medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Impreso)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2018, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2018; 20 (2)


Eficacia del retratamiento de cementos endodónticos biocerámicos: Revisión de Literatura

Kakoura F, Pantelidou O

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 68
Paginas: 39-50
Archivo PDF: 163.01 Kb.


RESUMEN

El retratamiento endodóntico es una solución factible cuando la periodontitis apical post-operatoria persiste o se desarrolla. La eliminación completa de los materiales obturadores es importante para garantizar el contacto y acción de los desinfectantes e irrigantes endodónticos con los microorganismos persistentes. A medida que ha surgido una nueva generación de selladores endodónticos biocerámicos, su eficacia de eliminación del sistema de conductos radiculares durante el retratamiento es motivo de preocupación entre los profesionales. El objetivo de este artículo es proporcionar una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura actual sobre la influencia o posibles limitantes del uso de este tipo de cementos bioactivos durante el retratamiento endodóntico. Los estudios determinaron una cantidad significativa de restos de selladores biocerámicos en las paredes del conducto radicular. Aunque la limpieza del canal no se pudo obtener a un nivel “ideal”, el restablecimiento de la longitud de trabajo y la permeabilidad se puede considerar manejable y comparable a otros selladores endodónticos.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Kojima K., Inamoto K., Nagamatsu K., Hara A., Nakata K., Morita I., et al. Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97 (1): 95-9.

  2. Ng Y-L., Mann V., Rahbaran S., Lewsey J., Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: Systematic review of the literature- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008; 41 (1): 6-31.

  3. Haapasalo M., Shen Y., Qian W., Gao Y. Irrigation in Endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54 (2): 291-312.

  4. Nair PNR. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: A review. Int Endod J. 2006; 39 (4): 249-81.

  5. Trope M. The vital tooth - its importance in the study and practice of endodontics. Endod Top. 2003; 5 (1): 1-1.

  6. Ng Y-L., Mann V., Gulabivala K. Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2008; 41 (12): 1026-46.

  7. Zehnder M., Paque F. Disinfection of the root canal system during root canal. Endod Top. 2011; (9): 58-73.

  8. Nair P. N. R. Pathogenesis of Apical Periodontitis and the Causes of Endodontic Failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004; 15 (6): 348-81.

  9. Schirrmeister J. F., Wrbas K. T., Meyer K. M., Altenburger M. J., Hellwig E. Efficacy of Different Rotary Instruments for Gutta- Percha Removal in Root Canal Retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32 (5): 469-72.

  10. Grischke J., Muller-Heine A., Hulsmann M. The effect of four different irrigation systems in the removal of a root canal sealer. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 1-7.

  11. Ring J., Murray P. E., Namerow K. N., Moldauer B. I., Garcia-Godoy F. Removing Root Canal Obturation Materials A Comparison of Rotary File Systems and Retreatment Agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140 (6): 680-8.

  12. Hülsmann M., Bluhm V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2004; 37 (7): 468-76.

  13. Rached-Junior F. J. A., Sousa-Neto M. D., Souza-Gabriel A. E., Duarte M. A. H., Silva- Sousa Y. T. C. Impact of remaining zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer on the bond strength of a resinous sealer to dentine after root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2014; 47 (5): 463-9.

  14. Wilcox L. R., Krell K. V., Madison S., Rittman B. Endodontic retreatment: Evaluation of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation. J Endod. 1987; 13 (9): 453-7.

  15. Ruddle C. Nonsurgical Retreatment. J Endod. 2004; 30 (12): 827-45.

  16. Taşdemir T., Er K., Yildirim T., Çelik D. Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals. Int Endod J. 2008; 41 (3):191-6.

  17. Duncan H. F., Chong B. S. Removal of root filling materials. Endod Top. 2008; 19 (1): 33-57.

  18. Rödig T., Reicherts P., Konietschke F., Dullin C., Hahn W., Hülsmann M. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments for retreatment of curved root canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J. 2014; 47 (10): 942-8.

  19. De Siqueira Zuolo A., Zuolo M. L., Da Silveira Bueno C. E., Chu R., Cunha R. S. Evaluation of the Efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc File Systems in the Removal of Root Filling Material: An Ex Vivo Micro- Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2016; 42 (2): 315-9.

  20. Rödig T., Kupis J., Konietschke F., Dullin C., Drebenstedt S., Hülsmann M. Comparison of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing gutta-percha from previously treated curved root canals: A microcomputed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2014; 47 (2): 173-82.

  21. Prakash R., Gopikrishna V., Kandaswamy D., Student P., and P. Gutta-percha – An untold story. Endodontology. 2005; 17 (2): 32-6.

  22. Singh H., Markan S., Kaur M., Gupta G., Singh H., Kaur M. S., et al. Endodontic Sealers : Current Concepts and Comparative Analysis. Dent Open J. 2015; 2 (1): 32-7.

  23. Řrstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation : technical , biological and clinical testing. Endod Top. 2005; 12 (3): 25-38.

  24. Tyagi S., Tyagi P., Mishra P. Evolution of root canal sealers: An insight story. Eur J Gen Dent. 2013; 2 (3): 199.

  25. Camilleri J. Is Mineral Trioxide Aggregate a Bioceramic?. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 1, p. 13-17, mar. 2016. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/ ijds.v18i1.23482.

  26. Debelian G., Trope M. The use of premixed bioceramic materials in endodontics. G Ital Endod. 2016; 30 (2): 70-80.

  27. Trope M., Bunes A., Debelian G. Root filling materials and techniques : bioceramics a new hope ? Endod Top. 2015; 86-96.

  28. Al-Haddad A., Aziz ZACA. Bioceramic- Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. Int J Biomater. 2016; 2016:9753210.

  29. Eldeniz A. U., Shehata M., Högg C., Reichl FX. DNA double-strand breaks caused by new and contemporary endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2016; 49 (12): 1141-51.

  30. Malhotra S. Bioceramic Technology in Endodontics. Br J Med Med Res. 2014; 4 (12): 2446-54.

  31. Tay F. R., Pashley D. H., Rueggeberg F. A., Loushine R. J., Weller R. N. Calcium Phosphate Phase Transformation Produced by the Interaction of the Portland Cement Component of White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate with a Phosphate-containing Fluid. J Endod. 2007; 33 (11): 1347-51.

  32. Han L., Okiji T. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2011; 44 (12): 1081-7.

  33. Arias-Moliz M. T., Camilleri J. The effect of the final irrigant on the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers. J Dent. 2016; 52: 30-6.

  34. Donnermeyer D., Bunne C., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 (2): 811-817.

  35. Sarkar N. K., Caicedo R., Ritwik P., Moiseyeva R., Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2005; 31 (2): 97-100.

  36. Atmeh A. R., Chong E. Z., Richard G., Festy F., Watson T. F. Dentin-cement Interfacial Interaction: Calcium Silicates and Polyalkenoates. J Dent Res. 2012; 91 (5): 454-9.

  37. Zhang H., Shen Y., Ruse N. D., Haapasalo M. Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers by Modified Direct Contact Test Against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2009; 35 (7): 1051-5.

  38. Zhang W., Li Z., Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107 (6): 79-82.

  39. Reyes-Carmona J. F., Felippe M. S., Felippe W. T. A phosphate-buffered saline intracanal dressing improves the biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate apical plugs. J Endod. 2010; 36 (10): 1648-52.

  40. Viapiana R., Moinzadeh A. T., Camilleri L., Wesselink P. R., Tanomaru Filho M., Camilleri J. Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J. 2016; 49 (8): 774-82.

  41. McMichael G. E., Primus C. M., Opperman L. A. Dentinal tubule penetration of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 632-6.

  42. Reyes-Carmona J. F., Felippe M. S., Felippe W. T. The Biomineralization Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Portland Cement on Dentin Enhances the Push-out Strength. J Endod. 2010; 36 (2): 286-91.

  43. Nagas E., Uyanik M. O., Eymirli A., Cehreli Z. C., Vallittu P. K., Lassila L. V. J., et al. Dentin moisture conditions affect the adhesion of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2012; 38 (2): 240-4.

  44. Agrafioti A., Koursoumis A. D., Kontakiotis E. G. Re-establishing apical patency after obturation with Gutta-percha and two novel calcium silicate-based sealers. Eur J Dent. 2015; 9 (4): 457-61.

  45. Hess D., Solomon E., Spears R., He J. Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod. 2011; 37 (11): 1547-9.

  46. Ma J., Al-Ashaw A. J., Shen Y., Gao Y., Yang Y., Zhang C., et al. Efficacy of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for guttapercha removal from oval root canals: A micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2012; 38 (11): 1516-20.

  47. Ersev H., Yilmaz B., Dinçol M. E., Daǧlaroǧlu R. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2012; 45 (8): 756-62.

  48. Neelakantan P., Grotra D., Sharma S. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregatebased root canal sealers: A cone-beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod. 2013; 39 (7): 893-6.

  49. Carpenter M. T., Sidow S. J., Lindsey K. W., Chuang A., McPherson J. C. Regaining apical patency after obturation with gutta-percha and a sealer containing mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2014; 40 (4): 588-90.

  50. Uzunoglu E., Yilmaz Z., Sungur D. D., Altundasar E. Retreatability of root canals obturated using gutta-percha with bioceramic, MTA and resin-based sealers. Iran Endod J. 2015; 10 (2): 93-8.

  51. Kim H., Kim E., Lee S. J., Shin S. J. Comparisons of the Retreatment Efficacy of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin-based Sealers and Residual Sealer in Dentinal Tubules. J Endod. 2015; 41 (12): 2025-30.

  52. Oltra E., Cox T. C., LaCourse M. R., Johnson J. D., Paranjpe A. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42 (1): 19-26.

  53. Suk M., Bago I., Katić M., Šnjarić D., Munitić MŠ, Anić I. The efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming in the removal of calcium silicate-based filling remnants from the root canal after rotary retreatment. Lasers Med Sci. 2017; 32 (9): 2055-2062.

  54. Simsek N., Keles A., Ahmetoglu F., Ocak M. S., Yologlu S., Simsek N., et al. Comparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study. Braz Oral Res 2014; 28 (1):1-7.

  55. TotalFill BC Sealer, Intsructions for use, [PDF on Internet], Available from: http://www.fkg. ch/sites/default/files/201511_Totalfill_BC_ Sealer_ifu_xx.pdf

  56. Endosequence BC Sealer, Instructions for use, [PDF on Internet], Available from: http:// brasselerusadental.com/wp-content/files/B- 3114D-EndoSequence-BC-Sealer-DFU.pdf

  57. BioRoot RCS, Instructions for use, [PDF on Internet], Available from: http:// www.septodontusa.com/sites/default/ files/2016-03/BioRoot-IFU_0.pdf

  58. Khalil I., Naaman A., Camilleri J. Properties of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42 (10): 1529-35.

  59. Prüllage R. K., Urban K., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. Material Properties of a Tricalcium Silicate-containing, a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-containing, and an Epoxy Resin–based Root Canal Sealer. J Endod. 2016; 42 (12): 1784-8.

  60. Siboni F., Taddei P., Zamparini F., Prati C., Gandolfi MG. Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int Endod J. 2017; 50 (2): 120-136.

  61. Loushine B. A., Bryan T. E., Looney S. W., Gillen B. M., Loushine R. J., Weller R. N., et al. Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2011; 37 (5): 673-7.

  62. Qu W., Bai W., Liang Y. H., Gao X. J. Influence of Warm Vertical Compaction Technique on Physical Properties of Root Canal Sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42 (12):1829-33.

  63. Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015; 41 (1): 72-8.

  64. Çelik Ünal G., Üreyen Kaya B., Taç A. G., Keçeci A. D. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: An ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2009; 42 (4): 344-50.

  65. Roggendorf M. J., Legner M., Ebert J., Fillery E., Frankenberger R., Friedman S. Micro-C. T. evaluation of residual material in canals filled with Activ GP or GuttaFlow following removal with NiTi instruments. Int Endod J. 2010; 43 (3): 200-9.

  66. Hassanloo A., Watson P., Finer Y., Friedman S. Retreatment efficacy of the Epiphany soft resin obturation system. Int Endod J. 2007; 40 (8): 633-43.

  67. Rödig T., Hausdörfer T., Konietschke F., Dullin C., Hahn W., Hülsmann M. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2012; 45 (6): 580-9.

  68. Ng Y-L, Mann V., Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival. Int Endod J. 2011; 44 (7): 610-25.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com