medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System

2019, Número S1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Acta Med 2019; 17 (S1)


Diagnóstico genético preimplantación

Durán ML, Kably AA

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 39
Paginas: 48-53
Archivo PDF: 171.78 Kb.


RESUMEN

El diagnóstico genético preimplantacional (DGP) es un conjunto de acciones y procedimientos diagnósticos que permite conocer en un embrión la presencia o no de una determinada anomalía genética asociada con una enfermedad antes de su posible transferencia uterina. Esta evaluación tiene varias formas, como el tamizaje genético previo a la implantación (PGS), ahora denominado análisis genético preimplantacional para aneuploidías (PGT-A). El proceso involucra la derivación y el asesoramiento de las parejas, el tratamiento estándar de FIV, la obtención de ovocitos, cultivo de embriones, biopsia, diagnóstico genético y finalmente, la transferencia selectiva de embriones.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17 (4): 454-466.

  2. Simpson JL. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve pregnancy outcomes in subfertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 26 (6): 805-815.

  3. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990; 44 (6268): 768-770.

  4. Griffin D, Wilton L, Handyside A, Winston R, Delhanty J. Pregnancies following the diagnosis of sex in preimplantation embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. BMJ. 1993; 6 (6889): 1382.

  5. Munné S, Weier HU, Stein J, Grifo J, Cohen J. A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993; 10 (1): 82-90.

  6. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Schoolcraft W, Strom C, Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching. JAMA. 2001; 285 (24): 3130-3133.

  7. Lavery S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: new reproductive options for carriers of haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2004; 10 (Suppl 4): 126-132.

  8. Handyside, AH, Lesko, JG, Tarin, JJ, Winston, RM, Hughes, MR. Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327 (13): 905-909.

  9. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27 (4): 1214-1218.

  10. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet. 2000; 106 (2): 210-217.

  11. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013; 132 (9): 1001-1013.

  12. Verlinsky Y, Ginsberg N, Lifchez A, Valle J, Moise J, Strom CM. Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 1990; 5 (7): 826-829.

  13. Magli MC, Montag M, Koster M, Muzi L, Geraedts J, Collins J et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte.: Part II: technical aspects. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26 (11): 3181-3185.

  14. Munné S, Wells D. Detection of mosaicism at blastocyst stage with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107 (5): 1085-1091.

  15. Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Ingerslev HJ. Human embryonic development after blastomere removal: a time-lapse analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27 (1): 97-105.

  16. Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Scarica C, Palagiano A, Canipari R, Rienzi L. The impact of biopsy on human embryo developmental potential during preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 7193075.

  17. McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84 (6): 1628-1636.

  18. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro RA, Alvarez SC, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (6): CD002118.

  19. Wells D. Next-generation sequencing: the dawn of a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnostics. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101 (5): 1250-1251.

  20. Munné S. Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 37 (4): 393-396.

  21. Treff NR, Scott Jr RT. Four-hour quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based comprehensive chromosome screening and accumulating evidence of accuracy, safety, predictive value, and clinical efficacy. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99 (4): 1049-1053.

  22. Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 (3): 697-703.

  23. Treff NR, Tao X, Ferry KM, Su J, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97 (4): 819-824.

  24. Brezina PR, Kearns WG. The evolving role of genetics in reproductive medicine. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014; 41 (1): 41-55.

  25. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D et al. High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998; 20 (2): 207-211.

  26. Ramos L, del Rey J, Daina G, García-Aragonés M, Armengol L, Fernandez-Encinas A et al. Oligonucleotide arrays vs. metaphase-comparative genomic hybridisation and BAC arrays for single-cell analysis: first applications to preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation carriers. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (11): e113223.

  27. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26 (7): 1925-1935.

  28. Capalbo A, Wright G, Elliott T, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Nagy ZP. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28 (8): 2298-2307.

  29. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, Colamaria S et al. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28 (2): 509-518.

  30. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Dowell K, Ndukwe G, Kelada E et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fertil Steril. 2010; 93 (3): 1006 e7-1006 e10.

  31. Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, Su J, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95 (5): 1606-12 e1-2.

  32. Treff NR, Tao X, Schillings WJ, Bergh PA, Scott RT Jr, Levy B. Use of single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays to distinguish between balanced and normal chromosomes in embryos from a translocation carrier. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96 (1): e58-65.

  33. Li G, Jin H, Xin Z, Su Y, Brezina PR, Benner AT et al. Increased IVF pregnancy rates after microarray preimplantation genetic diagnosis due to parental translocations. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014; 60 (2): 119-124.

  34. Thornhill AR, Handyside AH, Ottolini C, Natesan SA, Taylor J, Sage K et al. Karyomapping-a comprehensive means of simultaneous monogenic and cytogenetic PGD: comparison with standard approaches in real time for Marfan syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32 (3): 347-356.

  35. Friedenthal J, Maxwell SM, Munné S, Kramer Y, McCulloh DH, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109 (4): 627-632.

  36. Munné S, Blazek J, Large M, Martinez-Ortiz PA, Nisson H, Liu E et al. Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108 (1): 62-71.

  37. Maxwell SM, Colls P, Hodes-Wertz B, McCulloh DH, McCaffrey C, Wells D et al. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106 (6): 1414-1419.e5.

  38. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Babariy, D, Wells D, Tarozzi N et al. Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts. Human Genetics. 2017; 136 (7): 805-819.

  39. Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373 (21): 2089-2090.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com