medigraphic.com
ISSN 0016-3813 (Impreso)

2009, Número 5

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Gac Med Mex 2009; 145 (5)


Manejo endovascular de la aterosclerosis carotídea Parte I. Consideraciones básicas y elementos diagnósticos

Zenteno-Castellanos MA, Santos-Franco JA, Vega-Montesinos S, Lee-Aguirre Á

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 56
Paginas: 407-414
Archivo PDF: 145.69 Kb.


RESUMEN

La aterosclerosis carotídea es responsable de alrededor de 25 % de los eventos vasculares cerebrales isquémicos. Para decidir el manejo adecuado es importante conocer los aspectos básicos de la fisiopatología de la placa y cuál es su repercusión clínica. La tecnología actual ofrece una gama amplia de estudios de gabinete que permiten visualizar y analizar las características de la placa. El correcto conocimiento de la fisiopatología, así como la comprensión de los estudios de imagen disponibles en la actualidad son fundamentales para la planificación terapéutica.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Hallström B, Jönsson AC, Nerbrand C, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Stroke incidence and survival in the beginning of the 21st century in Southern Sweden: comparisons with the late 20th century and projections into the future. Stroke 2008;39:10-15.

  2. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke. Statistics 2003 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2003.

  3. Dyken M. Stroke risk factors in prevention of stroke. En: Norris JW HV, editor. Prevention of stroke. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991: pp. 83-102.

  4. Pasternak RC, Criqui MH, Benjamin EJ, Fowkes FG, Isselbacher EM, McCullough PA, et al. American Heart Association. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group I: Epidemiology. Circulation 2004;109:2605-2612.

  5. Louridas G, Junaid A. Management of carotid artery stenosis. Update for family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2005;51:984-989.

  6. Ernst CB SJ. Current therapy in vascular surgery. 4th edition. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2001: p. 102.

  7. Simons PC, Algra A, Eikelboom BC, Grobbee DE, van der Graaf Y. Carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the SMART Study. SMART Study Group. J Vasc Surg 1999;30:519-525.

  8. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, Peto C, Peto R, Potter J, et al. Prevention of disabiling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1491-1502.

  9. Kastrup A, Ernemann U, Nägele T, Gröschel K. Risk factors for early recurrent cerebral ischemia before treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 2006;37:3032-3034.

  10. Kolodgie FD, Nakazawa G, Sangiorgi G, Ladich E, Burke AP. Pathology of atherosclerosis and stenting. Neuroimag Clin N Am 2007;17:285-301.

  11. Glagov S, Zarins C, Giddens DP, Ku DN. Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insight and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988;112:1018-1031.

  12. Takaba M, Endo S, Kurimoto M, Kuwayama N, Nishijima M, Takaku A. Vasa vasorum of the intracranial arteries. Acta Neurochir 1998;140:411-416.

  13. Virmani R, Ladich ER, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD. Histopathology of carotid atherosclerotic disease. Neurosurgery 2006;59:S3-219-S3-227.

  14. Velican G. A dissecting view on the role of fatty streak in the pathogenesis of human atherosclerosis: Culprit or bystander? Med Interne 1981;19:321-337.

  15. Arauz A, Hoyos L, Zenteno M, Mandoza R, Alexanderson E. Carotid plaque immflamation detected by 18F-flurodeoxyglucosae-positron emission tomography. Pilot study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007;109:409-412.

  16. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, et al. A definition of avanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Atheriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;92:1355-1374.

  17. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronay disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1276-1282.

  18. Vengrenyuk Y, Carlier S, Xanthos S, Cardoso L, Ganatos P, Virmani R, et al. A hypothesis for vulnerable plaque rupture due to stress-induced debonding around cellular microcalcifications in thin fibrous cap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:14678-14683.

  19. Derdeyn CP. Mechanisms of ischemic stroke secondary to large artery atherosclerotic disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007;17:303-311.

  20. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1262-1275.

  21. Derdeyn CP, Videen TO, Yundt KD, Fritsch SM, Carpenter DA, Grubb RL, et al. Variability of cerebral blood volume and oxygen extraction: stages of cerebral haemodynamic impairment revisited. Brain 2002;125:595-607.

  22. Zanette EM, Fieschi C, Bozzao L, Roberti C, Toni D, Argentino C, Lenzi GL. Comparison of cerebral angiography and transcranial doppler sonography in acute stroke. Stroke 1989;20:899-903.

  23. del Zoppo GJ, Poeck K, Pessin MS, Wolpert SM, Furlan AJ, Ferbert A, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute trombotic and embolic stroke. Ann Neurol 1992;32:78-86.

  24. Grubb RL Jr, Derdeyn CP, Fritsch SM, Carpenter DA, Yundt KD, Videen TO, et al. Importance of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic carotid occlusion. JAMA 1998;280:1055-1060.

  25. Moody DM, Bell MA, Challa VR. Features of the cerebral vascular pattern that predict vulnerability to perfusion or oxygenation deficiency: an anatomic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:431-439.

  26. Derdeyn CP, Grubb RL Jr, Powers WJ. Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: methods of measurement and association with stroke risk. Neurology 1999;53:251-259.

  27. Lal BK. Cognitive function after carotid artery revascularization. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2007;41:5-13.

  28. Bowler JV. The concept of vascular cognitive impairment. J Naurol Sci 2002;203-204:11-15.

  29. Roman GC. Vascular dementia: distinguishing characteristics, treatment, and prevention, J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:S296-304.

  30. Rao R. The role of carotid stenosis in vascular cognitive impairment. Eur Neurol 2001;46:63-69.

  31. Johnston SC, O’Meara ES, Manolio TA, Lefkowitz D, O’Leary DH, Goldstein S, et al. Cognitive impairment and decline are associated with carotid artery disease in patients without clinically evident cerebrovascular disease. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:237-247.

  32. Mathiesen EB, Waterloo K, Joakimsen O, Bakke SJ, Jacobsen EA, Bonaa KH. Reduced neuropsychological test performance in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: The Tromso Study. Neurology 2004;62:695-701.

  33. Meairs S SW. Ultrasound imaging and doppler sonography. En: Stroke: physiopathology, diagnosis and management. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p. 298.

  34. Gaitini D, Soudack M. Diagnosing carotid stenosis by doppler sonography: state of the art. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:1127-1136.

  35. Schulz UG, Rothwell PM. Association between arterial bifurcation anatomy and angiographic plaque ulceration among 4627 carotid stenoses. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15:244-251.

  36. Thiele BL, Jones AM, Hobson RW, Bandyk DF, Baker WH, Sumner DS, et al. Standards in noninvasive cerebrovascular testing. Report from the Committee on Standards for Noninvasive Vascular Testing of the Joint Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:495-503.

  37. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with highgrade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453.

  38. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trialist. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379-1387.

  39. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray scale and doppler ultrasound diagnosis. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 2003;229:340-346.

  40. Collins P, McKay I, Rajagoplan S, Bachoo P, Robb O, Brittenden J. Is carotid duplex scanning sufficient as the sole investigation prior to carotid endarterectomy? Br J Radiol 2005;78:1034-1037.

  41. Henderson RD, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Rothwell PM, Barnett HJ. Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 2000;31:128-132.

  42. Feasby TE, Findlay JM. CT angiography for the assessment of carotid stenosis. Neurology 2004;63:412-413.

  43. Muhs BE, Gagne P, Wagener J, Baker J, Ortega MR, Adelman MA, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: What is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis? Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:823-828.

  44. Farb A, Burke AP, Tang AL, Liang TY, Mannan P, Smialek J, et al. Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core. A frequent case of coronay death. Circulation 1996;93:1354-1363.

  45. Wasserman BA, Sharrett AR, Lai S, Gomes AS, Cushman M, Folsom AR. Risk factor associations with the presence of a lipid core in carotid plaque of asymptomatic individuals using high-resolution MRI. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Stroke 2008;39(2):329-335.

  46. Mano Y, Shimizu H, Inoue T, Tominaga T. [Magnetic resonance angiographic occlusion of the cervical carotid artery at 3 tesla: its pitfalls] [Article in Japanese] No Shinkei Geka 2008;36:51-58.

  47. Johnston D. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001;57:2012–2014.

  48. Filis KA, Arko FR, Johnson BL, Pipinos II, Harris EJ, Olcott C 4th, et al. Duplex ultrasound criteria for defining the severity of carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:413-421.

  49. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, Johnston SC, Dillon WP, Smith WS. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 2004;63:457-460.

  50. Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, Majoie CB. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 2004;35:2306-2312.

  51. Conceição C PT, Evangelista P. Angio-TC da doença carotídea ateromatosa. Acta Med Port 2003;16:149-153.

  52. Oliver TB, Lammie GA, Wright AR, Wardlaw J, Patel SG, Peek R, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid bifurcation: CT angiographic appearance with histopathologic. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:897-901.

  53. U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ, Higgins NJ, Cross JJ, Tom BD, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology 2004;62:1282-1290.

  54. Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Wright AR, Gibson RJ, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21-28.

  55. Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ, Buijs-Van Der Woude T, Mali WP, Kappelle LJ, Eikelboom BC, et al. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology 2004;233:101-112.

  56. Moore WS. For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation is unnecessary. Stroke 2003;34:1816-1817.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com