2012, Número 2
<< Anterior Siguiente >>
Rev Mex Cardiol 2012; 23 (2)
Análisis comparativo de angioplastia versus cirugía en la coronariopatía multivaso; perspectiva de un hospital comunitario
Solís-Olivares CA, Solís-Soto JM
Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 22
Paginas: 64-71
Archivo PDF: 67.26 Kb.
RESUMEN
Introducción: Hasta 60% de los casos tratados con intervención coronaria percutánea (ICP) o cirugía (CRVC) tienen enfermedad coronaria de múltiples vasos (ECMV).
Objetivo: Comparar la evolución clínica de estos pacientes después de su comparativo, de una cohorte tratada por ECMV con CRVC o ICP más
stents farmacoactivos o bioactivos entre enero de 2004 a julio de 2011. Se utilizó expediente clínico, consignando eventos cardiovasculares adversos.
Resultados: Ingresaron 134 pacientes, predominando varones con enfermedad trivascular y angina estable con un seguimiento de 35.7 ± 20.4 meses. El grupo quirúrgico tuvo más dislipidemia (41.9
vs 36.7%), diabetes (59.5
vs 38.3%), hipertensión arterial (67.6
vs 60%), infarto del miocardio antiguo (37.8
vs 23.3%) y lesión tipo C en la arteria descendente anterior (63.9
vs 30.4%), p ‹ 0.05 para todas. Los tratados con ICP tuvieron más necesidad de revascularización repetida (30.50
vs 2.73%) p ‹ 0.01, recurrencia de angina (44
vs 20%), ergometrías positivas (39
vs 18%), hospitalizaciones (25
vs 9%) y deterioro funcional según la New York Heart Association III o IV (22
vs 11%), p ‹ 0.05 para todos.
Conclusión: En pacientes de un hospital comunitario con ECMV, la ICP presenta una recurrencia superior de isquemia y revascularización repetida comparada con la CRVC.
REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)
Sabik JF. CABG or PCI? A cardiothoracic surgeon’s perspective. The devil (or truth) is in the details. Clev Clin J Med 2006; 73: 329-338.
Klein LW. Are drug-eluting stents the preferred treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 22-26.
Tsigkas GG, Karantalis V, Hahalis G, Alexopoulos D. Stent restenosis, patophysiology and treatment options: a 2010 update. Hell J Cardiol 2011; 52: 149-157.
Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, Jatene A et al. Arterial revascularization therapies study group. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1117-1124.
Unger F. Drug eluting stents– a nightmare? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007; 6: 813-814.
Carrizo G, Pocovi A, Tajer C. Seguridad de los stents liberadores de droga. Rev Argent Cardiol 2007; 75: 207-214.
Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, Pauker SG, Salem DN, Wong JB. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one–to eight–year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1293-1304.
SoS Investigators. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the stent or surgery trial): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 965-970.
Rodríguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, Baldi J et al. Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II); 30-day and one-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 51-58.
Serruys PW, Ong AT, Morice MC, De Bruyne B et al. Arterial revascularization therapies study part II: Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions. Eurointervention 2005; 1: 147-156.
Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A et al. SYNTAX investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-972.
Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Stahle E et al. Comparison if coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2125-134.
Hannan EL, Wu C, Waldford G, Culliford AT et al. Drug-eluting stents vs coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Eng J Med 2008; 358: 331-341.
Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, Qureshi AC et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-Year results of the CARDia (coronary artery revascularization in diabetes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 432-440.
Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1503-1516.
Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, Hardison RM et al. BARI 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2503-2515.
Fuster V. De la enfermedad multivaso compleja a la salud cardiovascular. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010; 63(Supl 2): 3-11.
Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, Santos RM, Gandhi SK, Baki TT et al. “Off-label” stent therapy, 2-Year comparison of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 607-614.
Fernández AJ. Stents liberadores de fármacos: reestenosis intrastent. Rev Fed Arg Cardiol 2010; 39: 319-323.
Pijls NH, van Shaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’tVeer M et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non significant stenosis. 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2105-2111.
Beller GA, Ragosta M. Decision making in multivessel coronary disease: the need of physiological lesion assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2010; 3: 315-317.
Massoudy P, Thielmann M, Lehmann N, Marr A, Kleikamp G, Maleszka A et al. Impact of prior percutaneous intervention on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 840-845.