medigraphic.com
Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC

2016, Número 4

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2016; 14 (4)


Aplicaciones y uso del dermatoscopio en la dermatología general. Una revisión

Simón-Díaz P, Jesús-Silva A, Arroyo-Camarena S, Barragán-Estudillo Z, Gutiérrez S, Martínez-Velasco A, Asz-Sigall D, Roldán-Marín R

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 91
Paginas: 299-317
Archivo PDF: 529.20 Kb.


RESUMEN

La dermatoscopía es una técnica auxiliar de diagnóstico no invasiva que permite incrementar la certeza diagnóstica en diversas enfermedades cutáneas. Si bien su aplicación en la evaluación de lesiones pigmentadas y en la detección temprana de cáncer de piel es bien conocida, el uso del dermatoscopio en la dermatología general hoy en día va desde procesos infecciosos (entomodermatoscopía), trastornos inflamatorios (inflamoscopía), padecimientos ungueales, alopecia y trastornos capilares, hasta su uso como auxiliar diagnóstico para el dermatopatólogo (dermatoscopía ex vivo). En este artículo de revisión se pretende brindar ejemplos y una breve revisión de las aplicaciones del dermatoscopio en la dermatología general para resaltar el valor de su uso en la práctica clínica diaria para el dermatólogo.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Carrera C, Zaballos P, Puig S et al. Correlación histológica en dermatoscopía, lesiones melanocíticas y no melanocíticas. Criterios dermatoscópicos de nevus melanocíticos, Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2004; 32(2): 47-60.

  2. Malvehy J, Puig S, Argenziano G et al. Principles of dermoscopy, Barcelona, Gede, 2002.

  3. Carli P, De Giorgi V, Soyer HP et al. Dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: a new semiology for the dermatologists, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000; 14: 353-69.

  4. Fritsch P y Pechlaner R, The pigmented network: a new tool for the diagnosis of pigmented lesions, J Invest Dermatol 1980; 74: 458-9.

  5. Bahmer FA, Fritsch P, Kreusch J et al. Terminology in surface microscopy, J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 1159-62.

  6. Menzies SW, Crotty K y McCarcthy WH. The morphologic criteria of the pseudopod in surface microscopy, Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 436-40.

  7. Kittler H, Marghoob A, Argenziano G et al. Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy, J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74(6):1093-106.

  8. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet, J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679-93.

  9. Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S et al. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013; 27(7): 805-14.

  10. Bizhan B, Linglei M, Roya N et al. From melanocyte to metastatic malignant melanoma, en Dermatol Res Pract 2010, Article id 583748, 8 pp.

  11. Cust AE, Armstrong BK, Goumas C et al. Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early- onset melanoma, Int. J. Cancer 2011; 128(10): 2425-35.

  12. Tsao H, Chin L, Garraway L y Fisher DE. Melanoma: from mutations to medicine, Genes Dev 2012; 26(11): 1131-55.

  13. Miller AJ y Mihm MC. Mechanisms of disease, N Eng J Med 2006; 355: 51-65.

  14. Moloney FJ, Guitera P y Coates E. Detection of primary melanoma in individuals at extreme high risk: a prospective 5-year follow-up study, jama Dermatol 2014; 150(8): 819-27.

  15. Potrony M, Puig-Butillé JA, Aguilera P et al. Increased prevalence of lung, breast, and pancreatic cancers in addition to melanoma risk in families bearing the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A mutation: implications for genetic counseling, J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 018702: 888-95.

  16. Salerni G, Terán T, Alonso C y Fernández-Bussy R. The role of dermoscopy and digital dermoscopy follow-up in the clinical diagnosis of melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic features of 99 consecutive primary melanomas, Dermatol Pract Concept 2014; 4(4): 39-46.

  17. Haenssle H, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C et al. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors, Arch Dermatol 2010; 146(3): 257-64.

  18. Gadens GA. Lack of compliance: a challenge for digital dermoscopy follow-up, An Bras Dermatol 2014; 89(2): 242-4.

  19. Terushkin V, Dusza SW, Scope A et al. Changes observed in slowgrowing melanomas during long-term dermoscopic monitoring, Br J Dermatol 2012; 166(6): 1213-20.

  20. Salerni G, Carrera C, Lovatto L et al. Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy (“two-step method of digital follow-up”) in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma, J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67(1): e17-27.

  21. Perier-Muzet M, Thomas L, Poulalhon N et al. Melanoma patients under vemurafenib: prospective follow-up of melanocytic lesions by digital dermoscopy, J Invest Dermatol 2014; 134: 1351-8.

  22. Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A et al. Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline-Update 2012, Eur J Cancer 2012; 48(15): 2375-90.

  23. Pflugfelder, A, Kochs, C, Blum, A. et al. Malignant melanoma S3-guideline diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013; 11(Suppl 6): 1-116.

  24. Marzuka A y Book S. Basal cell carcinoma: pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, histopathology, and management, Yale J Biol Med 2015; 88: 167-79.

  25. Khalesi M, Whiteman D, Rosendahl C et al. Basal cell carcinomas on sun-protected vs. sun-exposed body sites: a comparison of phenotypic and environmental risk factors, Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2015; 31: 202-11.

  26. Argenziano G, Giacomel J, Zalaudek I et al. A clinico-dermoscopic approach for skin cancer screening, Dermatol Clin 2013; 31: 525-34.

  27. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Argenziano G et al. The dermatoscopic universe of basal cell carcinoma, Dermatol Pract Concept 2014; 4(3): 2.

  28. Lallas A, Pyne J, Kyrgidis A et al. The clinical and dermoscopic features of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma depend on the histopathological grade of differentiation, Br J Dermatol 2015; 172: 1308-15.

  29. Zalaudek I, Giacomel J, Schmid K et al. Dermatoscopy of facial actinic keratosis, intraepidermal carcinoma, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma: a progression model, J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66: 589-97.

  30. Ritchie SA, Patel MJ y Miller SJ. Therapeutic options to decrease actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma incidence and progression in solid organ transplant recipients: a practical approach, Dermatol Surg 2012; 38: 1604-21, doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02452.x.

  31. Lallas A, Tschandl P, Kyrgidis A et al. Dermoscopic clues to differentiate facial lentigo maligna from pigmented actinic keratosis, Br J Dermatol 2016; 1-7.

  32. Martín JM, Bella-Navarro R y Jordà E. Vascular patterns in dermoscopy, Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012; 103: 357-75, doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2011.11.005.

  33. Shiiya CH, Hata H, Inamura Y et al. Dermoscopic features of hidroacanthoma simples: Usefulness idistinguishing it from Bowen’s disease and seborrheic keratosis, Journal of Dermatology 2015; 42.

  34. Sato Y, Fujimura T, Tamabuchi E et al. Dermoscopy findings of hidroacanthoma simplex, Case Reports in Dermatology 2014; 6(2): 154-8.

  35. Espinosa AED, Ortega BC, Venegas RQ y Ramírez RG. Dermoscopy of non-pigmented eccrine poromas: study of Mexican cases, Dermatology Practical & Conceptual 2013; 3(1): 25-8.

  36. Lacarrubba F, Pellacani G, Gurgone S et al. Advances in non-invasive techniques as aids to the diagnosis and monitoring of therapeutic response in plaque psoriasis: a review, Int J Dermatol 2015; 54(6): 626-34.

  37. Lallas A, Kyrgidis A, Tzellos TG et al. Accuracy of dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of psoriasis, dermatitis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea, Br J Dermatol 2012; 166(6): 1198-205.

  38. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopic pattern of psoriatic lesions on specific body sites, Dermatology 2014; 228(3): 250-4.

  39. Moscarella E, Longo C, Zalaudek I et al. Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy clues in the diagnosis of psoriasis and porokeratosis, J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69(5): e231-3. Disponible en: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.06.008.

  40. Vásquez-López F, Palacios-García L, Gómez-Díez S. y Argenziano G. Dermoscopy for discriminating between lichenoid sarcoidosis and lichen planus, Arch Dermatol 2011; 147(9): 1130.

  41. Friedman P, Sabban E.C, Marcucci C et al. Dermoscopic findings in different clinical variants of lichen planus. Is dermoscopy useful?, Dermatol Pract Concept 2015; 5(4): 51-5.

  42. Vázquez-López F, Gómez-Díez S, Sánchez J. y Pérez-Oliva N. Dermoscopy of active lichen planus, Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(8): 1092.

  43. Güngör S¸, Topal IO y Göncü EK. Dermoscopic patterns in active and regressive lichen planus and lichen planus variants: a morphological study, Dermatol Pract Concept 2015; 5(2): 45-53.

  44. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Lefaki I et al. Dermoscopy of discoid lupus erythematosus, Br J Dermatol 2013; 168(2): 284-8.

  45. Stinco EEG. Dermoscopy in general dermatology: a practical overview, Dermatology and Therapy 2016; Disponible en: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s13555-016-0141-6.

  46. Lallas A, Argenziano G, Apalla Z et al. Dermoscopic patterns of common facial inflammatory skin diseases, J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 2014; 28(5): 609-14.

  47. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Argenziano G et al. Clues for differentiating discoid lupus erythematosus from actinic keratosis, J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69(1): e5–6. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.01.041.

  48. Errichetti E, Piccirillo A, Viola L y Stinco G. Dermoscopy of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Int J Dermatol 2016; 55(11): 1-3.

  49. Pellicano R, Tiodorovic-Zivkovic D, Gourhant JY et al. Dermoscopy of cutaneous sarcoidosis, Dermatology 2010; 221(1): 51-4.

  50. Ramadan S, Hossam D y Saleh MA. Dermoscopy could be useful in differentiating sarcoidosis from necrobiotic granulomas even after treatment with systemic steroids, Dermatol Pract Concept 2016, 6(3): 17-22.

  51. Bombonato C, Argenziano G, Lallas A et al. Orange color: a dermoscopic clue for the diagnosis of granulomatous skin diseases, J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72(1): S60-3. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jaad.2014.07.059.

  52. Nakamura RC y Costa MC. Dermatoscopic findings in the most frequent onychopathies: descriptive analysis of 500 cases, Int J Dermatol 2012; 51: 483-96.

  53. Heikkilä H y Stubb S. The prevalence of onychomycosis in Finland, Br J Dermatol 1995; 133: 699-703.

  54. Westerberg DP y Voyack MJ. Onychomycosis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment, Am Fam Physician 2013; 88: 762-70.

  55. Welsh O, Welsh E, Ocampo-Candiani J et al. Dermatophytoses in Monterrey, México, Mycoses 2006; 49: 119-23.

  56. Seebacher C, Bouchara JP y Mignon B. Updates on the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections, Mycopathologia 2008; 166: 335-52.

  57. Kaur R, Kashyap B y Bhalla P. Onychomycosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management, Indian J Med Microbiol 2008; 26: 108-16.

  58. Gupta AK, Drummond-Main C, Cooper EA et al. Systematic review of nondermatophyte mold onychomycosis: diagnosis, clinical types, epidemiology, and treatment, J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66: 494-502.

  59. Richert B, Lateur N, Theunis A et al. New tools in nail disorders, Semin Cutan Med Surg 2009; 28: 44-8.

  60. Piraccini BM, Balestri R, Starance M y Rech G. Nail digital dermoscopy (onychoscopy) in the diagnosis of onychomycosis, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013; 27: 509-13.

  61. Jesús-Silva MA, Fernández Martínez R, Roldán-Marín R y Arenas R. Dermoscopic patterns in patients with a clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis: results of a prospective study including data of potassium hydroxide (koh) and culture examination, Dermatol Pract Concept 2015; 5(2): 5.

  62. Crignis G y Valgas N. Dermatoscopy of onychomycosis, Int J Dermal, 2014, 53: 80-8.

  63. Lilly KK, Koshnick RL, Grill JP et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for toenail onychomycosis: a repeated-measure, single-blinded, cross-sectional evaluation of 7 diagnostic tests, J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 620-6.

  64. Karaarslan K, Acar A, Aytimur D et al. Dermoscopic features in fungal melanonychia, Clin Exp Derm 2015; 40: 271-8.

  65. Russo T, Piccolo V, Lallas A y Argenziano G. Recent advances in dermoscopy, F1000 Research 2016; 5(F1000 Faculty Rev): 184.

  66. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G y Delfino M. Epiluminescence microscopy. A new approach to in vivo detection of Sarcoptes scabiei, Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 751-3.

  67. Walter B, Heukelbach J, Fengler G et al. Comparison of dermoscopy, skin scraping, and the adhesive tape test for the diagnosis of scabies in a resource-poor setting, Arch Dermatol 2011; 147: 468-73.

  68. Lallas A, Giacomel J, Argenziano G et al. Dermoscopy in general dermatology; practical tips for the clinician, Br J Dermatol 2014; 170(3): 514-26, doi: 10.1111/bjd.12685.

  69. Zalaudek I, Lallas A, Moscarella E et al. The dermatologist’s stethoscope– traditional and new applications of dermoscopy, Dermatology Practical & Conceptual 2013; 3(2): 67-71.

  70. Lee DY, Park JH, Lee JH et al. The use of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of plantar wart, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23: 726-8.

  71. Olszewska M, Rudnicka L, Rakowska A et al. Trichoscopy, Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 1007.

  72. Tosti A (ed.). Dermatoscopy of hair and scalp disorders, Londres, Informa Healthcare, 2007.

  73. Wallace MP y De Berker DA. Hair diagnoses and signs: the use of dermatoscopy, Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35: 41-46.

  74. Tosti A y Torres F. Dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of hair and scalp disorders, Actas Dermosifiliogr 2009; 100(Suppl): 114-9.

  75. Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Rakowska A et al. Trichoscopy: a new method for diagnosing hair loss, J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7: 651-4.

  76. Silverberg NB, Silverberg JI y Wong ML. Trichoscopy using a handheld dermoscope: an in-office technique to diagnose genetic disease of the hair, Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 600-1.

  77. Karadag Kose O y Gulec AT. Clinical evaluation of alopecias using a handheld dermatoscope, J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67(2):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.08.019.

  78. Micali G, Lacarrubba F, Massimino D y Schwartz RA. Dermatoscopy: alternative uses in daily clinical practice, J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64: 1135-46.

  79. Tosti A y Gray J. Assessment of hair and scalp disorders, J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2007; 12: 23-7.

  80. Ross EK, Vincenzi C y Tosti A. Videodermatoscopy in the evaluation of hair and scalp disorders, J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 799-806.

  81. Pierard-Franchimont C, Uhoda E y Pierard GE. Quantification of dandruff adherence to hair, Int J Cosmet Sci 2005; 27: 279-82.

  82. Rakowska A, Slowinska M, Kowalska-Oledzka E et al. Dermatoscopy in female androgenic alopecia: method standardization and diagnostic criteria, Int J Trichology 2009; 1: 123-30.

  83. Fu JM, Starace M y Tosti A. A new dermoscopic finding in healthy children, Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 596-7.

  84. Shoo BA, Sagebiel RW y Kashani-Sabet M. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma at a melanoma referral center, J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62: 751-6.

  85. Lodha S, Saggar S, Celebi JT et al. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of difficult melanocytic neoplasms in the clinical setting, J Cutan Pathol 2008; 35: 349-52.

  86. Dyson SW, Bass J, Pomeranz J et al. Impact of through block sampling in the histologic evaluation of melanomas, Arch Dermatol 2005; 141: 734-6.

  87. Troxel DB. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma: findings of a risk management panel study, Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 1278-83.

  88. High WA. Malpractice in dermatopathology: principles, risk mitigation, and opportunities for improved care for the histologic diagnosis of melanoma and pigmented lesions, Clin Lab Med 2008; 28: 261-84.

  89. Waller JM y Zedek DC. How informative are dermatopathology requisition forms completed by dermatologists? A review of the clinical information provided for 100 consecutive melanocytic lesions, J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62: 257-61.

  90. Merkel EA, Amin SM, Lee CY et al. The utility of dermoscopy-guided histologic sectioning for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions: a casecontrol study, J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74: 1107-13.

  91. Cabete J, Lencastre A y João A. Combined use of ex vivo dermoscopy and histopathology for the diagnosis of melanocytic tumors, Am J Dermatopathol 2016; 38: 189-93.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com