medigraphic.com
ISSN 1527-3172 (Digital)

2012, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

MEDICC Review 2012; 14 (2)


Cross-modal plasticity in cuban visually-impaired child cochlear implant candidates: Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials

Charroó-Ruíz LE, Pérez-Abalo MC, Hernández MC, Álvarez B, Bermejo B, Bermejo S, Galán L, Díaz-Comas L

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 38
Paginas: 23-29
Archivo PDF: 209.89 Kb.


RESUMEN

Sin resumen.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Bavelier D, Neville H. Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jun;3(6):443–52.

  2. Neville HJ, Bavelier D, Corina D, Rauschecker J, Karni A, Lalwani A, et al. Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):922–9.

  3. Bavelier D, Tomann A, Hutton C, Mitchell T, Corina D, Liu G, et al. Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 1;20(17):RC93.

  4. Finney E, Fine I, Dobkins K. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Dec;4(12):1171–3.

  5. Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Gramfman J, Ibañez V, Deiber MP, Dold G, et al. Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):526–8.

  6. Osaki Y, Doi K, Takasawa M, Noda K, Nishimura H, Ihara A, et al. Cortical processing of tactile language in a postlingually deaf-blind subject. Neuroreport. 2004 Feb 9;15(2):287–91.

  7. Obretenova S, Halko MA, Plow EB, Pascual- Leone A, Merabet LB. Neuroplasticity associated with tactile language communication in a deafblind subject. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Jan 4;3:60.

  8. Merabet LB, Pascual-Leone A. Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jan;11(1):44– 52.

  9. Chute PM, Nevis ME. Cochlear implants in people who are deaf-blind. J Visual Impairm Blindness. 1995 May–Jun;89(3):297–301.

  10. Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Axon PR. Cochlear implantation in the deaf-blind. Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):774–7.

  11. El-Kashlan HK, Boerst A, Telian SA. Multichannel cochlear implantation in visually impaired patients. Otol Neurotol. 2001 Jan;22(1):53–6.

  12. Filipo R, Bosco E, Mancini P, Ballantyne D. Cochlear implants in special cases: deafness in the presence of disabilities and/or associated problems. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2004 May;(552):74–80.

  13. Charroó L, Hernández R, Pérez-Abalo M, Machado C, Galán L, Aznielle T. Potenciales Evocados. Técnicas neurofi sológicas y aplicaciones clínicas. Havana: Editorial Academia; 2001. p. 1–25 and 77–114. Spanish.

  14. Standards for short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Bloomfi eld (US): American Clinical Neurophysiology Society; 2006.

  15. Kakigi R, Shibasaki H. Effects of age, gender, and stimulus side on the scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jul;8(3):320–30.

  16. Kakigi R, Shibasaki H. Effects of age, gender, and stimulus side on the scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following posterior tibial nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;9(3):431–40.

  17. MRIsafety.com [Internet]. California (US): Shellock R&D Services, Inc; c2012. Cochlear Implants; [cited 2002 Apr 27]. Available from: http://mrisafe ty.com/safety_article.asp?subject=22.

  18. Colenbrander A. Visual standards. Aspects and ranges of vision loss, with emphasis on population surveys [Internet]. Sydney: International Council of Ophthalmology; 2002 April. Resolution adopted by the International Council of Ophthalmology; [cited 2011 Mar 7]; p 2. Available from: www.icoph.org/pdf/visualstandardsreport.pdf.

  19. Colenbrander A. Visual standards. Aspects and ranges of vision loss, with emphasis on population surveys [Internet]. Sydney: International Council of Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr [cited 2002 Apr 27]. 33 p. Available from: http://www.icoph .org/downloads/visualstandardsreport.pdf.

  20. Charroó L, Aznielle T, Borrego M, Antelo JA, Díaz-Comas L, Suárez A, et al. Adquisición de la respuesta cortical del Potencial Evocado Somatosensorial del nervio tibial con múltiples derivaciones de registro. Rev Ing Electrónica, Automática y Comunicaciones. 2005;16(2):39– 44. Spanish.

  21. Chiappa KH, Hill RA. Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: Interpretation. In: Chiappa KH, editor. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott-Raven; 1997 Mar 24. p. 341–400.

  22. Díaz-Comas L, Borrego M, Bobes MA, Galán L, Carbonell F. Sistema para la obtención y análisis de Potenciales Evocados Endógenos de alta densidad. Memorias del I Congreso Internacional de BioInformática 2004. Havana: Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (CU); 2004. Spanish.

  23. Galán L, Biscay R, Rodríguez JL, Carbonell F, Valdés P. Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Mar;102(3):240–7.

  24. Nikolopoulos TP. Outcomes and predictors in cochlear implantation [doctoral thesis]. [Nottingham (UK)]: University of Nottingham; 2000. p. 138 and p. 166.

  25. Gilley PM, Sharma A, Mitchell TV, Dorman MF. The infl uence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(2):207–18.

  26. Tomblin JB, Barker BA, Spencer LJ, Zhang X, Gantz BJ. The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Aug;48(4):853–67.

  27. Neville HJ, Lawson D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioural study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):268–83.

  28. Sadato N, Okada T, Honda M, Yonekura Y. Critical period for cross-modal plasticity in blind humans: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):389–400.

  29. Stevens AA, Weaver KE. Functional characteristics of auditory cortex in the blind. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 3;196(1):134–8.

  30. Auer ET Jr, Bernstein LE, Sungkarat W, Singh M. Vibrotactile activation of the auditory cortices in deaf versus hearing adults. Neuroreport. 2007 May 7;18(7):645–8.

  31. Collignon O, Lassonde M, Lepore F, Bastien D, Veraart C. Functional cerebral reorganization for auditory spatial processing and auditory substitution of vision in early blind subjects. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Feb;17(2):457–65.

  32. Voss P, Gougoux F, Zatorre RJ, Lassonde M, Lepore F. Differential occipital responses in early- and late-blind individuals during a soundsource discrimination task. Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):746–58.

  33. Neville HJ, Schmidt A, Kutas M. Altered visualevoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res. 1983 Apr 25;266(1):127–32.

  34. Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ. A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear. 2002 Dec;23(6):532–9.

  35. Nikolopoulos TP, Lioumi D, Stamaki S, O´Donoghue GM. Evidence based overview of ophthalmic disorders in deaf children: a literature update. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Feb 27;27(2 Suppl 1):S1–24.

  36. Giraldo G. Breaking the sound barrier: Cuba’s Cochlear Implant Program. MEDICC Rev. 2010 Winter;12(1):13–6.

  37. Vlastarakos PV, Proikas K, Papacharalampous G, Exadaktylou I, Mochloulis G, Nikolopoulos TP. Cochlear implantation under the fi rst year of age—The outcomes. A critical systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Feb;74(2):119–26.

  38. Moller C. Deafblindness: living with sensory deprivation. Lancet. 2003 Dec;362 Suppl:S46–7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com