medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8560 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)

2020, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Ortho-tips 2020; 16 (1)


Recomendaciones perioperatorias y transoperatorias para la prevención de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico en ortopedia

Ramos MA, Martínez LMJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 30
Paginas: 33-39
Archivo PDF: 120.87 Kb.


RESUMEN

Existen diferentes medidas para mejorar las condiciones de los pacientes programados electivamente o por urgencia para cirugía ortopédica o traumatológica. En esta revisión abordaremos las medidas perioperatorias y transoperatorias y su influencia en la prevención de la infección del sitio quirúrgico en Ortopedia. Trataremos de resumir evidencia de calidad de manera breve.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Muller O, Krawinkel M. Malnutrition and health in developing countries. CMAJ. 2005; 173 (3): 279-286.

  2. Mainous MR, Deitch EA. Nutrition and infection. Surg Clin North Am. 1994; 74 (3): 659-676.

  3. He Y, Xiao J, Shi Z, He J, Li T. Supplementation of enteral nutritional powder decreases surgical site infection, prosthetic joint infection, and readmission after hip arthroplasty in geriatric femoral neck fracture with hypoalbuminemia. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14 (1): 292.

  4. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berrios-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35 (6): 605-627.

  5. Pountos I, Giannoudis PV. Effect of methotrexate on bone and wound healing. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017; 16 (5): 535-545.

  6. Kurz A, Fleischmann E, Sessler DI, Buggy DJ, Apfel C, Akca O. Effects of supplemental oxygen and dexamethasone on surgical site infection: a factorial randomized trial doublé dagger. Br J Anaesth. 2015; 115 (3): 434-443.

  7. Stall A, Paryavi E, Gupta R, Zadnik M, Hui E, O’Toole RV. Perioperative supplemental oxygen to reduce surgical site infection after open fixation of high-risk fractures: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 75 (4): 657-663.

  8. Sessler DI. Mild perioperative hypothermia. New Engl J Med. 1997; 336 (24): 1730-1737.

  9. Diaz M, Becker DE. Thermoregulation: physiological and clinical considerations during sedation and general anesthesia. Anesthes Prog. 2010; 57 (1): 25-32; quiz 3-4.

  10. Ata A, Lee J, Bestle SL, Desemone J, Stain SC. Postoperative hyperglycemia and surgical site infection in general surgery patients. Arch Surg. 2010; 145 (9): 858-864.

  11. Kao LS, Phatak UR. Glycemic control and prevention of surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013; 14 (5): 437-444.

  12. Sehulster L, Chinn RY. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003; 52 (Rr-10): 1-42.

  13. Atkinson JYC, Pessoa-Silva CL, Jensen P, Li Y, Seto WH. Natural ventilation for infection control in health-care settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

  14. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88 (1): 65-71.

  15. Murphy L. Cost/benefit study of reusable and disposable OR draping materials. J Healthc Mat Manage. 1993; 11 (3): 44-48.

  16. Lizzi AM, Almada GC, Veiga G, Carbone N. Cost effectiveness of reusable surgical drapes versus disposable non-woven drapes in a Latin American hospital. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36 (5): e125.

  17. Overcash M. A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art 2012. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114 (5): 1055-1066

  18. Grosso MJ, Berg A, LaRussa S, Murtaugh T, Trofa DP, Geller JA. Silver-impregnated occlusive dressing reduces rates of acute periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32 (3): 929-932.

  19. Liu X, Zhang H, Cen S, Huang F. Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound dressings in treatment of open fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018; 53: 72-79.

  20. Hernandez NM, Hart A, Taunton MJ, Osmon DR, Mabry TM, Abdel MP, Perry KI. Use of povidone-iodine irrigation prior to wound closure in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 11,738 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101 (13): 1144-1150

  21. Frisch NB, Kadri OM, Tenbrunsel T, Abdul-Hak A, Qatu M, Davis JJ. Intraoperative chlorhexidine irrigation to prevent infection in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3 (4): 294-297.

  22. Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (3): CD003087.

  23. Ward WG Sr, Cooper JM, Lippert D, Kablawi RO, Neiberg RH, Sherertz RJ. Glove and gown effects on intraoperative bacterial contamination. Ann Surg. 2014; 259 (3): 591-597.

  24. Marco F, Vallez R, Gonzalez P, Ortega L, de la Lama J, Lopez-Duran L. Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopedic surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007; 8 (3): 359-365.

  25. Rothenburger S, Spangler D, Bhende S, Burkley D. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of coated VICRYL* Plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhibition assays. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002; 3 (Suppl. 1): S79-87.

  26. Storch ML, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G. Experimental efficacy study of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004; 5 (3): 281-288.

  27. McHugh SM, Hill AD, Humphreys H. Laminar airflow and the prevention of surgical site infection. More harm than good? Surgeon. 2015; 13 (1): 52-58.

  28. Erichsen Andersson A, Petzold M, Bergh I, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Nilsson K. Comparison between mixed and laminar airflow systems in operating rooms and the influence of human factors: experiences from a Swedish orthopedic center. Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42 (6): 665-669.

  29. Brandt C, Hott U, Sohr D, Daschner F, Gastmeier P, Rüden H. Operating room ventilation with laminar airflow shows no protective effect on the surgical site infection rate in orthopedic and abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2008; 248 (5): 695-700.

  30. Perez P, Holloway J, Ehrenfeld L, Cohen S, Cunningham L, Miley GB, et al. Door openings in the operating room are associated with increased environmental contamination. Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46 (8): 954-956.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com