medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-3178 (Impreso)
Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, A.C.

2016, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac 2016; 12 (1)


Hiperplasia condilar bilateral manejo quirúrgico. Reporte de caso

Castilla CH, Uribe VB, Salas MJM, Vides LJA

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 10-20
Archivo PDF: 920.36 Kb.


RESUMEN

La hiperplasia condilar mandibular es un padecimiento que se caracteriza por el desarrollo excesivo de la cabeza y del cuello de los procesos condilares así como de la mandíbula, puede ser unilateral o bilateral, lo cual puede condicionar a una discrepancia dentofacial y asimetría facial. La condilectomía alta, la reposición del disco articular y la cirugía ortognática son métodos quirúrgicos que se emplean para la corrección y tratamiento de la hiperplasia condilar. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino de 17 años de edad con diagnóstico de hiperplasia condilar bilateral quien fue intervenido de cirugía ortognática bimaxilar, condilectomía alta bilateral y glosectomía de reducción.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Götz W, Lehmann TS, Appel TR, Rath-Deschner B, Dettmeyer R, Luder HU et al. Distribution of insulin-like growth factors in condylar hyperplasia. Ann Anat. 2007; 189 (4): 347-349.

  2. Nitzan DW, Katsnelson A, Bermanis I, Brin I, Casap N. The clinical characteristics of condylar hyperplasia: experience with 61 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66 (2): 312-318.

  3. Wolford LM, Morales-Ryan CA, García-Morales P, Perez D. Surgical management of mandibular condylar hyperplasia type 1. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2009; 22 (4): 321-329.

  4. Wolford LM, Movahed R, Perez DE. A classification system for conditions causing condylar hyperplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72 (3): 567-595.

  5. Wolford LM. The sagittal split ramus osteotomy as the preferred treatment for mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58 (3): 310-312.

  6. Wolford LM. Concomitant temporomandibular joint and orthognatic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61 (10): 1198-1204.

  7. Stavropoulos F, Dolwick MF. Simultaneous temporomandibular joint and orthognathic surgery: the case against. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61 (10): 1205-1206.

  8. Wolford LM, Cottrell DA. Diagnosis of mocroglossia and indications for reduction glossectomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110 (2): 170-177.

  9. Gasparini G, Saltarel A, Carboni A, Maggiulli F, Becelli R. Surgical management of macroglossia: discussion of 7 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 94 (5): 566-571.

  10. Pripatnanont P, Vittayakittipong P, Markmanee U, Thongmak S, Yipintsoi T. The use of SPECT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34 (4): 364-368.

  11. Laverick S, Bounds G, Wong WL. [18F]-fluoride positron emission tomography for imaging condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 47 (3): 196-199.

  12. Hodder SC, Rees JI, Oliver TB, Facey PE, Sugar AW. SPECT bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis and management of mandibular condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 38 (2): 87-93.

  13. Kaban LB. Mandibular asymmetry and the fourth dimension. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20 Suppl 1: 622-631.

  14. Wolford LM. Stability of orthognatic surgery in class III patients: effect of active condylar hyperplasia and high condylectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67 (9): 29-30.

  15. Saridin CP, Raijmakers PG, Al Shamma S, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG Comparison of different analytical methods used for analyzing SPECT scans of patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38 (9): 942-946.

  16. Avelar RL, Becker OE, Dolzan Ado N, Göelzer JG, Haas OL Jr, de Oliveira RB. Correction of facial asymmetry resulting from hemimandibular hyperplasia: surgical steps to the esthetic result. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23 (6): 1898-1900.

  17. Fariña RA, Becar M, Plaza C, Espinoza I, Franco ME. Correlation between single photon emission computed tomography, AgNOR count, and histomorphologic features in patients with active mandibular condylar hyperplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69 (2): 356-361.

  18. Wolford LM, Mehra P, Reiche-Fischel O, Morales-Ryan CA, García-Morales P. Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121 (2): 136-150; discussion 150-151.

  19. Olate S, Almeida A, Alister JP, Navarro P, Netto HD, de Moraes M. Facial asymmetry and condylar hyperplasia: considerations for diagnosis in 27 consecutive patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013; 6 (10): 937-941.

  20. Wolford LM, Movahed R, Dhameja A, Allen WR. Low condylectomy and orthognatic surgery to treat mandibular condylar osteochondroma: a retrospective review of 37 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72 (9): 1704-1728.

  21. Choung PH, Nam IW. An intraoral approach to treatment of condylar hyperplasia or high condylar process fractures using the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 56 (5): 563-570; discussion 571.

  22. Wolford LM, Mehra P, Reiche-Fischel O, Morales-Ryan CA, García-Morales P. Efficacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121 (2): 136-150; discussion 150-151.

  23. Wolford LM. Stability of orthognatic surgery in class III patients: effect of active condylar hyperplasia and high condylectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67 (9): 29-30.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com