Ramírez-Ortega AJ, Garrido-Aguirre E

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 15
Paginas: 446-448
Archivo PDF: 208.48 Kb.

FRAGMENTO

Los estudios de la neurofisiología clínica nos permiten realizar una evaluación funcional del sistema nervioso central y periférico que aporta información adicional a la exploración neurológica, la cual en el caso del paciente grave se encuentra limitada por efectos de sedación y en ocasiones de relajantes neuromusculares o hipotermia. Se abordará la utilidad de los diferentes estudios en los escenarios más comunes en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, Emerson RG, Hirsch LJ. Detection of electrographic seizures with continous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology. 2004;62:1743-1748.

2. Oddo M, Carrera E, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Hirsch LJ. Continuous electroencephalography in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2051-2056.

3. DeLorenzo RJ, Waterhouse EJ, Towne AR, Boggs JG, Ko D, DeLorenzo GA, et al. Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after the control of convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1998;39:833-840.

4. Young GB, Jordan KG, Doig GS. An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality. Neurology. 1996;47:83-89.

5. Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, Alldredge B, Bleck TP, Glauser T, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:3-23.

6. Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74:1911-1918.

7. Guérit JM, Amantini A, Amodio P, Andersen KV, Butler S, de Weerd A, et al. Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit (ICU): electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), and electroneuromyography (ENMG). Neurophysiol Clin. 2009;39:71-83.

8. Zandbergen EG, Hijdra A, Koelman JH, Hart AA, Vos PE, Verbeek MM. Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic coma. Neurology. 2006;66:62-68.

9. Daltrozzo J, Wioland N, Mutschler V, Kotchoubey B. Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:606-614.

10. Claassen J, Taccone FS, Horn P, Holtkamp M, Stocchetti N, Oddo M, et al. Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1337-1351.

11. Synek VM. Value of a revised EEG coma scale for prognosis after cerebral anoxia and diffuse head injury. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1990;21:25-30.

12. Cloostermans MC, van Meulen FB, Eertman CJ, Hom HW, van Putten MJ. Continuous electroencephalography monitoring for early prediction of neurological outcome in postanoxic patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2867-2875.

13. Brenner RP. The interpretation of the EEG in stupor and coma. Neurologist. 2005;11:271-284.

14. Pedersen GL, Rasmussen SB, Gyllenborg J, Benedek K, Lauritzen M. Prognostic value of periodic electroencephalographic discharges for neurological patients with profound disturbances of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:44-51.

15. Zandbergen EG, Koelman JH, de Haan RJ, Hijdra A; PROPAC-Study Group. SSEPs and prognosis in postanoxic coma. Neurology. 2006;67:583-586.