Stampf S., Strub J. R. Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD/CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 21-25.

15. Krämer N., Taschner M., Lohbauer U., Petschelt A., Frankenberger R. Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 307-314.

16. Morimoto S., Rebello de Sampaio F. B. W., Braga M. M., Sesma N., Özcan M. Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: A system- atic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 985-994.

17. Van Dijken J. W. V., Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of exten- sive dentin-enamel bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 929-939.

18. Dietschi D., Spreafico R. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical perspectives and clinical ratio- nale for a biosubstitutive approach. Int J Esthet Dent 2015; 10: 210-227.

19. Rocca G. T., Rizcalla N., Krejci I., Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity prep- aration and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent 2015; 10: 392-413.

20. Ahlers M. O., Mörig G., Blunck U., Hajto J.; Pröbster L., Frankenberger R. Guide- lines for the preparation of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays and partial crowns. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 309-325.

21. Clausen J. O., Tara M. A., Kern M. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ce- ramic materials and preparation design. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 533-538.

22. Federlin M., Schmidt S., Hiller K. A., Thonemann B., Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 560-570.

23. Federlin M., Sipos C., Hiller K. A., Thonemann B., Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integ- rity – a scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Invest 2005; 9: 8-17.

24. Guess P. C., Shultheis S., Wolkewitz M., Zhang Y., Strub J. R. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110: 264-273.

25. Krifka S., Anthofer T., Fritsch M., Hiller K. A., Schmalz G. Federlin M. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thick- ness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 32-42.

26. Stappert C. F. J., Abe P., Kurths V., Gerds T., Strub J. R. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepance of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 41-48.

27. Stappert C. F. J., Att W., Gerds T., Strub J. R. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 514-522.

28. Arnetzl G. V., Arnetzl G. Design for all-ceramic inlay materials. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9: 289-298.

29. Arnetzl G. V., Arnetzl G. Biomechanical examination of inlay geometries – is there a basic biomechanical principle? Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 119-130.

30. Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010; 5: 50-76.

31. Kielbassa A. M., Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: Systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 751-764.

32. Magne P., Spreafico R. C. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent 2012; 2: 86-96.

33. Frankenberger R., Hehn J., Hajto J., Krämer N., Naumann M., Koch A., Roggendorf M. J. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 177-183.

34. Ilgenstein I., Zitzmann N. U., Bühler J., Wegehaupt F. J., Attin T., Weiger R., Krastl G. Influence of proximal box elevation and the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Invest 2015; 19: 1021-1028.

35. Roggendorf M. J., Krämer N., Dippold C., Vosen V. E., Naumann M., Jablonski- Momeni A., Frankenberger R. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent 2012; 40: 1068-1073.

36. Zaruba M., Kasper R., Kazama R., Wegehaupt F. J., Ender A., Attin T., Mehl A. Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 579-587.

37. Juloski J., Köken S., Ferrari M. Cervical margin relocation in indirect adhesive restorations. A literature review. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 273-280.

38. Felton D. A., Kanoy B. E., Bayne S. C., Wirthman G. P. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 357-364.

39. Kawai K., Isenberg B. P., Leinfelder K. F. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 53-58.

40. De Munck J., Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Suzuki K., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 136-140.

41. Giannini M., Soares C. J., de Carvalho R. M. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 322-329.

42. Ma Li, Guess P. C., Zhang Y. Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: Finite element and theoretical analyses. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 742-751.

43. Magne P., Schlichting L. H., Maia H. P., Baratieri L. N. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 149-157.

44. Magne P., Stanley K., Schlichting L. H. Modeling of ultrathin occlusal veneers. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 777-782.

45. Milichic G. The compression dome concept: the restorative implications. Gen Dent 2017; 65: 55-60.

46. Politano G., Fabianelli A., Papacchini F., Cerutti A. The use of bonded partial ceramic restorations to recover healthy compromised teeth. Int J Esthet Dent 2016; 11: 314-336.

47. Sasse M., Krummel A., Klosa K., Kern M. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 907-915.

48. Wendler M., Belli R., Valladares D., Petschelt A., Lohbauer U. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 3: Cyclic fatigue parameters and lifetime predictions. Dent Mater 2018; 34: 910-921.

49. Rosentritt M., Preis V., Behr M., Hahnel S., Handel G., Kolbeck C. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics. Clin Oral Inves- tig 2012; 16: 935-943.

50. Tian T., Tsoi J. K., Matinlinna J. P. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cement and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30: e147-162.

51. Elsayed A., Younes F., Lehmann F., Kern M. Tensile bond strength of so- called universal primers and universal multimode adhesives to zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 221-228.

52. Lyann S. K., Takagaki T., Nikaido T., U. o M., Ikeda M., Sadr A., Tagami J. Effect of different surface treatments on the tensile bond strength to lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 261-268.

53. Politano G., Fabianelli A., Papacchini F., Cerutti A. The use of bonded partial ceramic restorations to recover healthy compromised teeth. Int J Esthet Dent 2016; 11: 314-336.

54. Gregor L., Bouillaguet S., Onisor I., Ardu S., Krejci I., Rocca G. T. Microhard- ness of light-and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 942-948.

55. Gresnigt M. M. M., Cune M. S., de Roos J. G., Ozcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater 2016; 32: e73-81.

56. Molin M. K., Karlsson S. L., Kristiaensen M. S. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996;12: 245-249.

57. Silva N. R., de Souza G. M., Coelho P. G., Stappert C. F., Clark E. A., Rekow E. D., Thompson V. P. Effect of water storage time and composite cement thick- ness on fatigue of a glass-ceramic trilayer system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 117-123.

58. Cekic-Nagas I., Canay S., Sahin E. Bonding of resin core materials to lithium disilicate ceramics: the effect of resin cement film thickness. Int J Prostho- dont 2010; 23: 469-471.

59. Feilzer A. J., De Gee A. J., Davidson C. L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to the configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.

60. Feilzer A. J., De Gee A. J., Davidson C. L. Increased wall-to-wall curing contrac- tion in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1988; 68: 48-50.

61. D’Arcangelo C., Zarow M., De Angelis F., Vadini M., Paolantonio M., Giannoni M., D’Amario M. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 615-624.

62. Roggendorf M. J., Kunzi K., Eber J., Roggendorf H. C., Frankenberger R., Reich S. M. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC 2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations places within deeply destroyed teeth. Clin Oral Invest 2012; 16: 1413-1424.