Leopoldo Pérez IL, Benítez DR, Serra V, Cordeiro P, Zamorano JL

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 210-221
Archivo PDF: 141.99 Kb.

RESUMEN

Hasta el momento, la valoración de la severidad de la estenosis miral reumática ha estado basado en métodos Doppler, muy influenciables por las condiciones hemodinámicas del paciente y en métodos de planimetría valvular obtenida a partir de imágenes bidimensionales. La ecocardiografía 3D en tiempo real ha hecho su aparición en la rutina clínica diaria, proporcionando imágenes de alta calidad en tres dimensiones y requiriendo un muy corto período de tiempo para su adquisición. En el presente trabajo tratamos de realizar una puesta al día de la utilidad de esta técnica en la valoración de la severidad de la estenosis mitral reumática. Estos hallazgos están basados en la experiencia de nuestra Unidad de Imagen Cardiovascular del Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Chen QW, Nosir YFM, Vletter WB, et al: Accurate assessment of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 133-140.

2. Nosir YFM, Chen Q, Vletter WB, et al: Accurate mitral valve area assessment in patients with mitral stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 7846.

3. Binder T, Globits S, Zangeneh M, et al: Three-dimensional echocardiography using a transesophageal imaging probe: potentials and technical considerations. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 619-28.

4. Zamorano J, Cordeiro P, Sugeng L, Perez de Isla L, Weinert L, Macaya C, Rodríguez E, Lang RM: Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(11): 2091-6.

5. Zamorano J, Pérez de Isla L, Sugeng L, Cordeiro P, Rodrigo JL, Almería C, Weinert L, Feldman T, Macaya C, Lang RM, Hernandez Antolín R: Non invasive assessment of mitral valve area during percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: Role of real time 3D echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2004; 25(23): 2086-91.

6. Smith MD, Wisenbaugh T, Grayburn PA, et al: Value and limitations of Doppler pressure half-time in quantifying mitral stenosis: a comparison with micromanometer catheter recordings. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 480-8.

7. Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, et al: Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988; 77: 78-85.

8. Karp K, Teien D, Bjerle P, et al: Reassessment of valve area determinations in mitral stenosis by the pressure half-time method: impact of left ventricular stiffness and peak diastolic pressure difference. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 1: 594-9.

9. Fredman CS, Pearson AC, Labovitz AJ, et al: Comparison of hemodynamic pressure half-time method and Gorlin formula with Doppler and echocardiographic determinations of mitral valve area in patients with combined stenosis and regurgitation. Am Heart J 1990; 119: 121-9.

10. Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE, Gillam L, et al: Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis: clinical evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 396-404.

11. Mannaerts H, Li Y, Kamp O, et al: Quantitative assessment of mechanical prosthetic valve area by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 723-31.

12. Chen QW, Nosir YFM, Vletter WB, et al: Accurate assessment of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 133-140.

13. Kupferwasser I, Mohr-Kahaly S, Menzel T, et al: Quantification of mitral valve stenosis by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1996; 12: 241-7.

14. Casale PN, Whitlow P, Currie PJ, et al: Transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty for mitral stenosis. Cleve Clin J Med 1989; 56: 597-600.

15. Ben Farhat M, Gamra H, Betbout F, et al: Percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy during pregnancy. Heart 1997; 77: 564-7.

16. Iung B, Cormier B, Elias J, et al: Usefulness of percutaneous balloon commissurotomy for mitral stenosis during pregnancy. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 398-400.

17. Turi ZG, Reyes VP, Raju S, et al: Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. A prospective, randomized trial. Circulation 1991; 83: 1179-85.

18. Ben Farhat M, Ayari M, Maatouk F, et al: Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed and open mitral commissurotomy: Seven-year followup results of a randomized trial. Circulation 1998; 97: 245-50.

19. Reid CL, Rahimtoola SH: The role of echocardiography/Doppler in catheter balloon treatment of adults with aortic and mitral stenosis. Circulation 1991; 84: 240-9.

20. Vahanian A, Michel PL, Cormier B, et al: Results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in 200 patients. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 847-52.

21. Nakatani S, Nagata S, Beppu S, et al: Acute reduction of mitral valve area after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: Assessment with Doppler continuity equation method. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 770-5.

22. Otto CM, Davis KB, Holmes DR, et al: Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1607-16.

23. Thomas JD, Wilkins GT, Choong CY, et al: Inaccuracy of mitral pressure-halftime immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy: Dependence on mitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance. Circulation 1988; 78: 980-93.