medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Impreso)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2021, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Odont Mex 2021; 25 (2)


Desinfección de los materiales de impresión dental y sus efectos en los cambios dimensionales: una revisión de la literatura

Dapello-Zevallos GM, San MKNM, Febre-Cuibin KS, Gutiérrez-Obando DA, Tinedo-López PL

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 27
Paginas: 154-159
Archivo PDF: 154.48 Kb.


RESUMEN

Un desinfectante debe cumplir dos requisitos fundamentales: ser un agente antimicrobiano eficaz y preservar la estabilidad dimensional y los detalles de la superficie de la impresión. Esto permite obtener modelos de yeso mucho más precisos que permiten la fabricación de prótesis. Los procedimientos más recomendados son la inmersión y la pulverización, utilizando soluciones desinfectantes como el hipoclorito de sodio, el glutaraldehído, los yodóforos y los fenoles a diferentes concentraciones. Los materiales de impresión disponibles no fueron formulados originalmente para desinfectar, por lo que existe la posibilidad de que los procedimientos de desinfección alteren las características físicas de las impresiones y, en consecuencia, las características del modelo de placa. Por ello, el objetivo de esta revisión actualizada es conocer el efecto de los desinfectantes sobre la estabilidad dimensional de diferentes materiales de impresión tras ser sometidos a distintos métodos de desinfección.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Marinheiro MC, Rebelo SC, Soares M, Figueiralce MH, Maia AR. Comportamentos na desinfecão das impressões dentárias por médicos dentistas e técnicos de prótese de Viseu. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2014; 55 (4): 232-237.

  2. Guiraldo RD, Borsato TT, Berger SB, Lopes MB, Gonini Jr A, Sinhoreti MA. Surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models: influence of disinfectant solutions and alginate impression materials. Braz Dent J. 2012; 23 (4): 417-421.

  3. Samra RK, Bhide SV. Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of impression materials from developing countries and developed countries after disinfection with different immersion disinfectant systems and ultraviolet chamber. Saudi Dent J. 2018; 30 (2): 125-141.

  4. Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramanium M. Comprehensive review and comparison of the disinfection techniques currently available in the literature. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28 (2): e849-e856.

  5. Soganci G, Cinar D, Caglar A, Yagiz A. 3D evaluation of the effect of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and stability of two elastomeric impression materials. Dent Mater J. 2018; 37 (4): 675-684.

  6. Estafanous EW, Palenik CJ, Platt JA. Disinfection of bacterially contaminated hydrophilic PVS impression materials. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21 (1): 16-21.

  7. Amin WM, Al-Ali MH, Al Tarawneh SK, Taha ST, Saleh MW, Ereifij N. The effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of impression materials and gypsum casts. J Clin Med Res. 2009; 1 (2): 81-89.

  8. Azevedo MJ, Correia I, Portela A, Sampaio-Maia B. A simple and effective method for addition silicone impression disinfection. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11 (3): 155-161.

  9. Pal PK, Kamble SS, Chaurasia RR, Chaurasia VR, Tiwari S, Bansal D. Evaluation of different disinfactants on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of type IV gypsum casts retrieved from elastomeric impression materials. J Int Oral Health. 2014; 6 (3): 77-81.

  10. Ismail HA, Mahross HZ, Shikho S. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy for different complete edentulous impressions immersed in different disinfectant solutions. Eur J Dent. 2017; 11 (2): 242-249.

  11. Guiraldo RD, Berger SB, Sigueira RM, Grandi VH, Lopes MB, Gonini-Júnior A et al. Surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of molds: influence of disinfectant solutions and elastomeric impression materials. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2017; 30 (1): 13-18.

  12. Thota KK, Jasthi S, Ravuri R, Tella S. A comparative evaluation of the dimensional stability of three different elastomeric impression materials after autoclaving - an invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8 (10): 48-50.

  13. Rentzia A, Coleman DC, O'Donnell MJ, Dowling AH, O'Sullivan M. Disinfection procedures: Their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Dent. 2011; 39 (2): 133-140.

  14. Goel K, Gupta R, Solanki J, Nayak M. A comparative study between microwave irradiation and sodium hypochlorite chemical disinfection: a prosthodontic view. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8 (4): 42-46.

  15. Hidalgo I, Balarezo A. Estudio in vitro de la alteración dimensional de impresiones con silicona por adición sometidas a desinfección. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2004; 14 (2-1): 45-50.

  16. Bustos J, Herrera R, González U, Martínez A, Catalán A. Effect of inmersion desinfection with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite and 2% glutaraldehyde on alginate and silicone: microbiology and SEM study. Int J Odontostomat. 2010; 4 (2): 169-177.

  17. Ahila S, Subramaniam E. Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and surface quality of gypsum casts retrieved from disinfected addition silicone impressions at various time intervals: an in vitro study. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2012; 4 (4): 34-43.

  18. Melilli D, Rallo A, Cassaro A, Pizzo G. The effect of immersion disinfection procedures on dimensional stability of two elastomeric impression materials. J Oral Sci. 2008; 50 (4): 441-446.

  19. AlZain S. Effect of 0.5% glutaraldehyde disinfection on surface wettability of elastomeric impression materials. Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31 (1): 122-128.

  20. Almortadi N, Chadwick R. Disinfection of dental impressions – compliance to accepted standards. Br Dent J. 2010; 209 (12): 607-611.

  21. Kotsiomiti E, Tzialla, A, Hatjivasiliou K. Accuracy and stability of impression materials subjected to chemical disinfection – a literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35 (4): 291-299.

  22. Nassar U, Ava K. Surface detail reproduction and effect of disinfectant and long-term storage on the dimensional stability of a novel vinyl polyether silicone impression material. J Prosthodont. 2015; 24 (6): 494-498.

  23. Nimonkar SV, Belkhode VM, Godbole SR, Nimonkar PV, Dahane T, Sathe S. Comparative evaluation of the effect of chemical disinfectants and ultraviolet disinfection on dimensional stability of the polyvinyl siloxane impressions. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019; 9 (2): 152-158.

  24. Demajo JK, Cassar V, Farrugia C, Millan-Sango D, Sammut C, Valdramidis V et al. Effectiveness of disinfectants on antimicrobial and physical properties of dental impression materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2016; 29 (1): 63-67.

  25. Asopa SJ, Padiyar UN, Verma S, Suri P, Somayaji NS, Radhakrishnan IC. Effect of heat sterilization and chemical method of sterilization on the polyvinyl siloxane impression material. A comparative study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9 (3): 1348-534.

  26. Ulgey M, Gorler O, Yesilyurt G. Importance of disinfection time and procedure with different alginate impression products to reduce dimensional instability. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020; 23 (3): 284-290.

  27. AlZain S. Effect of chemical, microwave irradiation, steam autoclave, ultraviolet light radiation, ozone and electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfection on properties of impression materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32 (4): 161-170.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com