medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Impreso)

2007, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2007; 8 (2)


Sistemas de evaluación de destreza en cirugía endoscópica

Justo JJM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 52
Paginas: 90-96
Archivo PDF: 88.38 Kb.


RESUMEN

Introducción: El entrenamiento en cirugía requiere de una evaluación objetiva válida y confiable. Para cirugía endoscópica se han desarrollado sistemas que ayudan a evaluar la destreza que se adquiere con la práctica, así como la proeficiencia y la competencia de cirujanos y sujetos en entrenamiento.
Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sistemática de la literatura, recopilando los artículos que contengan sistemas de evaluación de destreza en cirugía endoscópica, su análisis y sus métodos de validación y consistencia.
Método: Búsqueda en Medline de 1991 a diciembre de 2005 y análisis de los artículos aleatorizados y controlados.
Resultados: 1,117 resultados se obtuvieron, de ellos se recopilaron 89 disponibles y 58 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión; 52 se usaron para la revisión. Incluyen a 18 diferentes sistemas de evaluación que se describen.
Conclusiones: Los sistemas de evaluación de destreza en cirugía endoscópica son una herramienta necesaria durante el entrenamiento y en la práctica clínica.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH, Fried GM. The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 1998; 12(9): 1117-1120.

  2. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A. Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 2004; 91(12): 1549-1558.

  3. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(10): 1525-1529.

  4. Satava RM, Gallagher AG, Pellegrini CA. Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196(6): 933-937.

  5. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004; 91(2): 146-150.

  6. Feldman LS, Sherman V, Fried GM. Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use? Surgery 2004; 135(1): 28-42.

  7. Satava RM, Cuschieri A, Hamdorf J. Metrics for objective assessment. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(2): 220-226.

  8. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G. Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 2001; 233(2): 159-166.

  9. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B et al. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 2004; 135(1): 21-27.

  10. Villegas L, Schneider BE, Callery MP, Jones DB. Laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(12): 1879-1888.

  11. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Montori V, Cina C, Tandan V, Guyatt GH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg 2004; 47(1): 60-67.

  12. Sacks HS, Berrier J, Reitman D, Ancona-Berk VA, Chalmers TC. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1987; 316(8): 450-455.

  13. Youngblood PL, Srivastava S, Curet M, Heinrichs WL, Dev P, Wren SM. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200(4): 546-551.

  14. Adrales GL, Chu UB, Witzke DB, Donnelly MB, Hoskins D, Mastrangelo MJ Jr et al. Evaluating minimally invasive surgery training using low-cost mechanical simulations. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(4): 580-585.

  15. Bann S, Davis IM, Moorthy K, Munz Y, Hernandez J, Khan M et al. The reliability of multiple objective measures of surgery and the role of human performance. Am J Surg 2005; 189(6): 747-752.

  16. Gordon JA, Oriol NE, Cooper JB. Bringing good teaching cases «to life»: a simulator-based medical education service. Acad Med 2004; 79(1): 23-27.

  17. Dath D, Regehr G, Birch D, Schlachta C, Poulin E, Mamazza J et al. Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills. Surg Endosc 2004; 18(12): 1800-1804.

  18. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 2004; 18(3): 485-494.

  19. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H. The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(9): 1324-1328.

  20. Uchal M, Raftopoulos Y, Tjugum J, Bergamaschi R. Validation of a six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(1): 109-116.

  21. Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Dunne JB, Yau CL, Corsetti RL et al. Determining standards for laparoscopic proficiency using virtual reality. Am Surg 2005; 71(1): 29-35.

  22. Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Massarweh NN, Dunne JB, Yau CL et al. Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? J Surg Res 2004; 122(2): 150-156.

  23. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, Cakmak HK, Kuehnapfel UG, Germer CT et al. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 2005; 241(3): 442-449.

  24. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002; 236(4): 458-463.

  25. Schijven M, Klaassen R, Jakimowicz J, Terpstra OT. The intercollegiate Basic Surgical Skills Course. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(12): 1978-1984.

  26. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IA, Tseng LN. The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course—improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first EAES accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(9): 1220-1226.

  27. Van Sickle KR, Iii DA, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 2005.

  28. Sarker SK, Vincent C, Darzi AW. Assessing the teaching of technical skills. Am J Surg 2005; 189(4): 416-418.

  29. Sharpe BA, MacHaidze Z, Ogan K. Randomized comparison of standard laparoscopic trainer to novel, at-home, low-cost, camera-less laparoscopic trainer. Urology 2005; 66(1): 50-54.

  30. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191(3): 272-283.

  31. Korndorffer JR Jr, Scott DJ, Sierra R, Brunner WC, Dunne JB, Slakey DP et al. Developing and testing competency levels for laparoscopic skills training. Arch Surg 2005; 140(1): 80-84.

  32. Keyser EJ, Derossis AM, Antoniuk M, Sigman HH, Fried GM. A simplified simulator for the training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 2000; 14(2): 149-153.

  33. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005; 190(1): 107-113.

  34. Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM. Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(1): 130-137.

  35. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL. Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 1998; 175(6):482-487.

  36. Feldman LS, Hagarty SE, Ghitulescu G, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. Relationship between objective assessment of technical skills and subjective in-training evaluations in surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198(1): 105-110.

  37. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2004; 240(3): 518-525.

  38. Avgerinos DV, Goodell KH, Waxberg S, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD. Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user’s level of experience. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(9): 1211-1215.

  39. Swanstrom LL, Fried GM, Hoffman KI, Soper NJ. Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202(1): 62-69.

  40. Tang B, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Analysis of errors enacted by surgical trainees during skills training courses. Surgery 2005; 138(1): 14-20.

  41. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201(1): 23-29.

  42. Korndorffer JR Jr, Hayes DJ, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Markert RJ et al. Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(2): 161-167.

  43. Korndorffer JR Jr, Clayton JL, Tesfay ST, Brunner WC, Sierra R, Dunne JB et al. Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. J Surg Res 2005; 128(1): 114-119.

  44. Sereno-Trabaldo S, Fregoso-Ambriz JM, Gaxiola-Robles R, Zermeno-Hernandez J, Garcia-Iniguez JA, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. [Measurement of the development of psychomotor abilities in surgical endoscopy training with the use of a simulator and biological pieces.] Cir Cir 2005; 73(2): 113-119.

  45. Eubanks TR, Clements RH, Pohl D, Williams N, Schaad DC, Horgan S et al. An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189(6): 566-574.

  46. Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees BI, Darzi A. Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 2001; 15(10): 1076-1079.

  47. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A. Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: Construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 2004.

  48. Hance J, Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A. Assessment of psychomotor skills acquisition during laparoscopic cholecystectomy courses. Am J Surg 2005; 190(3): 507-511.

  49. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J, Schot C. The Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester (ADEPT) objectifying subjective psychomotor test performance. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(6): 943-948.

  50. Smith CD, Farrell TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE. Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 2001; 181(6): 547-550.

  51. Sherman V, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Kazmi R, Fried GM. Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(5): 678-682.

  52. Gallagher AG, Satava RM. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(12): 1746-1752.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com