medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Digital)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Impreso)

2019, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Cir Gen 2019; 41 (1)


Apendicitis aguda: revisión de la literatura

Hernández-Cortez J, De León-Rendón JL, Martínez-Luna MS, Guzmán-Ortiz JD, Palomeque-López A, Cruz-López N, José-Ramírez H

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 48
Paginas: 33-38
Archivo PDF: 183.90 Kb.


RESUMEN

La apendicitis aguda es la patología quirúrgica abdominal más común en el mundo y representa la principal causa de cirugía abdominal de urgencia; se informa que su mayor frecuencia es en la población de entre 20 y 30 años y no presenta predominio de género. Su presentación clínica es variable en algunas ocasiones, por lo que se deben utilizar estudios imagenológicos para su diagnóstico certero. El tratamiento de la apendicitis aguda es mediante cirugía con abordaje laparoscópico o abierto. El propósito de nuestra revisión es exponer la información actualizada sobre este tema tan común.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Williams GR. Presidential address: a history of appendicitis. With anecdotes illustrating its importance. Ann Surg. 1983; 197: 495-506.

  2. Cilindro de Souza S, Matos Rodrigues da Costa SR, Silva de Souza IG. Vermiform appendix: positions and length–a study of 377 cases and literature review. J Coloproctol (Rio J). 2015; 35: 212-216.

  3. Barlow A, Muhleman M, Gielecki J, Matusz P, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. The vermiform appendix: a review. Clin Anat. 2013; 26: 833-842.

  4. Ghorbani A, Forouzesh M, Kazemifar AM. Variation in anatomical position of vermiform appendix among Iranian population: an old issue which has not lost its importance. Anat Res Int. 2014; 2014: 313575.

  5. Mohammadi S, Hedjazi A, Sajjadian M, Rahmani M, Mohammadi M, Moghadam MD. Morphological variations of the vermiform appendix in Iranian cadavers: a study from developing countries. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2017 Mar 29. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2017.0032. [Epub ahead of print]

  6. Sotelo-Anaya E, Sánchez-Muñoz MP, Ploneda-Valencia CF, de la Cerda-Trujillo LF, Varela-Muñoz O, Gutiérrez-Chávez C, et al. Acute appendicitis in an overweight and obese Mexican population: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016; 32: 6-9.

  7. Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol. 2010; 20: 97-105.

  8. Lin KB, Chan CL, Yang NP, Lai RK, Liu YH, Zhu SZ, et al. Epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy for the low-income population in Taiwan, 2003-2011. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 15: 18.

  9. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000; 215: 337-348.

  10. Lau WY, Teoh-Chan CH, Fan ST, Yam WC, Lau KF, Wong SH. The bacteriology and septic complication of patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg. 1984; 200: 576-581.

  11. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015; 386: 1278-1287.

  12. Jeon HG, Ju HU, Kim GY, Jeong J, Kim MH, Jun JB. Bacteriology and changes in antibiotic susceptibility in adults with community-acquired perforated appendicitis. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e111144.

  13. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ. The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg. 1995; 221: 278-281.

  14. Chandrasekaran TV, Johnson N. Acute appendicitis. Surgery (Oxford). 2014; 32: 413-417.

  15. Humes DJ, Simpson J. Clinical presentation of acute appendicitis: clinical signs laboratory findings clinical scores, Alvarado score and derivate scores. En: Keyzer C, Gevenois PA (Eds.). Imaging of acute appendicitis in adults and children. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.

  16. Takada T, Nishiwaki H, Yamamoto Y, Noguchi Y, Fukuma S, Yamazaki S, et al. The role of digital rectal examination for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0136996.

  17. Werner JC, Zock M, Khalil PN, Hoffmann J, Kanz KG, Jauch KW. Evidence for the digital rectal examination in the emergency assessment of acute abdominal pain. Zentralbl Chir. 2013; 138: 669-676.

  18. Petroianu A. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2012; 10: 115-119.

  19. Prosenz J, Hirtler L. Rovsing sign revisited—effects of an erroneous translation on medical teaching and research. J Surg Educ. 2014; 71: 738-742.

  20. Dayawansa NH, Segan JDS, Yao HHI, Chong HI, Sitzler PJ. Incidence of normal white cell count and C-reactive protein in adults with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2018; 88: E539-E543.

  21. Brunicardi F. Schwartz: Principios de cirugía. Capítulo 30: El Apéndice.10.a edición. McGraw-Hill; 2015. pp. 1241-1259.

  22. Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 322-329.

  23. Sand M, Bechara FG, Holland-Letz T, Sand D, Mehnert G, Mann B. Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 2009; 198: 193-198.

  24. Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL. Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology. 2005; 235: 89-96.

  25. Viradia NK, Gaing B, Kang SK, Rosenkrantz AB. Acute appendicitis: use of clinical and CT findings for modeling hospital resource utilization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: W275-W282.

  26. Whitley S, Sookur P, McLean A, Power N. The appendix on CT. Clin Radiol. 2009; 64: 190-199.

  27. Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, Kook SH, Kim SK, Kwag HJ, et al. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol. 2003; 44: 574-582.

  28. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, Lesnik A, Blayac PM, Pujol J, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology. 2004; 230: 472-478.

  29. Hussain S, Rahman A, Abbasi T, Aziz T. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014; 26: 12-17.

  30. Thorpe JA. The plain abdominal radiograph in acute appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979; 61: 45-47.

  31. Ekere C, Lillie A, Mehta C, Clarke A. A plain abdominal radiograph diagnosis of appendicitis. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013; 4: 1091-1092.

  32. Dewhurst C, Beddy P, Pedrosa I. MRI evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 37: 566-575.

  33. Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other non obstetric causes. Radiographics. 2012; 32: 317-334.

  34. Oto A, Ernst RD, Ghulmiyyah LM, Nishino TK, Hughes D, Chaljub G, et al. MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging. 2009; 34: 243-250.

  35. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 28-37.

  36. Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, Lee JH, Park JK, Moon HJ. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2013; 79: 101-106.

  37. Meltzer AC, Baumann BM, Chen EH, Shofer FS, Mills AM. Poor sensitivity of a modified Alvarado score in adults with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62: 126-131.

  38. Ozkan S, Duman A, Durukan P, Yildirim A, Ozbakan O. The accuracy rate of Alvarado score, ultrasonography, and computerized tomography scan in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our center. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014; 17: 413-418.

  39. Mán E, Simonka Z, Varga A, Rárosi F, Lázár G. Impact of the Alvarado score on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparing clinical judgment, Alvarado score, and a new modified score in suspected appendicitis: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 2398-2405.

  40. Ohle R, O’Reilly F, O’Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011; 9: 139.

  41. Tan WJ, Acharyya S, Goh YC, Chan WH, Wong WK, Ooi LL, et al. Prospective comparison of the Alvarado score and CT scan in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis: a proposed algorithm to guide CT use. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220: 218-224.

  42. Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, Catena F, Weber DG, Sartelli M, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016; 11: 34.

  43. Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía General, AC. Guía de Práctica Clínica. Apendicitis aguda. México: 2014. p. 6.

  44. Podda M, Cillara N, Di Saverio S, Lai A, Feroci F, Luridiana G, et al. Antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults is associated with increased rates of peritonitis at surgery. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing appendectomy and non-operative management with antibiotics. Surgeon. 2017; 15: 303-314.

  45. Harnoss JC, Zelienka I, Probst P, Grummich K, Müller-Lantzsch C, Harnoss JM, et al. Antibiotics versus surgical therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials (PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015016882). Ann Surg. 2017; 265: 889-900.

  46. Sakran JV, Mylonas KS, Gryparis A, Stawicki SP, Burns CJ, Matar MM, et al. Operation versus antibiotics—The “appendicitis conundrum” continues: A meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82: 1129-1137.

  47. Dai L, Shuai J. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5: 542-553.

  48. Yu MC, Feng YJ, Wang W, Fan W, Cheng HT, Xu J. Is laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017; 40: 187-197.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com