medigraphic.com
ISSN 0188-2198 (Impreso)

2001, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Cardiol 2001; 12 (3)


Cirugía de revascularización coronaria mediante procedimientos de invasión mínima. Revisión de opciones, indicaciones y comparación con otros procedimientos

Siordia ZJA, Gamez BL

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 43
Paginas: 121-127
Archivo PDF: 99.00 Kb.


FRAGMENTO

Durante 1998, considerada la recopilación estadística anual más reciente que se ha publicado, la mayoría de los procedimientos quirúrgicos para revascularizar el miocardio se hicieron con el uso de la derivación cardiopulmonar (DCP) y el paro cardiopléjico del corazón.
Un poco más de 25% de los pacientes sometidos a revascularización con uso de DCP presentan > 1 complicación (vgr.: fibrilación auricular, flutter, sangrado, infarto del miocardio, dehiscencia o infección esternal, accidente cerebral, insuficiencia renal). Aunque una proporción de la morbilidad asociada a la revascularización con cirugía está relacionada con factores co-mórbidos de los pacientes, algunas de las complicaciones son debidas a las técnicas utilizadas durante la cirugía.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Ferguson TB Jr, Dziuban SW, Edwards FH, Eikens MC, Shroyer LW, Pairolero PC, Anderson RP, Grover FL. The STS National Database: Current Changes and Challenges for the New Millenium. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 680-691.

  2. 2 Kolessov VI. Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967; 54: 535-544.

  3. Bonchek LI, Ullyot DJ. Minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. Circulation 1998; 98: 495-497.

  4. Reardon MJ, Espada R, Letsou GV, Safi HJ, McCollum CH, Baldwin JC. Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery-a word of cautin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 419-420.

  5. Borst C, Grundeman PF. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: an experimental perspective. Circulation 1999; 99: 1400-1403.

  6. Mack M, Damiano R, Matheny R, Reichenspurner H, Carpenter A. Inertia of success. A response to minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. Circulation 1999; 99: 1404-1406.

  7. Riess FC, Scofer J, Kremer P, Riess AG, Bergmenn H, Moshar S, Mathey D, Bleese N. Beating heart operations including hybrid revascularization: initial experiences. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1076-1081.

  8. Trehan N, Mishra Y, Mehta Y, Jangid DR. Transmyocardial laser as an adjunct to minimally invasive CABG for complete myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1113-1118.

  9. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, Newman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R, Aggarawal A, Marschall K, Graham SH, Ley C. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1857-1863.

  10. Selnes OA, Goldsborough MA, Borowics LM Jr, Enger C, Quaskey SA, McKhann GM. Determinants of cognitive change after coronary artery bypass surgery: a multifactorial problem. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1669-1676.

  11. McKhann GM, Goldsborough MA, Borowics LM Jr, Selnes OA, Mellits DE, Enger C, Quaskey SA, Baumgartner WA, Cameron DA, Stuart RS, Gardner TJ. Cognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass: a one year prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 510-515.

  12. Anderson RE, Hanson LO, Vaage J. Release of S100B during coronary artery bypass grafting is reduced by off-pump surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1721-1725.

  13. Taylor KM. Central nervous system effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(5 Suppl): S20-S24.

  14. Harris DN, Bailey SM, Smith PL, Taylor KM, Oatridge A, Bydder GM. Brain swelling in first hour after coronary artery bypass surgery. Lancet 1993; 342: 586-587.

  15. Sylivris S, Levi C. Matalania G, Rosalion A, Buxton BF, Mitchell A, Fitt G, Harberts DB, Saling MM, Tonkin AM. Pattern and sigificance of cerebral microemboli during coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1674-1678.

  16. Grichnik KP, Ijsselmuiden AJ, D’Amico TA, Harpole DH, White WD, Blumenthal JA, Newman MF. Cognitive decline after major noncardiac operations: a preliminary prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1786-1791.

  17. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 61: 1714-1720.

  18. Lundblad R, Moen O, Fosse E. Endothelin-1 and neutrophil activation during heparin–coated cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1361-1367.

  19. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ et al. Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1198-1204.

  20. Borst C, Santamore WP, Smedira NG et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graffing: on the beating heart and via limited access. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63(6 suppl): S1-S5.

  21. Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, Capouya ER. Technical aspects of total revascularization in off-pump coronary bypass via sternotomy approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1653-1658.

  22. Heijimen RH, Borst C, Moues CM et al. Temporary luminal arteriotomy seal: post mortem arteriosclerotic human coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1183-1185.

  23. Cable DG, Dearani JA. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive video-assisted saphenectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1183-1185.

  24. Burfeind WR Jr, Duhaylongosd FG, Annex BH et al. High flow gas insufflation to facilitate MIDCAB: effects on coronary endothelium. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1246-1249.

  25. Alderman EL, Levy JH, Rich JB et al. Analyses of coronary graft patency after aprotinin use: results from the International Multicenter Aprotinin Graft Patency Experience (IMAGE) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116: 716-730.

  26. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. The last operation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 9: 305-311.

  27. Subramanian V, McCabe J, Geller CM et al. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Two years clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1648-1653.

  28. Gill IS, FitzGibbon GM, Higginson LA et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass. A series with early qualitative angiographic follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1349-1353.

  29. Alessandri F, Gaudino M, Glieca F et al. Lesions of the target vessel during minimally invasive myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1349-1353.

  30. Buffolo E, De Andrade CS, Branco JN et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 63-66.

  31. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G et al. Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary, surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115: 763-771.

  32. Cohn WE, Sirois CA, Johnson RG. Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective, matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117: 298-301.

  33. Del Rizzo DF, Boyd WD, Novick RJ et al. Safety and cost-effectiveness of MIDCAB in high risk CABG patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1002-1007.

  34. Galloway AC, Shemin RJ, Glower DD et al. First report of the port access international registry. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 51-56.

  35. Reichenspurner H, Gulielmos V, Wunderlich J et al. Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 413-419.

  36. Mohr GF, Falk V, Diegeler A et al. Computer enhanced coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117: 1212-1214.

  37. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M et al. Assited surgycal system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 1-16.

  38. Grupo de Investigación de: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with multivessel disease. Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217-225.

  39. Miriani MA, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary angioplasty fro isolated type C stenosis of the left anterior descending artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 434-439.

  40. Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Moliterno DJ y et al. Complementary clinical benefits of coronary artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIa receptors. The evaluation of platelet IIb/IIIa inhibition in stenting. N Eng J Med 1999; 341: 319-327.

  41. Wait MA. What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in revascularization of patients? ACC Educational Highlights 1998; 14(1): 6-8.

  42. Zenati M, Cohen HA, Holubkov R et al. Preoperative risk models for minimally invasive coronary bypass: a preliminary study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116: 584-589.

  43. Off RA, Gutfinger DE, Miller MP et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting “on pump”. Role of the three-day discharge. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 478-481.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com