medigraphic.com
Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC

2014, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2014; 12 (2)


Criterios dermatoscópicos para el diagnóstico de lesión melanocítica y melanoma cutáneo

Roldán MR, Carlos OB

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 45
Paginas: 142-148
Archivo PDF: 238.96 Kb.


RESUMEN

La dermatoscopia ha incrementado sustancialmente la capacidad para distinguir entre lesiones melanocíticas benignas y malignas, gracias a que permite identificar sus patrones. Según las características observadas, se ha propuesto una nueva clasificación que divide los nevus de origen melanocítico en cuatro categorías: reticular, globular, en “estallido de estrella” y azul homogéneo.
Este artículo describe los criterios dermatoscópicos para el diagnóstico de lesión melanocítica y melanoma cutáneo y proporciona evidencias de la utilidad de la dermatoscopia en el diagnóstico precoz del melanoma.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferara G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Soyer HP. “Proposal of a new classification system for melanocytic naevi”. Br J Dermatol. 2007; 157: 217-227.

  2. Zalaudek I, Manzo M, Ferrara G, Argenziano G. “A new classification of melanocytic nevi based on dermoscopy”. Exp Rev Dermatol. 2008; 3: 477-489.

  3. Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Martella A, Giusti F, Argenziano G, Buccini P, et al. “Intrument-, age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: a multicentre study”. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155: 56-61.

  4. Changchien L, Dusza SW, Agero AL, Korzenko AJ, Braun RP, Sachs D, et al. “Age- and site-specific variation in the dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic nevi: an aid to accurate classification and assessment of melanocytic nevi”. Arch Dermatol. 2007; 143: 1007-1014.

  5. Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Massone C, Koller S, Fink-Puches R, Richtig E, Wolf I, et al. “In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of common naevi with globular, homogeneous and reticular pattern in dermoscopy”. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 158: 1000-1007.

  6. Ferrara G, Soyer HP, Malvehy J, Piccolo D, Puig S, Sopena J, et al. “The many faces of blue nevus: a clinicopathologic study”. J Cutan Pathol. 2007; 34: 543-551.

  7. Blum A, Soyer HP, Garbe C, Kerl H, Rassner G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. “The dermoscopic classification of atypical melanocytic naevi (Clark naevi) is useful to discriminate benign from malignant melanocytic lesions”. Br J Dermatol. 2003; 149: 1159-1164.

  8. Teban L, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M, Kittler H. “Clinical value of a dermatoscopic classification of Clark nevi”. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2003; 1: 292-296.

  9. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Corona R, Sera F, Blum A, et al. “Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study”. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 154: 431-437.

  10. Henning JS, Dusza SW, Wang SQ, Marghoob AA, Rabinovitz HS, Polsky D, et al. “The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 56: 45-52.

  11. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M. “Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis”. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134: 1563-1570.

  12. Gachon J, Beaulieu P, Sei JF, Gouvernet J, Claudel JP, Lemaitre M, et al. “First prospective study of the recognition process of melanoma in dermatological practice”. Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141: 434-438.

  13. Scope A, Dusza SW, Halpern AC, Rabinovitz H, Braun RP, Zalaudek I, et al. “The ‘ugly duckling’ sign: agreement between observers”. Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144: 58-64.

  14. Carli P, De Giorgi V, Crocetti E, Mannone F, Massi D, Chiarugi A, et al. “Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the ‘dermoscopy era’: a retrospective study 1997-2001”. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150: 687-692.

  15. Scope A, Marghoob AA, Dusza SW, Satagopan JM, Agero AL, Benvenuto- Andrade C, et al. “Dermoscopic patterns of naevi in fifth grade children of the Framingham school system”. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 158: 1041-1049.

  16. Zalaudek I, Grinschgl S, Argenziano G, Marghoob AA, Blum A, Richtig E, et al. “Age-related prevalence of dermoscopy patterns in acquired melanocytic naevi”. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 154: 299-304.

  17. Aguilera P, Puig S, Guilabert A, Julià M, Romero D, Vicente A, et al. “Prevalence study of nevi in children from Barcelona: dermoscopy, constitutional and environmental factors”. Dermatology. 2009; 218: 203-214.

  18. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Mordente I, Moscarella E, Corona R, Sera F, et al. “Nevus type in dermoscopy is related to skin type in white persons”. Arch Dermatol. 2007; 143: 351-356.

  19. de Giorgi V, Trez E, Salvini C, Duquia R, De Villa D, Sestini S, et al. “Dermoscopy in black people”. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155: 695-699.

  20. Roldán-Marín R, Puig S, Malvehy J. “Dermoscopic criteria and melanocytic lesions”. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2012; 147: 149-159.

  21. Aktürk AS, Bilen N, Bayrämgürler D, Demirsoy EO, Erdogan S, Kiran R. “Dermoscopy is a suitable method for the observation of the pregnancy-related changes in melanocytic nevi”. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007; 21: 1086-1090.

  22. Zampino MR, Corazza M, Costantino D, Mollica G, Virgili A. “Are melanocytic nevi influenced by pregnancy? A dermoscopic evaluation”. Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32: 1497-1504.

  23. Rubegni P, Sbano P, Burroni M, Cevenini G, Bocchi C, Severi FM, et al. “Melanocytic skin lesions and pregnancy: digital dermoscopy analysis”. Skin Res Technol. 2007; 13:143-147.

  24. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. “Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi and common nevi”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 43: 467-476.

  25. Kittler H, Seltenheim M, Dawid M, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. “Frequency and characteristics of enlarging common melanocytic nevi”. Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136: 316-320.

  26. Nino M, Brunetti B, Delfino S, Panariello L, Russo D. “Spitz nevus: follow- up study of 8 cases of childhood starburst type and proposal for management”. Dermatology. 2009; 218: 48-51.

  27. Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Lorenzoni A, Soyer HP. “Involution: the natural evolution of pigmented Spitz and Reed nevi?” Arch Dermatol. 2007; 143: 549-551.

  28. Pizzichetta MA, Argenziano G, Grandi G, de Giacomi C, Trevisan G, soyer HP. “Morphologic changes of a pigmented Spitz nevus assessed by dermoscopy”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002; 47: 137-139.

  29. Schmoeckel C, Wildi G, Schäfer T. “Spitz nevi versus malignant melanoma: Spitz nevi predominate on the thighs in patients younger than 40 years of age, melanomas on the trunk in patients 40 years of age or older”. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 56: 753-758.

  30. Argenziano G, Scalvenzi M, Staibano S, Brunetti B, Piccolo D, Delfino M, et al. “Dermatoscopic pitfalls in differentiating pigmented Spitz naevi from cutaneous melanomas”. Br J Dermatol. 1999; 141: 788-793.

  31. Bowling J, Argenziano G, Azenha A, Bandic J, Bergman R, Blum A, et al. “Dermoscopy key points: recommendations from the international dermoscopy society”. Dermatology. 2007; 214: 3-5.

  32. Brunetti B, Nino M, Sammarco E, Scalvenzi M. “Spitz naevus: a proposal for management”. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005; 19: 391-393.

  33. Káram-Orantes M, Toussaint-Caire S, Domínguez-Cherit J, Veja-Memije E. “Clinical and histopathological characteristics of malignant melanoma cases seen at ‘Dr. Manuel Gea González’ General Hospital”. Gac Med Mex. 2008; 144: 219-223.

  34. Carlos-Ortega B, Ángeles-Garay U, Gómez G. “Claves dermatoscópicas del melanoma acral lentiginoso”. Dermatol Rev Mex. 2012; 56: 180-186.

  35. Alexandrescu DT. “Melanoma costs: a dynamic model comparing estimated overall costs of various clinical stages”. Dermatol Online J 2009; 15: 1.

  36. Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Johr R, Langford D, Puig S, et al. “Dermoscopy features of melanoma incognito: Indications for biopsy”. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56: 508-513.

  37. Duff CG, Melsom D, Rigby HS, Kenealy JM, Townsend PL. “A 6-year prospective analysis of the diagnosis of malignant melanoma in a pigmented- lesion clinic: even the experts miss malignant melanoma, but not often”. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54: 317-321.

  38. Carli P, Nardini P, Crocetti E, De Giorgi V, Giannotti B. “Frequency and characteristics of melanomas missed at a pigmented lesion clinic: a registry-based study”. Melanoma Res 2004; 14: 403-407.

  39. Lindelof B, Hedblad MA, Sigurgeirsson B. “Melanocytic nevus or malignant melanoma? A large-scale epidemiological study of diagnostic accuracy”. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78: 284-288.

  40. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chiementi S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, et al. “Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet”. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679-693.

  41. Puig S, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Palou J, Massi D, et al. “Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: a combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma”. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 1262-1273.

  42. Salerni G, Lovatto L, Carrera C, Puig S, Malvehy J. “Melanomas detected in a follow-up program compared with melanomas referred to a melanoma unit”. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147: 549-555.

  43. Salerni G, Carrera C, Lovatto L, Puig-Butille JA, Badenas C, Plana E, et al. “Benefits of total-body photography and digital dermatoscopy (“twostep method of digital follow-up”) in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma”. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67: e17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.008.

  44. Weatherhed SC, Haniffa M, Lawrence CM. “Melanomas arising from nevi and de novo melanomas - does origin matter?” Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 72-76.

  45. Salerni G, Carrera C, Lovatto L, Martí-Laborda RM, Isern G, Palou J, et al. “Characterization of 1152 lesions excised over 10 years using total- body photography and digital dermatoscopy in the surveillance of patients at high risk for melanoma”. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67: 836-845.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com