Barrera-Calva E, Pineda-Ledezma RU, Barrera-Mera B

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 79-84
Archivo PDF: 807.43 Kb.

FRAGMENTO

De acuerdo con estudios de diversas disciplinas, parece ser que la naturaleza en el largo recorrido de su evolución, aplicó u otorgó pocos patrones o modelos de comportamiento a sus niveles atómico, subatómico, psicológico y corporal. Aunque de importancia igual resulte la simetría o su deformación, a todos los niveles en la organización atómica y molecular, como lo demuestran muchos de los componentes moleculares que adoptan formas de un perfecto patrón disimétrico molecular a lo cual, Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) lo llamó quiral (1848) (figura 1) dando luz desde entonces a la disciplina que trata el carácter de la dismetría molecular.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Hegstrom RA, Kondepudi DK. The handedness of the universe. Sci Am 1990;249:98-105.

2. Bogen JE. The neurosurgeon’s interest in the corpus csllosum. En E. A. History of Neurosurgery in the professional context green blatt S. H. Ed Park Ridge III Am Assoc of Neurosurgeons 1997.

3. Bouchiat M, Poirter L. An atomic preference between left and right. Sci American 1984.

4. Kondepudi DK, Nelson GW. Weak neutral currents and the origin of biomolecular chirality. Nature 1985;314:438-41.

5. CookJ. Developmental mechanisms and evolutionary origins of vertebrate left-right asymmetries. Biol Rev 2004;79:377- 407.

6. Aggestam F, Cahusac PMB. Behavioral lateralization of tactil performance in the rat. Physiol Behav 2007;91:335-9.

7. Rogers LJ, Zucca P, Vallortigara G. Advantages of having a lateralizaed brain. Proc Roy Soc 2004;B 271,S420-S2.

8. Myers RE, Sperry RW. Interocular transfer of a visual form discrimination habits in cats after transaction of the optic chiasm and corpus callosum. Anat Rec 1953;115:351-2.

9. Sherwood CC, Wahl E, Erwin JM, Hof PR, Hopkins WD. Histological asymmetries of primary motor cortex predict handedness in chimpanzees (pan troglodytes). J Comp Neurol 2007;505:525-37.

10. Nottebohm,F. Nottebohm M. Left hypoglossal dominance in the control of canary and white crown sparrow song. J Comp Physiol A 1976;108:171-92.

11. Bethe SB. Ner vensystem von carcinus maenas I-II Arch Mikroscop. Anat u Entwickluagsmech 1897;50,462-544,590- 639.

12. Sperry RW, Clark E. Interocular transfer of visual discrimination habits in a teleost fish. Physiol Zool 1949;22, 372-78.

13. Kutsch W, Huber F. Zentrale versus periphere kontrolle des gesanges von Grillen (Grillus campestris). Z Vergl Physiologie 1970;67,140-50.

14. Texeira LA, Okazaki HL. Shift of manual preference by lateralized practice generalizes to related motor tasks. Exp Brain Res 2007;183:417-23.

15. Sperry RW, Zaidel E, Zaidel D. Self recognition and social awarenwss in the disconnected minor hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 1979;17:153-66.

16. Doty RW. Two brains, one person. Brain Res Bull 1999;50,423.

17. Little AC, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW. Preferences for symmetry in human face in two cultures: data from the UK and Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gathers. Proc Roy Soc B 2007;271: 3113-7.

18. Tsao DY, Freywald WA, Tootell RBH, Livingstone MS. A cortical region consisting entirely of face selective cells. Science 2006;311:670-4.

19. Fan J, Liu F, Wu J, Day W. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proc Roy Soc 2004;B 271:347-52

20. Wilson M, Daly M. Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proc Roy Soc 2004;B 271:177-9.

21. Zaidel DW. Art and brain: insights from neuorpsychology, biology and evolution. J Anat 2010;216:177-83.

22. Senior C, Thompson K, Badger J, Buttler MJR. Interviewing Strategies in the face of beauty. Ann New York Acad Sci 2007;1118:142-62.

23. Halpern ME, Güntürkün O, Hopkins WD, Rogers LJ. Lateralization of the vertebrate brain: taking the side of model systems. J Neurosc 2005;25:10351-7.