Gutiérrez LA, Prohias MJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 18
Paginas:
Archivo PDF: 354.16 Kb.

RESUMEN

La ecocardiografía es una herramienta imprescindible para la cardiología contemporánea. Su aprendizaje constituye un reto para los residentes de cardiología. Se exponen algunas consideraciones de un cardiólogo en formación y las de un experto en imagen cardíaca sobre este proceso de formación en ecocardiografía.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Fuster V, Halperin JL, Williams ES, et al. COCATS 4 task force 1: training in ambulatory, consultative, and longitudinal cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1734–53.

2. Ryan T, Berlacher K, Lindner JR, Mankad SV, Rose GA, Wang A. COCATS 4 task force 5: trainingin echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1786–99.

3. Technology Price Index. Modern Healthcare/ECRI Institute 2016. Available at: http://www.modernhealthcare.com/section/technology-priceindex. Accessed December 2017.

4. Badano LP, Nucifora G, Stacul S, et al. Improved workflow, sonographer productivity, and costeffectiveness of echocardiographic service for inpatients by using miniaturized systems. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:537–42.

5. Macdonald K, Scott P. Scanning through the pain: ergonomic considerations for performing echocardiography of animals. J Vet Cardiol 2013;15:57–63.

6. Sengupta PP, Chandrasekaran K, Prince DJ, Dyke RA, Khandheria BK. Role of biplane echocardiography in a large-volume clinical practice: revamping strategies for echocardiography in a limited time. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:757–60.

7. Johnson TV, Symanski JD, Patel SR, Rose GA. Improvement in the assessment of diastolic function in a clinical echocardiography laboratory following implementation of a quality improvement initiative. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:1169–79.

8. Frommelt P, Gorentz J, Deatsman S, Organ D, Frommelt M, Mussatto K. Digital imaging, archiving, and structured reporting in pediatric echocardiography: impact on laboratory efficiency and physician communication. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:935–40.

9. Chandra S, Arling B, Rock J, Spencer KT. Detection of discrepancies in facilitated echocardiographic reporting using a prototype rule generator. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:778–82.

10. Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Ferencik M, et al. Interpreting the interpretations: the use of structured reporting improves referring clinicians comprehension of coronary CT angiography reports. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10: 432–8.

11. Senni M, Rodeheffer RJ, Tribouilloy CM, et al. Use of echocardiography in the management of congestive heart failure in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:164–70.

12. Lim TK, Dwivedi G, Hayat S, Collinson PO, Senior R. Cost effectiveness of the B type natriuretic peptide, electrocardiography, and portable echocardiography for the assessment. JACC. Vol 7 2, No 4, 2018 Wan July 24, 2018:467–70

13. Papolos A, Narula J, Bavishi C, Chaudhry FA, Sengupta PP. U.S. hospital use of echocardiography: insights from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:502–11.

14. Gibney F, Luscombe B. The Rebirth of Design. Time March 20, 2000.

15. Kabbash P, MacKenzie IS, Buxton W. Human performance using computer input devices in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM 1993: 474–81.

16. Thaden JJ, Nkomo VT, Lee KJ, Oh JK. Doppler imaging in aortic stenosis: the importance of the nonapical imaging windows to determine severity in a contemporary cohort. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:780–5.

17. Jones C, Ramanau R, Cross S, Healing G. Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education 2010;54:722–32.

18. Monaco M, Martin M. The millennial student: a new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal 2007;2:42–6.