2013, Número 2
<< Anterior Siguiente >>
Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2013; 41 (2)
Análise da concordancia diagnóstica entre o diagnóstico presencial e o teledermatológico
Zanini M
Idioma: Portugués
Referencias bibliográficas: 8
Paginas: 60-62
Archivo PDF: 86.01 Kb.
RESUMEN
Sin resumen
REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)
Atmed.org [Homepage]. What is Telemedicine? American Telemedicine Association [citado em 20/03/2001]. Disponível em: http//:www.atmeda. org/whatis.
Graham JV, Kulkarni RG. Informatics in patient care: The internet, telemedicine, and clinical decision support. En: Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, editors. Current medical diagnosis and treatment. California: Lange Medical Books.McGraw-Hill; 2000, pp. 1609-15.
Lesher JL, Davis LS, Gourdin FW, English D, Thompson WO. Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneos diseases: a blinded comparative study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38: 27-31.
Oakley AMM, Astwood DR, Loane M, Duffill MB, Rademaker M, Wootton R. Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology: results of a preliminary study in New Zealand. NZ Med J 1997; 110: 51-3.
Ratner D, Thomas CO, Bickers D. The uses of digital photography in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 749-56.
Atmed.org [Homepage]. Jonathan DC. Predicting the Market for Telemedicine. American Telemedicine Association [citado em 10/04/ 2001]. Disponível em: http//:www.atmeda.org/ resources/marketreports.html.
Gilmour E, Campbell SM, Loane MA, Esmail A, Griffiths CE, Roland MO et al. Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:81-7.
Seuma JMC, Solé MB, Laborda RMM. Teledermatología. Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2005;33: 53-64.