medigraphic.com

2002, Número 6

<< Anterior

Cir Cir 2002; 70 (6)


Carta al editor

Reyes FA

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 17
Paginas: 477-478
Archivo PDF: 23.50 Kb.


FRAGMENTO

Me permito enviarle los siguientes comentarios en relación al artículo: “Cáncer de cérvix. Algunas consideraciones acerca de la cirugía radical” del académico Dr. Alfonso Torres Lobatón(1). Es verdad que el Servicio de Oncología del Hospital General de México es una gran fuente de experiencia en el manejo del cáncer cérvico-uterino en nuestro país, y que el Dr. Torres Lobatón es, sin lugar a dudas, un experto en el tema. Sin embargo, existen datos dentro del artículo señalado que merecen particular atención y aclaración.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Torres-Lobatón A. Cáncer de cérvix. Algunas consideraciones acerca de la cirugía radical. Cir Ciruj 2002;70:183-7.

  2. Eifel PA, Berek JS, Thigpen JT. Cancer of the cervix, vagina, and vulva. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors: Cancer. Principles and practice of oncology. 6ª edition Lippincot Williams and Wilkins 2001:1526-73.

  3. Sakuragi N, Satoh Ch, Takeda N, et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IB, IIA and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 1999;85:1547-54.

  4. Winter R, Haas J, Reich O, et al. Parametrial spread of cervical cancer in patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2002;84:252-7.

  5. Creasman W, Soper JT, Clarke-Pearson D. Radical hysterectomy as therapy for early carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:964-9.

  6. Abu-Rustum NR, Hoskins WJ. Radical abdominal hysterectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2001;81:815-28.

  7. Piver SM, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1974;44:265-72.

  8. Photopulos GJ, Vander ZR. Class II radical hysterectomy shows less morbidity and good treatment efficacy compared to class III. Gynecol Oncol 1991;40:21-4.

  9. Magrina JF, Goodrich MA, Weaver AM, Podratz KC. Modified radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:277-82.

  10. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al. Class II versus Class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 2001;80:3-12.

  11. Michalas S, Rodolakis A, Voulgaris Z, Vlachos G, Giannakoulis N, Diakomanolis E. Management of early-stage cervical carcinoma by modified (type II) radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2002;85:415-22.

  12. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Kitamura S. Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:7-14.

  13. Averette HE, Nguyen HN, Donato DM, et al. Radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: a 25-year prospective experience with the Miami technique. Cancer 1993;71:1422-37.

  14. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, et al. Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: an anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1996;62:19-24.

  15. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G. Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2001;81:841-58.

  16. Merrik HW. Patient selection and preoperative evaluation for radical pelvic surgery. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1994;3:205-16.

  17. Estape R, Angioli R. Surgical management of advanced and recurrent cervical cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 1999;16:236-41.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com