medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Impreso)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2022, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2022; 24 (3)


Influencia del modo de grabado y del tipo de resina en la resistencia adhesiva al Biodentine utilizando un adhesivo universal tipo 'no-wait'

Sarialioğlu GA, Aycan UB

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 38
Paginas: 36-47
Archivo PDF: 231.23 Kb.


RESUMEN

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la resistencia de adhesión al cizallamiento (SBS) de cuatro resinas con un cemento a base de silicato utilizando una adhesivo universal "no-wait" de autograbado (SE) y grabado y lavado (ER). Se prepararon bloques acrílicos (n=80, de 2mm de profundidad y un agujero central de 5mm de diámetro). Los agujeros se rellenaron con BiodentineTM (BD) y se dividieron en 4 grupos principales (n=20) según el tipo de resina compuesta utilizada: Grupo FZ250: FiltekTM Z250 Universal Restorative (microhíbrido), Grupo SDR: SDR Plus U Bulk Fill Flowable (bulk-fill de baja viscosidad), Grupo FBP: FiltekTM Bulk Fill Posterior (bulk-fill de alta viscosidad), Grupo EF: EsFlow™ Universal Flowable Composite (nanohíbrido). Para la aplicación de la adhesión se utilizó un adhesivo universal "no-wait" (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick). A continuación, cada grupo se dividió en 2 subgrupos según el modo de grabado aplicado (ER y SE). Se midieron los SBS y se utilizó el estereomicroscopio para identificar los modos de fallo. Las muestras seleccionadas de las superficies de fractura se analizaron mediante SEM. Se utilizaron las pruebas post-hoc de Tukey y ANOVA de una vía para analizar los datos. Hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos de composites (p‹0,05). Cuando la SDR mostró los valores más altos de resistencia a la adhesión en el modo SE (17,13±2,98 MPa), la FBP mostró los valores más bajos de resistencia a la adhesión en el modo ER (8,89±2,46 MPa). La SBS media no fue diferente entre los modos SE y ER (p›0,05). La SBS de la BD a los composites de resina depende del tipo de composite, pero la aplicación de la unión universal "no-wait" en los diferentes modos de grabado es independiente de la SBS de la BD a los composites de resina.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Kodonas K., Fardi A., Gogos C., Economides N. Scientometric analysis of vital pulp therapy studies. Int Endod J. 2020.

  2. Cushley S., Duncan H.F., Lappin M.J., Chua P., Elamin A.D., Clarke M. Efficacy of direct pulp capping for management of cariously exposed pulps in permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2020.

  3. Schmidt A., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. Shear Bond Strength of Lining Materials to Calcium-silicate Cements at Different Time Intervals. J Adhes Dent. 2017; 19 (2): 129-135.

  4. Kaup M., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. An in vitro study of different material properties of Biodentine compared to ProRoot MTA. Head Face Med. 2015; 11:16.

  5. Malkondu Ö., Karapinar Kazandağ M., Kazazoğlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 160951.

  6. Koubi G., Colon P., Franquin J.C., Hartmann A., Richard G., Faure M.O. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17 (1): 243-249.

  7. Cantekin K., Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22 (4): 302-306.

  8. Heymann H.O., Ritter A.V., Sturdevant C.M. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/ Mosby; 2013.

  9. Çolak H., Tokay U., Uzgur R., Uzgur Z., Ercan E., Hamidi M.M. The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between Biodentine and composite. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016; 14 (2): 217-222.

  10. Odabaş M.E., Bani M., Tirali R.E. Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to biodentine. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013: 626103.

  11. Meraji N., Camilleri J. Bonding over Dentin Replacement Materials. J Endod. 2017; 43 (8): 1343-1349.

  12. Cengiz E., Ulusoy N. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016; 18 (3): 231-237.

  13. Altunsoy M., Tanriver M., Ok E., Kucukyilmaz E. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral TrioxideAggregate, Calcium-enriched MixtureCement, and Biodentine. J Endod. 2015; 41(10): 1691-1695.

  14. Cantekin K., Avci S. Evaluation of shearbond strength of two resin-based compositesand glass ionomer cement to pure tricalciumsilicate-based cement (Biodentine(R)).J Appl Oral Sci: revista FOB 2014; 22 (4):302-306.

  15. International Standards Organization. ISO/TS 11405. Dentistry-Testing of Adhesionto Tooth Structure. Geneva, Switzerland:ISO; 2015.

  16. Alzraikat H., Taha N.A., Qasrawi D., BurrowM.F. Shear bond strength of a novel lightcured calcium silicate based-cement to resincomposite using different adhesive systems.Dent Mater J. 2016; 35: 881-887. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-075

  17. Tsujimoto M., Tsujimoto Y., OokuboA., Shiraishi T., Watanabe I., Yamada S.,Hayashi Y. Timing for composite resinplacement on mineral trioxide aggregate.J Endod. 2013;39:1167-1170. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.009

  18. Ahmed M.H., Yoshihara K., Mercelis B., VanLanduyt K., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B.Quick bonding using a universal adhesive.Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24 (8): 2837-2851.doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8

  19. Kuraray Noritake (2018) Clearfil UniversalBond quick brochure. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/clearfiluniversal-bond quick-new-cap-brochure-sm.pdf Accessed 01 Nov 2018

  20. Hashem D.F., Foxton R., Manoharan A.,et al. The physical characteristics of resincomposite calcium silicate interface as part ofa layered/laminate adhesive restoration. DentMater. 2014; 30: 343-349.

  21. Camilleri J. Investigation of Biodentine asdentine replacement material. J Dent. 2013;41: 600-610.

  22. Anastasiadis K., Koulaouzidou E.A., PalaghiasG., Eliades G. Bonding of composite to basematerials: effects of adhesive treatments onbase surface properties and bond strength. Jadhes Dent. 2018; 20: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40302

  23. Mahdan M.H., Nakajima M., Foxton R.M.,Tagami J. Combined effect of smear layercharacteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressureon dentine bond strength of HEMA-freeand HEMA-containing adhesives. J Dent.2013; 41: 861-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.002

  24. Gregoire G., Dabsie F., Dieng-Sarr F.,Akon B., Sharrock P. Solvent compositionof one-step self-etch adhesives and dentinewettability. J Dent. 2011; 39: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.008

  25. Sezinando A. Looking for the ideal adhesive–a review. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent CircMaxilofac. 2014; 55: 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.07.004

  26. Namazikhah M.S., Nekoofar M.H.,Sheykhrezae M.S., et al. The effect of pHon surface hardness and microstructure ofmineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J.2008; 41: 108-116.

  27. Shokouhinejad N., Nekoofar M.H., IravaniA. Effect of acidic environment on the pushoutbond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate.J Endod. 2010; 36: 871-874.

  28. Torabinejad M., Chivian N. Clinical applicationsof mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod.1999; 25: 197-205.

  29. Watts J.D., Holt D.M., Beeson T.J., et al.Effects of pH and mixing agents on thetemporal setting of tooth-colored and graymineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2007;33: 970-973.

  30. Roy C.O., Jeansonne B.G., Gerrets T.F. Effectof an acid environment on leakage of root-endfilling materials. J Endod. 2001; 27: 7-8.

  31. Ilie N., Keßler A., Durner J. Influence ofvarious irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk‑fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013;41:695‑702.

  32. Van Ende A., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K.L., Poitevin A., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., et al. Bulk‑filling of high C‑factor posterior cavities: Effect on adhesion to cavity‑bottom dentin. Dent Mater. 2013; 29: 269‑277.

  33. Moorthy A., Hogg C.H., Dowling A.H., Grufferty B.F., Benetti A.R., Fleming G.J., et al. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk‑fill flowable resin‑based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012; 40: 500‑505.

  34. Saito T., Takamizawa T., Ishii R., Tsujimoto A., et al. Influence of Application Time on Dentin Bond Performance in Different Etching Modes of Universal Adhesives. Oper Dent. 2020; 45 (2): 183-195.

  35. Palma P.J., Marques J.A., Falacho R.I., Vinagre A., Santos J.M., Ramos J.C. Does delayed restoration improve shear bond strength of different restorative protocols to calcium silicate-based cements?. Materials (Basel). 2018;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112216

  36. Oskoee S.S., Kimyai S., Bahari M., Motahari P., Eghbal M.J., Asgary S. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011; 12: 457-462. https://doi.org/10.5005/jpjournals-10024-1076

  37. Bachoo I.K., Seymour D., Brunton P. A biocompatible andbioactive replacement for dentine: is this a reality? The properties and uses of a novel calcium-based cement. Br Dent J. 2013; 214 (2): 1-7.

  38. Placido E., Meira J.B.C., Lima R.G., Muench A., de Souza R.M., Ballester R.Y. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: afinite element stress analysis. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (9): 1086-1092.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com