Llorente-Mariñez GM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 27
Paginas: 369-373
Archivo PDF: 154.82 Kb.

FRAGMENTO

INTRODUCCIÓN

La anestesia para procedimientos neuroquirúrgicos necesita proporcionar una adecuada oxigenación cerebral, mantener la hemodinamia, lograr un suave y rápido despertar que permita la valoración neurológica postoperatoria y que dicha anestesia no interfiera en la monitorización electrofisiológica transquirúrgica.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Kaisti KK, Längsjö JW, Aalto S, Olikonen V, Sipilä H, Teräs M. Effects of sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral boold flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:603-613.

2. Kawano Y, Kawaguchi M, Inoue S, et al. Jugular bulb oxygen saturation under propofol or sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia during deliberate mild hypothermia in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16:6-10.

3. Liao R, Li J, Liu J. Volatile induction/maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane increases jugular venous oxygen saturation and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients undergoing craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:369-376.

4. Werner C, Lu H, Engelhard K, et al. Sevoflurane impairs cerebral blood flow autoregulation in rats: reversal by nonselective nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:509-516.

5. Dahyot-Fizelier C, Frasca D, Debaene B. Inhales agents in neuroanesthesia for intracranial surgery: pro or con. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012;31:e229-e234.

6. Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, Cold GE, Petersen CB, Mau S, Hauerberg J, et al. Intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumors: a randomized prospective study of patients subjected to craniotomy in propofol–fentanyl, isoflurane-fentanyl, or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:329-336.

7. Todd MM, Warner DS, Sokoll MD, Maktabi MA, Hindman BJ, Scamman FL, et al. A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy, propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:1005-1020.

8. Talke P, Caldwell JE, Richardson CA. Sevoflurane increases lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in normocapnic patients undergoing transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:127-130.

9. Holmström A, Rosén I, Akeson J. Desflurane results in higher cerebral blood flow than sevoflurane or isoflurane at hypocapnia in pigs. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:400-404.

10. Bundgaard H, Von Oettingen G, Larsen KM, et al. Effects of sevoflurane on intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolism. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:621-627.

11. Sneyd JR, Andrews CJH, Tsubokawa T. Comparison of propofol/remifentanyl and sevoflurane/remifentanyl for maintenance of anaesthesia for elective intracranial surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2005;94:778-783.

12. Lauta E, Abbinante C, Del Gaudio A, Aloj F. Emergence times are similar with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia: results of a multicenter RCT of patients scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy. 2010;22:110-118.

13. Citerio G, Pesenti A, Latini R, Masson S, Barlera S. A multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial evaluating equivalence of inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia during elective craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29:371-379.

14. Ihn CH, Joo JD, Choi JW, Kim DW, Kim YS. Comparison of stress hormone response Interleukin-6 and anaesthetic characteristics of two anaesthetic techniques: volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia using sevoflurane versus total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol and remifentanyl. The Journal International Medical Research. 2009;37:1760-1771.

15. Zhang J, Liang WM. Effects of volatile anesthetics on cortical somatosensory evoked potential and bispectral index. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005;85:2700-2703.

16. Sekimoto K, Nishikawa K, Ishizeki J, et al. The effects of volatile anesthetics on intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation and on partial neuromuscular blockade during propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18:106-111.

17. Schwender D, Conzen P, Klasing S, et al. The effects of anesthesia with increasing end-expiratory concentrations of sevoflurane on midlatency auditory evoked potentials. Anest Analg. 1995;81:817-822.

18. Engelhard K, Werner Ch. Inhalational or intravenous anesthetics for craniotomies? Pro inhalational. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:504-508.

19. Murrell JC, De Groot HN, Psatha E, Hellebrekers LJ. Investigation of changes in the middle latency auditory evoked potential during anesthesia with sevoflurane in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2005;66:1156-1161.

20. Hans P, Bonhomme V. Why we still use intravenous drugs as the basic regimen for neurosurgical anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:498-503.

21. Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of anesthetic fade. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17:13-19.

22. Magni G, La Rosa I, Gimignani S, Melillo G. Early postoperative complications after intracranial surgery. J Neurosurgery Anesthesiology. 2007;19:229-234.

23. Asahi T, Hirota K, Sasaki R, et al. Intravenous anesthetics are more effective than volatile anesthetics on inhibitory pathways in rat hippocampal CA1. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:772-778.

24. Schifilliti D, Grasso G, Conti A, Fodale V. Anaesthetic-related neuroprotection: intravenous or inhalational agents? CNS Drugs. 2010;24:893-907.

25. Summer G, Lirk P, Hoerauf K, Riccabona U, Bodrogi F, Raifer H. Sevoflurane in exhaled air of operation room personnel. Anesth Anal. 2003;97:1070-1073.

26. Hoerauf KH. Waste anaesthetics gases induce sister chromatid exchange in lymphocytes of operating room personnel. Bristish Journal of Anesthesia. 1999;82:764-766.

27. Schwars S, et al. Exposure to sevoflurane and nitrous oxide during four different methods of anesthetics induction. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:925-929.