medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2017, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev ADM 2017; 74 (2)


Restauración postendodóncica, técnica con postes accesorios de fibra de vidrio

Cedillo VJJ, Cedillo FVM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 63
Paginas: 79-89
Archivo PDF: 837.71 Kb.


RESUMEN

Utilizar esta técnica implica grandes ventajas, ya que se reduce el volumen de cemento de resina, lo que disminuye la probabilidad de contracción, formación de burbujas y vacíos internos, los cuales representan áreas de debilidad en la restauración postendodóncica. Esta técnica ya ha sido propuesta y debidamente investigada por algunos autores. Se aplica en dientes con conductos radiculares amplios que han sido debilitados por restauraciones deficientes, desmineralización de la dentina, filtraciones en la corona y poste radicular o simplemente conductos amplios en pacientes de corta edad. Tenemos la firme convicción de que no podemos garantizar la permanencia de un órgano dental en la cavidad oral, pero sí podemos intentar prolongar su permanencia en el alvéolo el mayor tiempo posible. La técnica que se describe en el presente artículo consiste en colocar postes accesorios de fibra de vidrio después del poste principal, logrando reducir el espesor de película del agente cementante a un grado ideal.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Fauchard P. The surgeon dentist. 2nd. ed. Vol. 11: London: Butterworth (ed. En inglés); 1946. pp. 77-80.

  2. Standle JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Endodontic dowells effects of retentive parameters. J Dent Res. 1976; 55: 290.

  3. Newberg RE, Pameier CH. Retentive properties of post and core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1976; 36: 636-643.

  4. Hanson EC, Caputo AA. Cementing mediums and retentive characteristics of dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1974; 32: 551-557.

  5. Lamas LC, Alvarado MS, Pari ER. Poste anatómico preformado: caso clínico. J Odontol Sanmarquina. 2009; 12 (1): 33-35.

  6. Sorensen J, Martinoff J. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 1: 780-784.

  7. Ake Linde L. Uso de composites en combinación con un poste intrarradicular con muñón, en una pieza tratada endodónticamente. Aspectos clínicos de la técnica. Quintessence (ed. esp). 1995; 8 (3): 10-16.

  8. Ferrari M, Scotti R. Postes de fibra, características y aplicaciones clínicas. Roma: Masson. 2002: 91-96.

  9. Cedillo JJ, Cedillo JE, Espinosa R. Poste anatómico: reporte de un caso clínico. Rodyb. 2014; III (2): 1-10.

  10. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring en- dodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71 (6): 565-567.

  11. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 255-260.

  12. Bonfante E, Pegoraro LF, de Góes MF, Carvalho RM. SEM observation of the bond integrity of fiber-reinforced composite posts cemented into root canals. Dent Mat. 2008; 24: 483-491.

  13. Cedillo JJ, Cedillo JE. Restauración postendodóntica en conductos radiculares amplios. Revista ADM 2014; 71 (1): 36-47.

  14. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 9-13.

  15. Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core 
for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5 (3): 243-247.

  16. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM Evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7 (3): 235-240.

  17. Boudrias P, Sakkal S, Petrova Y. Anatomical post design meets quartz fiber technology: rationale and case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22 (4): 37-340.

  18. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. A new concept of corono-radicular reconstruction. Chir Dent Fr. 1990; 60 (542): 69-77.

  19. Faria-e-Silva AL, Pedrosa-Filho CF. Effect of relining on fiber post retention to root canal. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17 (6): 600-604.

  20. D’Arcangelo C, Canella M, De Angelis F, D’Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 193-198.

  21. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod. 2005; 31: 608-612.

  22. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod. 2005; 31: 584-589.

  23. Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M. The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent 
Mater. 2007; 23: 159-166.

  24. Valandro LF, Filho OD, Valera MC, de Araujo MA. The effect of adhesive systems on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7 (4): 331-336.

  25. Mount, GJ. Atlas práctico de cementos de ionómero de vidrio. Guía clínica. Barcelona; Salvat, 1990.

  26. Hattab FN, El-Mowaly OM, Salem NS. Estudio in vivo de la liberación de flúor de un cemento de ionómero de vidrio. Quintessence (ed. esp). 1992; 5: 437-440.

  27. García R et al. Gingival tissue response to restorations of deficient cervical contours using a glass ionomer material. J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 8: 68-74.

  28. Koch G, Hatoboovuc S. Glass ionomer as a fluoride release system in vivo. Swed Dent J. 1990; 14: 267-273.

  29. Galan D. Aplicación clínica de restauraciones del ionómero de vidrio Geristore en la dentición del anciano. J Esthet Dent (ed. esp). 1992; 2: 28-33.

  30. Schwartz J, Anderson MH, Pelleu GB Jr. Reducing microleakage with the glass ionomer resin sandwich technique. Oper Dent. 1990; 15: 186-192.

  31. Mount GJ. Atlas of glass ionomer cements. London; Martin Dunitz; 1990, pp. 1-4.

  32. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride uptake and release from a glass-ionomer. Swed Dent J. 1991; 15: 253-258.

  33. Navarro MF, Bresciani E, Esteves T, Cestari T, Henostroza N. Tratamiento restaurador atraumático: Manual clínico. Lima. International Association for Dental Research-Sección Perú. 2007, pp. 12-16.

  34. Frencken JE, Holmgreen CJ. Atraumatic restorative treatment for dental caries. Nijmegen, STI Book b v: 1999.

  35. Cedillo VJ. Ionómero de vidrio de alta densidad como base en la técnica restauradora de Sadwich. Revista ADM. 2011; 68 (1): 39-47.

  36. Forsten F. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers. Scand J Dent Res. 1991; 99: 241-245.

  37. Francci C, Deaton TG, Arnold RR, Swift EJ Jr., Perdigão J, Bewden JW. Fluoride release from restorative materials and its effect on dentin desmineralization. J Dent Res. 1999; 78: 1647-1647-1654.

  38. Perrin C, Persin M, Sarrazin J. A comparison of fluoride release from four glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int. 1999; 25 (9): 603-608.

  39. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ, Seddon RP. Caries inhibition by a resin modified and conventional glass ionomer cement in vitro. J Dent. 1996; 24 (1-2): 91-94.

  40. Hidalgo RN, Pignata VS, Martucci DG. Adaptación e integridad del cementado de endopostes de fibra de cuarzo, con la técnica de inyectado en conductos radiculares amplios. Actas Odontológicas. 2012; 9 (1): 5-14.

  41. Martelli-Júnior, H, Gonini-Júnior A, Wang L, Fabre HS, Pereira WB. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber accessory posts. J Dent Res. 2005; 84 (Spec. Iss. B).

  42. Leendert B, Bertoldi A, Kogan E. Fiber post techniques for anatomical root variations. Dentistry Today. 2011; 30 (5): 106-111.

  43. Maceri F, Martignoni M, Vairo G. Mechanical behavior of endodontic restorations with multiple. Journal of Biomechanics. 2007; 40: 2386-2398.

  44. Latempa AA, Almeida SA, Nunes NF, Silva EM, Guimaraes JA, Poskus LT. Techniques for restoring enlarged canals: an evaluation of fracture resistance and bond strength. International Endodontic Journal. 2015; 48 (1): 28-36.

  45. Clavijo VG, Reis JM, Kabbach W, Silva AL, Oliveira JO, Andrade MF. Fracture strength of flared bovine roots restored with different intra radicular posts. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 574-578.

  46. Silva GR, Santos-Filho PC, Simamoto-Júnior PC, Martins LR, Mota AS, Soares CJ. Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22: 230.

  47. Li Q, Xu B, Wang Y, Cai Y. Effects of auxiliary fiber posts on endodontically treated teeth with flared canals. Oper Dent. 2011; 36: 380-389.

  48. Alkumru, H., Akkayan, B et al. Fracture strength of teeth in oval-shaped root Canals, restored with posts and accessory post systems. Canadian Journal of Restorative Dentistry & Prosthodontics. 2013; 6 (1).

  49. Gomes GM, Rickli EH, Gomes OM, Rezende EC, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD et al. Fracture strength of bonded fiber-post techniques to flared roots. J Dent Res. 2013; 92:

  50. Moosavi H, Maleknejad F, Kimyai S. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using three root-reinforcement methods. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; 1 (9): 30-37.

  51. Salvio L, Gonini A Jr., Moura SK, Chaves MD, Lopes MB. Resin cement and glass fibre accessories posts: photoelastic analysis. J Dent Res. Dent Res. Vol 88 (Spec. Iss A) Abstract 1840 2009.

  52. Braz, R, Conceição, AAB, Conceição, E.N., Loretto, S.C., Lyra, A.M.V.C., Silva, .A.K.S. Evaluation of reinforcement materials used on filling of weakened roots. J Dent Res. 84 (Spec. Iss. A) Abstract #1733.

  53. Asmussen E, Attal J-P, Degrange M. Factors affecting the energy of adherence of experimental cements bonded to a nickel-chromium alloy. J Dent Res. 1995; 74: 715-720.

  54. Khalil A. Bond strength of overdenture locator posts cemented with seven luting agents. J Cont Dent Prac. 14 (4): 675-680.

  55. Bogra P, Kaswan S. Etching with EDTA. An in vitro study. J. Indian Soc Pedo Prev. Dent; 2003; 21 (2): 79-83.

  56. Habelitz S, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Balooch G, Marshall GW Jr. In situ atomic force microscopy of partially demineralized human dentin collagen brils. J Struct Biol. 2002; 138: 227-236.

  57. Pashley DH, Agee KA, Car valho RM, Lee Kw, Tay FR, Callison TE. Effects of water and water-free polar solvents on the tensile properties of demineralized dentin. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 347-352.

  58. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dental Materials. 2005; 21: 36-42.

  59. Dietschi D, Avishai S. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of the endodontically treated teeth: A sistematic review of literature-Part 1. Composition and micro and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence International. 2007; 38: 733-743.

  60. Baldissara P. Mechanical Properties and in vitro evaluation. In: Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber Post. Characteristics and Clinical Applications. Milano: Masson; 2002.

  61. Kogan E, Zyman G. Estudio comparativo de la adaptación de 3 sistemas prefabricados de postes endodónticos a la preparación del conducto. Revista ADM. 2004; 61 (3): 102-108.

  62. Teixeira EC, Teixeira FB, Piasick JR, Thompson JY. An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137: 1006-1012.

  63. Cedillo J, Váldez C. Estudio comparativo de tres técnicas para la reducción del espesor del cemento a nivel cervical, en conductos amplios restaurados con postes de fibra de vidrio. Análisis del MEB. RODYB. 2016; 5 (2): 23-33.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com