medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2018, Número 5

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

salud publica mex 2018; 60 (5)


Validación de una versión reducida en español del instrumento Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairments

Úbeda-Colomer J, Peiró-Velert C, Devís-Devís J

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 36
Paginas: 539-548
Archivo PDF: 267.75 Kb.


RESUMEN

Objetivo. Validar una versión reducida en español del instrumento Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairments (BPAQ-MI), aplicable a diferentes tipos de discapacidad. Material y métodos. El cuestionario fue aplicado a 791 universitarios con discapacidad. La estructura factorial se validó mediante un análisis factorial confirmatorio y, para valorar la validez criterial, se llevaron a cabo correlaciones de Spearman. La fiabilidad se evaluó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. El modelo propuesto reveló buenos índices de ajuste y una excelente consistencia interna (α=0.920). Surgieron relaciones negativas entre las barreras experimentadas y el tiempo de actividad física. Conclusiones. La versión reducida y en español del BPAQ-MI resulta un instrumento válido y fiable para identificar, desde un enfoque socioecológico, las barreras que los estudiantes con discapacidad experimentan para realizar actividad física. Los resultados aportan información valiosa para desarrollar programas de promoción de la actividad física en este colectivo.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Recomendaciones mundiales sobre actividad física para la salud [internet]. Ginebra: OMS, 2010 [citado ene 25, 2015]. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre am/10665/44441/1/9789243599977_spa.pdf

  2. Carroll DD, Courtney-Long EA, Stevens AC, Sloan ML, Lullo C, Visser SN, et al. Vital signs: disability and physical activity - United States, 2009- 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(18):407-13.

  3. Anderson LS, Heyne LA. Physical activity for children and adults with disabilities: an issue of amplified importance. Disabil Health J. 2010;3(2):71-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.11.004

  4. Rimmer JH, Riley B, Wang E, Rauworth A, Jurkowski J. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(5):419-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.002

  5. Bragaru M, Van Wilgen CP, Geertzen JHB, Ruijs SJGB, Dijkstra PU, Dekker R. Barriers and facilitators of participation in sports: a qualitative study on Dutch individuals with lower limb amputation. PLos One. 2013;8(3):e59881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059881

  6. Vasudevan V, Rimmer JH, Kviz F. Development of the Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairments. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(4):547-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.04.007

  7. Lawson HA. Toward a socioecological conception of health. Quest. 1992;44(1):105-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1992.10484044

  8. Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47(1):6-22. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6

  9. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988;15(4):351-77. https:// doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401

  10. Devís-Devís J, Beltrán-Carrillo V, Peiró-Velert C. Exploring socioecological factors influencing active and inactive Spanish students in years 12 and 13. Sport Educ Soc. 2015;20(3):361-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 573322.2012.754753

  11. Sallis J, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297-322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth. 27.021405.102100

  12. Martin-Ginis KA, Ma JK, Latimer-Cheung AE, Rimmer JH. A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(4):478-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016. 1198240

  13. Úbeda-Colomer J, Molina P, Campos J. Facilitadores y barreras para la actividad física en tiempo de ocio en alumnado universitario con discapacidad: un estudio cualitativo. Educ Fis Deport. 2016;35(1). http://doi. org/10.17533/udea.efyd.v35n1a03

  14. Buffart LM, Westendorp T, Van den Berg-Emons RJ, Stam HJ, Roebroeck ME. Perceived barriers to and facilitators of physical activity in young adults with childhood-onset physical disabilities. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(11):881-85. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0420

  15. Richardson EV, Smith B, Papathomas A. Disability and the gym: experiences, barriers and facilitators of gym use for individuals with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(19):1950-1957. https://doi.org/10.1080 /09638288.2016.1213893

  16. Seron BB, De Arruda GA, Greguol M. Facilitadores e barreiras percebidas para a prática de atividade física por pessoas com deficiência motora. Rev Bras Ciênc Esporte. 2015;37(3):214-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rbce.2013.09.003

  17. Matheri JM, Frantz JM. Physical activity levels among young people with physical disabilities in selected high schools in Kenya and their perceived barriers and facilitators to participation. J Commun Health Sci. 2009;4(1):21-6.

  18. Rimmer JH, Rubin SS, Braddock D. Barriers to exercise in African American women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(2):182-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90138-2

  19. Scelza WM, Kalpakjian CZ, Zemper ED, Tate DG. Perceived barriers to exercise in people with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(8):576-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. phm.0000171172.96290.67

  20. Becker H, Stuifbergen A, Sands D. Development of a scale to measure barriers to health promotion activities among persons with disabilities. Am J Health Behav. 1991;5:449-54. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-5.6.449

  21. Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, Morgan K. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(6):434-57. https://doi. org/10.1080/09638280701625377

  22. Kang M, Zhu W, Ragan BG, Frogley M. Exercise barrier severity and perseverance of active youth with physical disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(2):170-6. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.52.2.170

  23. Sechrist K, Walker S, Pender N. Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefits/barriers scale. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10:357-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770100603

  24. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2013, del 29 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba el Texto Refundido de la Ley General de Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad y de su Inclusión Social. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Iguialdad, 2013.

  25. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-95. https://doi. org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

  26. Duncan MJ, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Subramanieapillai M, Remington G, Faulkner G. Revisiting the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): Assessing physical activity among individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2017;179:2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.010

  27. Ramada-Rodilla JM, Serra-Pujadas C, Delclós-Clanchet GI. Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(1):57-66. https://doi. org/10.1590/S0036-36342013000100009

  28. Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non-normal and categorical data in SEM. En: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, (eds.). Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course. Greenwich, CO: Information Age Publishing, 2006: 269-314.

  29. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

  30. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Nueva York: Guilford, 1998.

  31. Mulligan HF, Hale LA, Whitehead L, Baxter GD. Barriers to physical activity for people with long-term neurological conditions: a review study. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2012;29:243-265. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.29.3.243

  32. Stapleton JN, Martin-Ginis KA. The SHAPE-SCI Research Group. Sex differences in theory-based predictors of leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of adults with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1787-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.021

  33. Shields N, Synnot AJ, Barr M. Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(14):989-97. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090236

  34. Martin JJ. Benefits and barriers to physical activity for individuals with disabilities: a social-relational model of disability perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(24):2030-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.802377

  35. Kars C, Hofman M, Geertzen JH, Pepping GJ, Dekker R. Participation in sports by lower limb amputees in the Province of Drenthe, the Netherlands. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33:356-67. https://doi. org/10.3109/03093640902984579

  36. Rimmer JH, Wang E, Smith D. Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):315-22. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.02.0042




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com