medigraphic.com
ISSN 2594-1518 (Digital)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Impreso)

2012, Número S2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Cir Gen 2012; 34 (S2)


Fecundación asistida

Marcó BJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 49
Paginas: 83-86
Archivo PDF: 88.02 Kb.


FRAGMENTO

Introducción

El deseo de ser padres es una aspiración hermosa y legítima. La mayoría de las parejas dan por hecho que tendrán descendencia, y pocas piensan, de antemano, que podría no suceder así. Pero cuando aparecen las dificultades para concebir se convierte en un problema difícil de afrontar. Empieza la inquietud e intensas emociones de angustia, coraje, dolor, resentimiento o depresión. También aparecen sentimientos de frustración, se sienten poco valorados, como si fueran una mercancía defectuosa, se encuentran excluidos en fiestas de familias o en la televisión. Todos estos sentimientos y emociones van a influir mucho en el proceso de decisión ante las posibilidades que existen para afrontar el problema.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Hilgers TW, Daly KD, Prebil AM, Hilgers SK. Cumulative pregnancy rates in patients with apparently normal fertility and fertility-focused intercourse. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 864-6.

  2. Hilgers TW. Medical and Surgical Practice NaProtechnology. Institute Press, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, 2004: 1243.

  3. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. The Lancet 1978; 2: 366.

  4. Marcó J, Tarasco M. En: Diez temas de reproducción asistida. Ediciones Internacionales Universitarias (EIUNSA), Madrid, 2001.

  5. Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, Katayama KP. Meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004; 21: 437-43.

  6. Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects- a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 328-38.

  7. Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005; 73: 162-9.

  8. Lie RT, Lyngstadaas A, Orstavik KH, Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Tanbo T. Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34: 696-701.

  9. Merlob P, Sapir O, Sulkes J, Fisch B. The prevalence of major congenital malformations during two periods of time, 1986-1994 and 1995-2002 in newborns conceived by assisted reproduction technology. Eur J Med Genet 2005; 48: 5-11.

  10. Olson CK, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Romitti PA, Budelier WT, Ryan G, Sparks AE, Van Voorhis BJ. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1308-15.

  11. Schieve LA, Rasmussen SA, Reefhuis J. Risk of birth defects among children conceived with assisted reproductive technology: providing an epidemiologic context to the data. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1320-4.

  12. Svensson J, Björnståhl A, Ivarsson SA. Increased risk of Silver-Russell syndrome after in vitro fertilization. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94: 1163-15.

  13. Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ 2006; 333: 679.

  14. Fedder J, Gabrielsen A, Humaidan P, Erb K, Ernst E, Loft A. Malformation rate and sex ratio in 412 children conceived with epididymal or testicular sperm. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1080-5.

  15. Hansen M, Sullivan E, Jequier AM, Burton P, Junk S, Yovich J, Bower C. Practitioner reporting of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 516-20.

  16. Sanchez-Albisua I, Borell-Kost S, Mau-Holzmann UA, Licht P, Krägeloh-Mann I. Increased frequency of severe major anomalies in children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 129-34.

  17. Spandorfer SD, Bendikson K, Dragisic K, Schattman G, Davis OK, Rosenwaks Z. Outcome of in vitro fertilization in women 45 years and older who use autologous oocytes. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 74-6.

  18. Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M. Outcome of assisted reproduction. The Lancet 2007; 370: 351-59.

  19. Van Voorthis BJ. Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization. BJN Engl J Med 2007; 356: 379-86.

  20. Bertelsmann H, de Carvalho Gomes H, Mund M, Bauer S, Matthias K. The risk of malformation following assisted reproduction. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105: 11-7.

  21. Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch MM, Vermeiden JP, van Leeuwen FE, Delemarre-van de Waal HA. Growth and development of children born after in vitro fertilization. Fert Steril 2008; 90: 1662-73.

  22. Neelanjana M, Sabaratnam A. Malignant conditions in children born after assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008; 63: 669-76.

  23. El-Chaar D, Yang Q, Gao J, Bottomley J, Leader A, Wen SW, Walker M. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproduction. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1557-61.

  24. Mitsiakos G, Giougi E, Tsakalidis C, Kourti M, Chatziionnidis H, Karagianni P, Kolibianakis EM, Nikolaidis N. Data a case of Adams–Oliver Syndrome following in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 1529-30.

  25. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 360-6.

  26. Wennerholm, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2158-72.

  27. Ferraretti AP, Pennings G, Gianaroli L, Natali F, Magli MC. Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive Technologies. Reprod. Biomed Online 2010; 20: 261-6.

  28. Halliday JL, Ukoumunne OC, Baker HW, Breheny S, Jaques AM, Garrett C, Healy D, Amor D. Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 59-65.

  29. Källén B, Finnström O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Otterblad PO. Congenital malformations in infants born after in vitro fertilization in Sweden. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Ter Atol 2010; 88: 137-43.

  30. Zuppa AA, Cardiello V, Lai M, Cataldi L, D’Andrea V, Romagnoli C. ABO hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: an iatrogenic complication of heterologous assisted reproductive technology-induced pregnancy. Transfusion 2010; 50: 2102-4.

  31. Fortunato A, Tosti E. The impact of in vitro fertilization on health of the children: an update. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 154: 125-9.

  32. Giapros V, Drougia A, Asproudis I, Theocharis P, Andronikou S. Low gestational age and chronic lung disease are synergistic risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity. Hearly Hum Dev 2011; 87: 653-7.

  33. Impicciatore GG, Tiboni GM. Ovulation inducing agents and cancer risk: review of literature. Curr Drug Staf 2011; 6: 250-8.

  34. Konefał H, Peregud-Pogorzelski J, Hnatyszyn G, Posio V, Stepaniuk M, Kram A, Czeszyńska MB. Two histologically different tumours in a neonate born from an assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Gynecol Pol 2011; 82: 705-8.

  35. Metwally M, Ledger WL. Long-term complications of assisted reproductive Technologies. Human Fertil 2011; 14: 77-87.

  36. Morken N.H. Preterm delivery in IVF versus ICSI singleton pregnancies: a national population-based cohort. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 154: 62-6.

  37. Brezina PR, Zhao Y. The ethical and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies. Obstetric and Gynecolo Int 2012; Article ID 686253, 7 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/686253.

  38. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA, Chan A. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1803-13.

  39. Dupont C, Sifer C. A review of outcome data concerning children born following assisted reproductive technologies. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012: 405382.

  40. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, American Society for Reproductive Medicina (2007). Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1253-66.

  41. De Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson D. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology. World collaborative report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2310-20.

  42. Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernqvist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in vitro fertilization: a population-based study. Lancet 2002; 359: 461-5.

  43. Marcó FJ, Tarasco M. Fecundación in vitro y manipulación de embriones. En: Porter J, Villalobos J, Martínez O, Tarasco M (eds). Introducción a la Bioética (3ª ed.). Méndez Editores, S.A, México, Capítulo 14, 2009: 225-66.

  44. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Järvelin MR. Post-neonatal hospitalization and health care costs among IVF children: a 7-year follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2136-41.

  45. Klemetti R, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2192-8.

  46. Källén B, Finnström O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Otterblad PO. Congenital malformations in infants born after in vitro fertilization in Sweden. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88: 37-43.

  47. Lidegaard O, Pinborg A, Andersen AN. Imprinting disorders after assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18: 293-6.

  48. Odom LN, Segars J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2010; 17: 517-22.

  49. Arnaud P, Feil R. Epigenetic deregulation of genomic imprinting in human disorders and following assisted reproduction. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2005; 75: 81-97.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com