medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8560 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)

2020, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Ortho-tips 2020; 16 (1)


Vigilancia epidemiológica de la infección del sitio quirúrgico en ortopedia

Franco-Cendejas R

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 7-15
Archivo PDF: 155.59 Kb.


RESUMEN

La infección del sitio quirúrgico representa un problema importante para los sistemas de salud de cualquier país. Es la principal complicación a nivel general de los pacientes sometidos a un procedimiento quirúrgico. La vigilancia de la presentación de dichos problemas es de suma importancia, esto con la finalidad de identificar y prevenir su presentación. Hay varios factores que se deben tomar en cuenta, uno de los principales es identificar correctamente dichas complicaciones mediante una definición estandarizada, con el objetivo de identificarlas y clasificarlas. Se deben tener sistemas de vigilancia adecuadamente estructurados para detectar correctamente el número y el tipo de infecciones. Asimismo, se debe mantener informado al personal de asistencia, directivo y usuario de los resultados de dicha vigilancia.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008; (5): 1-20.

  2. Meijs AP, Ferreira JA, DE Greeff SC, Vos MC, Koek MB. Incidence of surgical site infections cannot be derived reliably from point prevalence survey data in Dutch hospitals. Epidemiol Infect. 2017; 145 (5): 970-980.

  3. Astagneau P, Rioux C, Golliot F, Brücker G, Group INS. Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections: results from the 1997-1999 INCISO surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2001; 48 (4): 267-274.

  4. Freeman R. Evolution of healthcare-associated infection surveillance in England: Initiatives, implementation and opportunities for innovation. BMC Proceedings. 2011; 5 (Suppl 6): 1-1.

  5. King C, Aylin P, Chukwuemeka A, Anderson J, Holmes A. Assessing data sources for sustainable and continuous surveillance: surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass grafts in England. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 84 (4): 305-310.

  6. Tanner J, Padley W, Kiernan M, Leaper D, Norrie P, Baggott R. A benchmark too far: findings from a national survey of surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 83 (2): 87-91.

  7. Haley RW. The scientific basis for using surveillance and risk factor data to reduce nosocomial infection rates. J Hosp Infect. 1995; 30 Suppl: 3-14.

  8. Lee JT. Contemporary wound infection surveillance issues. New Horiz. 1998; 6 (2 Suppl): S20-9.

  9. Roy MC, Perl TM. Basics of surgical-site infection surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997; 18 (9): 659-668.

  10. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992; 13 (10): 606-608.

  11. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991; 91 (3B): 152S-157S.

  12. Cardo DM, Falk PS, Mayhall CG. Validation of surgical wound surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993; 14 (4): 211-215.

  13. Dicks KV, Lewis SS, Durkin MJ, Baker AW, Moehring RW, Chen LF, et al. Surveying the surveillance: surgical site infections excluded by the January 2013 updated surveillance definitions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35 (5): 570-573.

  14. O’Neill E, Humphreys H. Use of surveillance data for prevention of healthcare-associated infection: risk adjustment and reporting dilemmas. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009; 22 (4): 359-363.

  15. Rioux C, Grandbastien B, Astagneau P. The standardized incidence ratio as a reliable tool for surgical site infection surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27 (8): 817-824.

  16. Gaynes RP, Culver DH, Horan TC, Edwards JR, Richards C, Tolson JS. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992-1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33 Suppl 2: S69-77.

  17. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, Banerjee S, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell G, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009; 37 (10): 783-805.

  18. Paryavi E, Stall A, Gupta R, Scharfstein DO, Castillo RC, Zadnik M, et al. Predictive model for surgical site infection risk after surgery for high-energy lower-extremity fractures: development of the risk of infection in orthopedic trauma surgery score. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74 (6): 1521-1527.

  19. Torbert JT, Joshi M, Moraff A, Matuszewski PE, Holmes A, Pollak AN, et al. Current bacterial speciation and antibiotic resistance in deep infections after operative fixation of fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29 (1): 7-17.

  20. Perencevich EN, Sands KE, Cosgrove SE, Guadagnoli E, Meara E, Platt R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9 (2): 196-203.

  21. Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23 (4): 183-189.

  22. Partanen J, Syrjälä H, Vähänikkilä H, Jalovaara P. Impact of deep infection after hip fracture surgery on function and mortality. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 62 (1): 44-49.

  23. Van Walraven C, Musselman R. The Surgical Site Infection Risk Score (SSIRS): a model to predict the risk of surgical site infections. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (6): e67167.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com