Mata SN, Jiménez MC, Sánchez MKP

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 59
Paginas: 326-333
Archivo PDF: 242.83 Kb.

RESUMEN

La exposición de dentina radicular asociada a una recesión gingival puede producir dolor ante distintos estímulos, situación que puede dificultar la vida cotidiana de los pacientes que lo padecen, además de presentar complicaciones estéticas que pueden afectar la autoestima. La hipersensibilidad dentinaria tiene una etiología asociada a múltiples factores, siendo el principal factor de riesgo la recesión gingival, situación clínica común que se observa en gran parte de la población. El propósito de esta revisión es reunir distintos conceptos que expliquen la asociación que mantienen estas dos patologías, sus etiologías, el cuadro clínico que presenta la hipersensibilidad dentinaria para poder realizar un diagnóstico diferencial y las distintas opciones de tratamiento para realizar un adecuado manejo de esta condición que incluyen desde recursos terapéuticos que buscan resolver la sintomatología hasta procedimientos quirúrgicos que resultan más invasivos y que se enfocan en tratar el factor predisponente como es la recesión gingival misma.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Prato GP, Clauser C, Tonetti MS, Cortellini P. Guided tissue regeneration in gingival recessions. Periodontol 2000. 1996; 11 (1): 49-57.

2. Pashley DH. Dentin hypersensitivity: consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis & management of dentin hypersensitivity. Inside Dent. 2008; 4 (9): 1-37.

3. Strassler HE, Drisko CL, Alexander DC. Dentin hypersensitivity: its inter-relationship to gingival recession and acid erosion. Dentistry India. 2008; 5 (29).

4. Cummins D. Dentin hypersensitivity: from diagnosis to a breakthrough therapy for everyday sensitivity relief. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20 (1): 1-9.

5. Von Troil B, Needleman I, Sanz M. A systematic review of the prevalence of root sensitivity following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29 (3): 173-177.

6. Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006; 51 (3): 212-218.

7. Lussi A, Schaffner M. Progression of and risk factors for dental erosion and wedge–shaped defects over a 6-year period. Caries Res. 2000; 34 (2): 182-187.

8. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG. Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24 (1): 15-19.

9. Brännström M. A hydrodynamic mechanism in the transmission of pain producing stimuli through the dentine. Sens Mech Dentine. 1963; 1: 73-79.

10. Tammaro S, Wennström JL, Bergenholtz G. Root-dentin sensitivity following non-surgical periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27 (9): 690-697.

11. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: Definition, prevalence, distribution and etiology. In: Addy M, Embery G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, editors. Tooth wear and sensitivity: Clinical advances in restorative dentistry. London: Martin Dunitz; 2000. pp. 239-248.

12. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J. 2002; 52: 367-375.

13. West NX. Dentine hypersensitivity: preventive and therapeutic approaches to treatment. Periodontol 2000. 2008; 48 (1): 31-41.

14. Smith BG, Robb ND. The prevalence of toothwear in 1007 dental patients. J Oral Rehabil. 1996; 23 (4): 232-239.

15. Bernick S. Innervation of the human tooth. Anat Rec. 1948; 101 (1): 81-107.

16. Frank RM. Attachment sites between the odontoblast process and the intradentinal nerve fibre. Arch Oral Biol. 1968; 13 (7): 833-839.

17. Krauser JT. Hypersensitive teeth. Part I: etiology. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56 (2): 153-156.

18. Kukletova M, Zahradka J, Lukáš Z. Monoaminergic and cholinergic nerve fibres in the human dental pulp. Histochem Cell Biol. 1968; 16 (2): 154-158.

19. Cohen S, Hargreaves KMK, Karl KMH. Vías de la pulpa. Madrid: Elsevier Science; 2008.

20. Berman LH. Dentinal sensation and hypersensitivity: a review of mechanisms and treatment alternatives. J Periodontol. 1985; 56 (4): 216-222.

21. Cuniberti N, Rossi G. Lesiones cervicales no cariosas: La lesión dental del futuro. Editor. Médica Panam. 2009, p. 121.

22. Navarro H, Rivera S. Hipersensibilidad dentinaria : enfoques acerca de su diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev Dent Chile. 2002; 93 (2): 20-24.

23. Sigurdsson A. Pulpal diagnosis. Endod Top. 2003; 5 (1): 12-25.

24. Leffingwell CS, Meinberg TA, Wagner JG, Gound TG, Marx DB, Reinhardt RA. Pulp responses to precise thermal stimuli in dentin-sensitive teeth. JOE. 2004; 30 (6): 384-387.

25. Kleinberg I. Dentinal hypersensitivity, Part II: Treatment of sensitive dentin. Compend. Contin Educ Dent. 1986; 17 (4): 280-282.

26. Bender IB. Pulpal pain diagnosis-A review. JOE. 2000; 26 (3): 175-179.

27. AA of Periodontology, Glossary of periodontal terms. American Academy of Periodontology, 2001.

28. Dominiak M, Gedrange T. New perspectives in the diagnostic of gingival recession. Adv Clin Exp Med Off Organ Wroclaw Med Univ. 2013; 23 (6): 857-863.

29. Romanelli HJ, Pérez EJA. Fundamentos de cirugía periodontal. Actualidades Médico Odontológicas Latinoamérica. 2004.

30. Addy M. Tooth brushing, tooth wear and dentine hypersensitivity-are they associated? Int Dent J. 2005; 55 (4): 261-267.

31. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75 (5): 487-494.

32. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137 (7): 990-998.

33. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J. 1999; 49 (3): 139-143.

34. Santarelli GAE, Ciancaglini R, Campanari F, Dinoi D, Ferraris S. Connective tissue grafting employing the tunnel technique: a case report of complete root coverage in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21 (1): 77-83.

35. Miller Jr PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 5 (2): 8.

36. Knight NN, Lie T, Clark SM, Adams DF. Hypersensitive dentin: testing of procedures for mechanical and chemical obliteration of dentinal tubuli. J Periodontol. 1993; 64 (5): 366-373.

37. Greenhill JD, Pashley DH. The effects of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res. 1981; 60 (3): 686-698.

38. Haywood VB, Caughman WF, Frazier KB, Myers ML. Tray delivery of potassium nitrate--fluoride to reduce bleaching sensitivity. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32 (2): 105-109.

39. Majji P, Murthy KRV. Clinical efficacy of four interventions in the reduction of dentinal hypersensitivity: a 2-month study. Indian J Dent Res. 2016; 27 (5): 477.

40. Ong G. Desensitizing agents. A review. Clin Prev Dent. 1986; 8 (3): 14.

41. Jackson RJ, Duke SA, Wicks MA, McDonald FE. The effects of antisensitivity dentifrices on subjects consuming acid diets. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 368.

42. Hodosh M. A superior desensitizer-Potassium nitrate. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974; 88 (4): 831-832.

43. Tarbet WJ, Silverman G, Stolman JM, Fratarcangelo PA. Clinical evaluation of a new treatment for dentinal hypersensitivity. J Periodontol. 1980; 51 (9): 535-540.

44. Lavender SA, Petrou I, Heu R, Stranick MA, Cummins D, Kilpatrick-Liverman L, Sullivan RJ, Santarpia RP. Mode of action studies on a new desensitizing dentifrice containing 8.0% arginine, a high cleaning calcium carbonate system and 1450 ppm fluoride. Am J Dent. 2010; 23: 14-19.

45. Márquez M, Quintero A, Sanz A, Ramírez V, Inostroza C, Chaparro A. Efecto de la arginina 8%-carbonato de calcio y del fluoruro de sodio al 5% en la reducción de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria post terapia periodontal: ensayo clínico. Rev Clínica Periodoncia Implantol y Rehabil Oral. 2011; 4 (1): 22-25.

46. Docimo R, Montesani L, Maturo P, Costacurta M, Bartolino M, DeVizio W et al. Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a commercial sensitive toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: An eight-week clinical study in Rome, Italy. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20 (1): 17.

47. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24 (11): 808-813.

48. Kielbassa AM. Dentine hypersensitivity: Simple steps for everyday diagnosis and management. Int Dent J. 2002; 52 (S5P2): 394-396.

49. Parkinson CR, Willson RJ. A comparative in vitro study investigating the occlusion and mineralization properties of commercial toothpastes in a four-day dentin disc model. J Clin Dent. 2010; 22 (3): 74-81.

50. Lena K, Marianne K. Ozone treatment on dentin hypersensitivity surfaces- A pilot study. 2017; 11: 65-70.

51. Medina A. Recesión gingival: una revisión de su etiología, patogénesis y tratamiento. Av. en Periodoncia e Implantol. 2009; 21 (1): 35-43.

52. Fathima KH, Harish VS. A comparison of efficiency of biopolymer and allograft matrix with autogenous gingival graft used in root coverage procedure. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7: 695.

53. García-Delaney C, Abad-Sánchez D, Arnabat-Domínguez J, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the photobiomodulation in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity after basic therapy. A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9 (5): e694-e702.

54. Pandey R, Koppolu P, Kalakonda B, Lakshmi BV, Mishra A, Reddy PK, Bollepalli AC. Treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity using low-level laser therapy and 5% potassium nitrate: A randomized, controlled, three arm parallel clinical study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017; 7 (1): 63.

55. De Matos M. Evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity treatment with glass ionomer cements : A randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31: e3.

56. Nardi GM, Sabatini S, Lauritano D, Silvestre F, Petruzzi M. Effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes in reducing tooth sensitivity: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016; 9 (4): 185-189.

57. Jenabian N, Bahabadi MY, Bijani A, Rad MR. Gingival unit graft versus free gingival graft for treatment of gingival recession: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran). 2016; 13 (3): 184-192.

58. Jenabian N, Khanjani N, Bijani A, Science M. The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial. Electronic Physician. 2017; 9 (2): 3699-3705.

59. Mukherji A. Calcium sulfate combined with guided tissue regeneration : A novel technique in treatment of gingival recessions. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2016; 7 (2): 258-261.