medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Digital)

2016, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2016; 29 (1)


Obtención, interpretación y usos del electrorretinograma multifocal

Pérez GE, Hernández EO, Rodríguez MY, Gómez GJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 54
Paginas: 105-123
Archivo PDF: 490.08 Kb.


RESUMEN

Las pruebas electrofisiológicas oculares constituyen un variado grupo de herramientas diagnósticas de extremada relevancia, sobre todo por su objetividad. El electrorretinograma multifocal se encuentra entre los más novedosos y promisorios de este selecto grupo y, a la vez, entre las de mayor complejidad de obtención. Se realiza una revisión bibliográfica de los aspectos relacionados con la obtención, representación y aplicaciones clínicas del electrorretinograma multifocal.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Microsoft® Encarta® 2012. DVD. Microsoft Corporation; 2011.

  2. Miyake Y. Electrodiagnosis of retinal diseases. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag; 2006;3:33-8.

  3. Holder G. Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease. Eye. 2004;18:1133-43.

  4. Marmor MF, Holder GE, Seeliger MW, Yamamoto S. International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;108:107-14.

  5. Hood DC, Odel J, Chen C, Winn B. The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neurophthalmol. 2003;23(3):225-35.

  6. Hood DC. Assesing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2000;19(5):607-46.

  7. Jagle H, Heine J, Kurtenbach AL. M-cone ratio estimates of the outer and inner retina and its impact on sex differences in ERG amplitudes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2006;113:105-13.

  8. Odom JV, Leys M, Weinstein GW. Clinical Visual Electrophysiology. In: Tasman W, Jaeger E, editors. Duane's Ophthalmology. CD-ROM User Guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

  9. Lam BL. Focal and Multifocal Electroretinogram. In: Electrophysiology of Vision. Clinical Testing and Applications. Florida: Taylor & Francis Group; 2005.

  10. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res. 1992;32:433-46.

  11. Andreasson S. Developments in molecular genetics and electrophysiology in inherited retinal disorders. Act Ophthalmol Scandin. 2006;84 (2):161-8.

  12. Hagan RP, Fisher AC, Brown MC. Examination of short binary sequences for mfERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol. 2006;113:21-7.

  13. Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons JS, et al. ISCEV guidelines for clinical multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol. 2011;116:1-11.

  14. Hood DC. The multifocal electroretinogram (mf ERG): applications and limitations. Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2003;23:225-35.

  15. Kaltwasser C, Horn FK, Kremers J, Juenemann A. A comparison of the suitability of cathode ray tube (CRT) and liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors as visual stimulators in mfERG diagnostics. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;118:179-218.

  16. Sutter EE. The interpretation of multifocal binary kernels. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;100:49-75.

  17. Bock M, Andrassi M, Belitsky I, Lorenz B. A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems. Doc Ophthalmol. 1999;97:157-78.

  18. Marmarelis PZ, Marmarelis VZ. Analysis of physiological systems: the white noise approach. New York: Plenum Press; 1978.

  19. Sutter EE. A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. Cleveland: Nonlinear Visión; 1992:171-220.

  20. Hood DC, Ju Li. A technique for measuring multifocal ERG records. Trends Opt Photon. 1997;11. p. 280-93.

  21. Patrick H, Chu W, Henry H, Chan L, et al. Effects of unsteady fixation on multifocal: electroretinogram (mfERG). Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 244:1273-82.

  22. Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Tanikawa A. Recording multifocal electroretinograms with fundus monitoring. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:1049-52.

  23. Seiple W, Vajaranant TS, Szlyk JP, Clemens C, Holopigian K, Paliga J, et al. Multifocal Electroretinography as a Function of Age: the importance of normative values for older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1783-92.

  24. Nabeshima T, Tazawa Y, Mita M, Sano M. Effects of aging on the first and secondorder kernels of multifocal electroretinogram. Jap J Ophthalmol. 2002;46(3):261-9.

  25. Tam WK, Chan H, Brown B, Leung KW, Woo V, Yap M. Aging and mfERG topography. Eye. 2006;20(1):18-24.

  26. Gundogan FC, Erdurman C, Durukan AH, Sobaci G, Bayraktar MZ. Acute effects of cigarette smoking on multifocal electroretinogram. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007;35(1):32-7.

  27. Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein V. A comparison of the components of the multi-focal and full-field ERGs. Visual Neurosci. 1997;14:533-44.

  28. Poloschek CM, Bach M. Can we do without mydriasis in multifocal ERG recordings? Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;118:121-7.

  29. Wen Y, Klein M, Hood D, Birch D. Relationships among multifocal electroretinogram amplitude, visual field sensitivity and SD-OCT receptor layer thicknesses in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:833-40.

  30. Moon CH, Park TK, Ohn YH. Association between multifocal electroretinograms, optical coherence tomography and central visual sensitivity in advanced retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol. 2012;125(2):113-22.

  31. Park S, Kim SH, Park TK, Ohn YH. Evaluation of structural and functional changes in non-pathologic myopic fundus using multifocal electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2013;126(3). p. 199-210.

  32. Aoyagi R, Hayashi T, Gekka T, Kozaki K, Tsuneoka H. Multifocal electroretinographic evaluation of macular function in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2013;126(3). p. 253-8.

  33. Gerth C, Wright T, Heon E, Westall CA. Assessment of central retinal function in patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(3). p. 1312.

  34. Kretschmann U, Seeliger MW, Ruether K, Usui T, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E. Multifocal electroretinography in patients with Stargardt´s macular dystrophy. Brit J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:267-75.

  35. Holopigian K, Seiple W, Greenstein VC, Hood DC, Wladis EJ, Carr RE. Localized rod and cone ERG responses in patients with RP and cone dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 1998;39:969.

  36. Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Kondo M, Tanikawa A, Miyake Y. Effect of glutamate analogues and inhibitory neurotransmitters on the electroretinograms elicited by random sequence stimuli in rabbits. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 1998;39:2171-6.

  37. Chan HL, Brown B. Multifocal ERG changes in glaucoma. Ophthalmol, Physiol Opt. 1999;19:306-16.

  38. Hasegawa S, Takagi M, Usui T, Takada R, Abe H. Waveform changes of the first orden multifocal electroretinogram in patiens with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalm Vis Sci. 2000;41:1597-603.

  39. Bearse MA, Sutter EE. Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Amer. 1996;13:634-40.

  40. Bearse MA, Sutter EE, Palmowski AM. New developments toward a clinical test of retinal ganglion cell function. Vision Science and its Applications. Osa Tech Dig Ser. 1997;1:24-7.

  41. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Holopigian K, Bauer R, Firoz B, Liebmann JM, et al. An attempt to detect glaucomatous damage to the inner retina with the multifocal ERG. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2000;41:1570-9.

  42. Fortune B, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA, Kondo Y, Mochizuki K, Kitazwa Y. The relationship between multifocal electroretinogram and standard automated perimetry findings in normal tension glaucoma. Glaucoma in the 21st Century. London: Harcourt Publishers Ltd; 2000. p. 73-8.

  43. Nag Y, Chan HL, Chu PW, Siu AW, To C, Beale BA, et al. Pharmacologically defined components of the normal porcine multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol. 2008;116:165-76.

  44. Palmowski AM, Sutter EE, Bearse MA, Fung W. Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multifocal electroretinogram. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Scie. 1997;38:2586-96.

  45. Li J, Tso M, Lam T. Reduced amplitude and delayed latency in foveal response of multifocal electroretinogram in early age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:287-90.

  46. Gerth C, Delahunt P, Alam S, Morse SL, Werner JS. Cone-Mediated Multifocal Electroretinogram in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124:345-52.

  47. Wu Z, Ayton LN, Guymer RH, Luu CD. Relationship between the second reflective band on optical coherence tomography and multifocal electroretinography in agerelated macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4). p. 2800-6.

  48. Zuo C, Wen F, Li J,Liu Y, Li M. Transitions of multifocal electroretinography following combined intravitreal bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;119:29-36.

  49. Marmor M, Kellner U, Lai T, Lyons J, Mieler W. Revised recommendations on screening for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(2):415-22.

  50. Lai TY, Chan WM, Li H, et al. Multifocal electroretinographic changes in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:794-807.

  51. Lyons JS, Severns ML. Detection of early hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity enhanced by ring ratio analysis of multifocal electroretinography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:801-9

  52. Lyons JS, Severns ML. Using multifocal ERG ring ratios to detect and follow Plaquenil retinal toxicity: a review: Review of mf-ERG ring ratios in Plaquenil toxicity. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;118:29-36.

  53. Pasadhika S, Fishman GA. Effects of chronic exposure to hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine on inner retinal structures. Eye. 2010;24(2). p. 340-6.

  54. McTrusty AD, McCulloch DL, Strang NC, McCall A, Parks S, Brown A, Kennedy GJ. Idiopathic, isolated fovea plana with bilateral off-centre multifocal ERGs. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013;126(2):171-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com