medigraphic.com
ISSN 0035-0052 (Impreso)

2000, Número 6

<< Anterior

Rev Mex Pediatr 2000; 67 (6)


Generalidades sobre la evaluación de competencias clínicas

Prado VR

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 45
Paginas: 278-283
Archivo PDF: 77.44 Kb.


RESUMEN

El concepto de competencia clínica varía ampliamente: y se le pueden dar atributos que van desde la exigencia para una certificación hasta postulados de orden filosófico. Esta situación hace difícil su evaluación, por lo que es necesario categorizarla y adaptarla a una situación dada y utilizar los instrumentos adecuados. Por ser de uso más frecuente se presentan métodos de evaluación que valoran: la competencia clínica al lado del enfermo, la competencia clínica con el uso de exámenes objetivos estructurados, la competencia clínica con instrumentos que se utilizan para la certificación que se conoce como evaluación de la competencia profesional.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Becker DF, Swanson DB, Case SM, Nungester RJ. Results of the initial administration of the NBME comprehensive parl Y and part II examinations, Academic Medicine, Supplement 1992; 67(10): S16-S18.

  2. Berner ES, Brooks CM, Erdmann JB. IV: Use of the USMLE to select residents. Academic Medicine 1993; 68 (10): 753-755.

  3. BowLes TL. Use of NBME and USMLE scores. Academic Medicine 1993; 68(10): 778.

  4. Case SM, Ripkey DR, Swanson DB. The relationship between clinical sciencie performance on step 2 of the USMLE licensing examination. Academic Medicine Supplement 1996; 71(1): S31-S33.

  5. Cohen R, Rothman AI, Sibilan S, Ross J. Analysis of the psychometric properties of eight administrations of an objective structured clinical examination used to asess international medical graduates. Academic Medicine Supplement 1996; 71 (1): S22-S24.

  6. Cunnington JPW, Hanna E, Turnbull J, Kaigas TB, Norman GR. Defensible assesment of the competency of the practicing physician. Academic Medicine 1997; 72 (1): 9-12

  7. Delors JL. The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the international commision of education for twenty first century 1996.

  8. Dhillon J, Moreland N. Participants’ experience of a competence-based professional development programme: a case study. Journal of Vocational Education and Traning 1996; 48 (4): 367-384.

  9. Dupras DM, Li JTC. Use of an objective structured clinical examination to determine clinical competence. Academic Medicine 1995; 70 (11): 1029-1034.

  10. Erdmann JB. Guidance for the use of the USMLE in medical education settings. Academic Medicine 1993; 68 (10): 733.

  11. Finocchio LJ, Bailiff PJ, Grant RW, O’Neil EH. Professional competencies in the changing health care system: Physicians views on the importance and adequacy of formal training in medical school. Academic Medicine 1995; 70 (11): 1023-1028.

  12. Forsythe GB. Construct validity of medical clinical competence measures: A multitrait-multimethod matrix study using confirmatory factor analysis. American Educational Research Journal Summer 1986; 23 (2): 315-336.

  13. Giardino AP, Giardino ER, Maclaren CF, Burg FD. Managing change: a case study of implementing change in a clinical evaluation system. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1994; 6(3): 149-153.

  14. Gonnella JS, Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Veloski JJ. What have we learned, and where do we go from here? Academic Medicine, Supplement 1993; 68(2): S79-S87.

  15. Gonella JS, Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Veloski JJ. The impact of early career specialization on licensing requirements and related educational implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education 1997; 1: 125-139.

  16. Greenlick MR. Educationg physicians for the twenty-first century. Academic Medicine 1995; 70 (3): 179-185.

  17. Hammar M, Forsberg PMW, Loftas Pi. And innovative examination ending the medical curriculum. Medical Education 1995; 29: 452-457.

  18. Harder RM, Stevernson M, Downie WW, Wilsin GM. Assesment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. British Medical Journal 1975; 1: 447-451.

  19. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assesment of clinical competence using and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Medical Education 1979; 13: 41-54

  20. Hoffman K II. The USMLE, the NBME subjet examinations, and assesment of individual academic achievement. Academic Medicine 1993; 68 (10): 740-747.

  21. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Educación basada en competencias, marco conceptual documento de trabajo 1995.

  22. Islas FJ, Thierry GDR. La competencia laboral del instructor de capacitación y desarrollo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Documento de trabajo 1996.

  23. Martini CJM. Evaluating the competence of health professionals. Medical Education 1988; 260 (8); 1057-1058.

  24. Mcguire C. Perspectives in assessment. Academic Medicine Suplement 1993; 68 (2): S3-S8.

  25. Neufeld V. Assesing clinical competence. Springer Publishing Company. New York 1985.

  26. Newble D, Dawson B. Guidelines for assessing clinical competence. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1994; 6 (3): 213-220.

  27. Norman GR. Objective measurement of clinical performance medical education 1985; 19: 43-47.

  28. Norman GR. Why evaluate? Pedagogue. Perspectives on Health Sciences Education 1994; 5 (1): 1-6.

  29. O’Donell MJ, Obenshain SS, Erdmann JB. I: Background essential to the proper use of results of step 1 and step 2 of the USMLE. Academic Medicine 1993; 68 (10): 734-739.

  30. OECD. Education and training. Learning and working in a society in fux. Head of Publication Services, OECD 1996.

  31. Petrusa ER, Blackwell TA, Rogers LP, Saydjari C, Parcel S, Guckian JC. An objective measure of clinical performance. The American Journal of Medicine 1987; 83: 34-42.

  32. Reznick R, Smee S, Rothman H et al. An objective estructured clinical examination for the licenciate: Report of the pilot of the medical council of Canada. Academic Medicine 1992; 67 (8): 487-494.

  33. Reznick RK, Smee S, Baumber JS et al. Guidelines for estimating the real cost of an objective structured clinical examination. Academic Medicine 1993; 68 (7): 513-517.

  34. Reznick RK, Blackmore D, Dauphinee WD et al. Large-scale high-stakes testing with an OSCE: Report from the medical council of Canada. Academic Medicine Supplement 1996; 71(1): Sl9-S21.

  35. Ripkey DR, Case SM. Examinees, perceptions of factors influencing their performance on USMLE step 2. Academic Medicine, Supplement 1996; 71(1): S34-S36.

  36. Scott CS, Barrows HS, Brock DM, Hunt DD. Clinical behaviors and skills that faculty from 12 institutions judged were essential for medical students to acquire. Academic Medicine 1991; 66 (2): 106-111.

  37. Scott CS, Gilliland BC, Hurt DD. Evaluating clinical skill in an undergraduate medical education curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1993; 5(1): 49-53.

  38. Shannon S, Norman G. Evaluation methods. A resource handbook. McMaster University. Ontario, Canada 1995.

  39. Swanson DB, Norman GR, Linn RL. Performance-based assessment: Lessons for health profession. Pedagogue: Perspectives on Health Science Education 1996; 6(3): 1-6.

  40. Swanson DB, Case SM, Koenig J, Killian CD. Preliminary study of the accuracies of the old and new medical college admission test for predicting performance on USMLE step 1. Academic Medicine Supplement 1996 b; 71 (1): S25-S27.

  41. Swanson DB, Ripkey DR, Case SM. Relationship between achievement in basic science coursework and performance on 1994 USMLE step 1 test administrations. Academic Medicine supplement 1996 c; 71 (1): S28-S30

  42. Viniegra VI, Jiménez JL, Pérez-Padilla JR. El desafío de la evaluación de la competencia clínica. La Revista de Investigación Clínica 1991; 43 (1): 87-95.

  43. Viniegra VL, Jiménez JL. Nuevas aproximaciones a la medición de la competencia clínica. La Revista de Investigación Clínica 1992; 44 (2): 269-275.

  44. Williams RG. III: Use of NBME and USMLE examination to evaluate medical education programs. Academic Medicine 1993; 68 (10): 748-752.

  45. Woolliscroft JO, Stross JK, Silva Jr. J. Clinical competence certification: A critical appraisal. Journal of Medical Education 1984; 59: 799-805.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com