Sala-Blanch X

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 6
Paginas: 312-313
Archivo PDF: 281.25 Kb.

FRAGMENTO

Sin resumen

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Perlas A, Wong P, Abdallah F, Hazrati LN, Tse C, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block through a common paraneural sheath versus conventional injection: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Reg AnesthPain Med. 2013;38:218-225.

2. Sala-Blanch X, de Riva N, Carrera A, Lopez AM, Prats A, Hadzic A. Ultrasound-guidedpopliteal sciatic block with a single injection at the sciatic division results in faster blockonset than the classical nerve stimulator technique. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:1121-1127.

3. Sala-Blanch X, Lopez AM, Pomes J, Valls-Sole J, Garcia AI, Hadzic A. No clinical or electrophysiologic evidence of nerve injury after intraneural injection during sciatic popliteal block. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:589-595.

4. Tran de QH, Dugani S, Pham K, Al-Shaafi A, Finlayson RJ. A randomized comparison between subepineural and conventional ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:548-552.

5. Prasad A, Perlas A, Ramlogan R, Brull R, Chan V. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block distal to sciatic nerve bifurcation shortens onset time: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:267-271.

6. Buys MJ, Arndt CD, Vagh F, Hoard A, Gerstein N. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa using a lateral approach: onset time comparing separate tibial and common peroneal nerve injections versus injecting proximal to the bifurcation. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:635-637.