medigraphic.com
Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.

2018, Número 4

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Neuroci 2018; 19 (4)


Neurobiología de la percepción de las jerarquías sociales: revisión actual de la literatura

Rizo MLE

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 53
Paginas: 62-70
Archivo PDF: 197.53 Kb.


RESUMEN

Las jerarquías sociales y su percepción son un mecanismo de organización social fundamental en muchas especies de animales, entre las que se incluye el humano, lo cual tiene un profundo impacto en aspectos como la supervivencia, la conducta social y reproductiva y la salud. La dominancia social implica, entre otras cosas, el control de algunos individuos sobre los otros miembros del grupo, así como un mayor acceso a los recursos. Al considerar que, desde el punto de vista evolutivo, el desarrollo social y los procesos cognitivos y emocionales relacionados a esta función están estrechamente vinculados con el desarrollo del cerebro, el objetivo de la presente revisión es describir los mecanismos neurobiológicos implicados en la percepción de la jerarquización social, al enfatizar los principales hallazgos experimentales reportados.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Sidanius J, Pratto F. Social Dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

  2. Wilson EO. Sociobiology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1975.

  3. Hall JA, Coats EJ, LeBeau LS. Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a metaanalysis. Psychological bulletin. 2005; 131: 898.

  4. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. Evolutionary Rules and Primate Societies. In Bateson P. P. G. and Hinde R. A. (Eds.). Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.

  5. Cummins DD. How the social environment shaped the evolution of mind. Synthese. 2000; 122.

  6. Sapolsky RM. The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science. 2005; 308: 648-652.

  7. Wang F, Zhu J, Zhu H, Zhang Q, Lin Z, Hu H. Bidirectional control of social hierarchy by synaptic efficacy in medial prefrontal cortex. Science. 2011; 334: 693-697.

  8. Bickart KC, Wright CI, Dautoff RJ, Dickerson BC, Barrett LF. Amygdala volume and social network size in humans. Nature neuroscience. 2011, 14: 163-164.

  9. Allman M. Evolving brains. Nueva York: Scientific American Library, 2000.

  10. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent ofman. . 1871; 49: 320.

  11. García EG. Desarrollo de la mente: Filogénesis, sociogénesis y ontogénesis. Salamanca: San Esteban. 2010.

  12. Frankel DG, Arbel T. Group formation by two-year olds. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 1980; 3: 287-298.

  13. Robinson GE, Fernald RD, Clayton DF. Genes and social behavior. Science. 2008; 322: 896-900.

  14. Tung J, et al. Social environment is associated with gene regulatory variation in the rhesus macaque immune system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012; 109: 6490-6495.

  15. O’Connell LA, Hofmann HA. Genes, hormones, and circuits: an integrative approach to study the evolution of social behavior. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. 2011; 32: 320-335.

  16. Robinson GE, Fernald RD, Clayton DF. Genes and social behavior, Science. 2008; 322: 896–900.

  17. Creel S. Social dominance and stress hormones. Trends in ecology & evolution 2001; 16: 491-497.

  18. Adolphs R. The neurobiology of social cognition. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2001; 11: 231-239.

  19. Grant KA, Shively CA, Nader MA, Ehrenkaufer RL, Line SW, Morton TE, Gage HD, Mach RH. The effect of social status on striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding characteristics in cynomolgus monkeys assessed with positron emission tomography. Synapse. 1998; 29: 80–83.

  20. Morgan D, Grant KA, Gage HD, Mach RH, Kaplan JR, Prioleau O, Nader SH, Buchheimer N, Ehrenkaufer RL, Nader MA. Social dominance in monkeys: dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5: 169–174.

  21. Martinez D, et al. D2/3 receptor availability in the striatum and social status in human volunteers. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2009; 50: 1287-1287.

  22. Stefanski V, Engler H. Social stress, dominance and blood cellular immunity. Journal of neuroimmunology. 1999; 94: 144-152.

  23. Cole SW, Mendoza SP, Capitanio JP. (2009). Social stress desensitizes lymphocytes to regulation by endogenous glucocorticoids: insights from in vivo cell trafficking dynamics in rhesus macaques. Psychosomatic medicine. 2009; 71: 591.

  24. Watanabe N, Yamamoto M. Neural mechanisms of social dominance. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2015; 9: 154.

  25. Zink CF, et al. Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron. 2008, 58: 273- 283.

  26. Marsh AA, Blair KS, Jones MM, Soliman N, Blair RJ. Dominance and submission: the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and responses to status cues. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2009, 21: 713-724.

  27. Farrow TF, et al. Higher or lower? The functional anatomy of perceived allocentric social hierarchies. Neuroimage. 2011; 57: 1552-1560.

  28. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual review of neuroscience. 1995, 18: 193-222.

  29. Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual review of neuroscience. 2001; 24: 167-202.

  30. Spitzer M, Fischbacher U, Herrnberger B, Grön G, Fehr E. The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron. 2007; 56: 185-196.

  31. Hon N, Ong J, Tan R, Yang TH. Different types of target probability have different prefrontal consequences. Neuroimage. 2012; 59: 655–662.

  32. Kennedy DP, Gläscher J, Tyszka JM, Adolphs R. Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nature neuroscience. 2009; 12: 1226.

  33. Kumaran D, Melo HL, Duzel E. The emergence and representation of knowledge about social and nonsocial hierarchies. Neuron. 2012; 76: 653-666.

  34. Noonan MP, et al. A neural circuit covarying with social hierarchy in macaques. PLoS biology. 2014; 12: e1001940.

  35. Karafin MS, Tranel D, Adolphs R. Dominance attributions following damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004; 16: 1796-1804.

  36. Deaner RO, Khera AV, Platt ML. Monkeys pay per view: adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Current Biology. 2005; 15: 543-548.

  37. Chiao et al. Knowing who’s boss: fMRI and ERP investigations of social dominance perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2008; 11: 201-214.

  38. Li J, Schiller D, Schoenbaum G, Phelps EA, Daw ND. Differential roles of human striatum and amygdala in associative learning. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14:1250–1252.

  39. Deco G, Rolls ET. Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: a unifying theory. Progress in neurobiology. 2005; 76: 236-256.

  40. Wickens JR, Budd CS, Hyland BI, Arbuthnott GW. Striatal contributions to reward and decision making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007; 1104: 192-212.

  41. Feder A, Nestler EJ, Charney DS. Psychobiology and molecular genetics of resilience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009; 10: 446.

  42. Newman SW. The medial extended amygdala in male reproductive behavior a node in the mammalian social behavior network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999, 877: 242-257.

  43. Gregg C, et al. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science. 2010; 329: 643-648.

  44. Kappeler L, Meaney MJ. Epigenetics and parental effects, Bioessays. 2010; 32: 818–827.

  45. Hess U, Blairy S, Kleck RE. The influence of facial emotion displays, gender and ethnicity on judgments of dominance and affiliation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 2000; 24: 265-283.

  46. Knutson, B. Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. (1996) 20, 165-182.

  47. Mignault A, Chaundhuri A. The many faces of a neutral face: head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 2003; 27: 111-132.

  48. Ellyson S, Dovidio J. Power, dominance and nonverbal behavior. New York, NY: Springlag. 1985.

  49. Santamaría-García H, Burgaleta M, Sebastián-Gallés N. Neuroanatomical markers of social hierarchy recognition in humans: a combined ERP/MRI study. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015; 35: 10,843-10,850.

  50. Balconi M, Vanutelli ME. Competition in the brain. The contribution of EEG and fNIRS modulation and personality effects in social ranking. Frontiers in psychology. 2016; 7: 1587.

  51. Balconi M, Pagani S. Personality correlates (BAS-BIS), self-perception of social ranking, and cortical (alpha frequency band) modulation in peer-group comparison. Physiology & behavior. 2014; 133: 207-215.

  52. Breton A, et al. Face the hierarchy: ERP and oscillatory brain responses in social rank processing. PloS one. 2014; 9: e91451.

  53. Reuderink B, Mühl C, Poel M. Valence, arousal and dominance in the EEG during game play. International journal of autonomous and adaptive communications systems. 2013; 6: 45-62.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com